Leibniz-Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries (IGB), Müggelseedamm 301/310, 12587 Berlin, Germany; Institute of Biology, Freie Universität Berlin, Schwendenerstraße 1, 14195 Berlin, Germany.
Leibniz-Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries (IGB), Müggelseedamm 301/310, 12587 Berlin, Germany.
Environ Pollut. 2018 Sep;240:630-638. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.04.146. Epub 2018 May 14.
The increasing use of artificial light at night (ALAN) has led to exposure of freshwater ecosystems to light pollution worldwide. Simultaneously, the spectral composition of nocturnal illumination is changing, following the current shift in outdoor lighting technologies from traditional light sources to light emitting diodes (LED). LEDs emit broad-spectrum white light, with a significant amount of photosynthetically active radiation, and typically a high content of blue light that regulates circadian rhythms in many organisms. While effects of the shift to LED have been investigated in nocturnal animals, its impact on primary producers is unknown. We performed three field experiments in a lowland agricultural drainage ditch to assess the impacts of a transition from high-pressure sodium (HPS) to white LED illumination (color temperature 4000 K) on primary producers in periphyton. In all experiments, we compared biomass and pigment composition of periphyton grown under a natural light regime to that of periphyton exposed to nocturnal HPS or, consecutively, LED light of intensities commonly found in urban waters (approximately 20 lux). Periphyton was collected in time series (1-13 weeks). We found no effect of HPS light on periphyton biomass; however, following a shift to LED the biomass decreased up to 62%. Neither light source had a substantial effect on pigment composition. The contrasting effects of the two light sources on biomass may be explained by differences in their spectral composition, and in particular the blue content. Our results suggest that spectral composition of the light source plays a role in determining the impacts of ALAN on periphyton and that the ongoing transition to LED may increase the ecological impacts of artificial lighting on aquatic primary producers. Reduced biomass in the base of the food web can impact ecosystem functions such as productivity and food supply for higher trophic levels in nocturnally-lit ecosystems.
夜间人工照明(ALAN)的使用日益增多,导致全球淡水生态系统受到光污染的影响。与此同时,随着户外照明技术从传统光源向发光二极管(LED)的转变,夜间照明的光谱组成也在发生变化。LED 发出广谱白光,含有大量的光合有效辐射,通常含有大量调节许多生物体昼夜节律的蓝光。虽然已经研究了向 LED 转变对夜间动物的影响,但它对初级生产者的影响尚不清楚。我们在一个低地农业排水渠中进行了三项野外实验,以评估从高压钠灯(HPS)过渡到白色 LED 照明(色温 4000 K)对附着生物区系初级生产者的影响。在所有实验中,我们将在自然光条件下生长的附着生物区系的生物量和色素组成与在夜间 HPS 或连续暴露于常见于城市水域的 LED 光(约 20 lux)下生长的附着生物区系的生物量和色素组成进行了比较。附着生物区系是按时间序列(1-13 周)采集的。我们没有发现 HPS 光对附着生物区系生物量的影响;然而,在转向 LED 后,生物量下降了多达 62%。两种光源都没有对色素组成产生重大影响。两种光源对生物量的相反影响可能归因于它们的光谱组成的差异,特别是蓝色含量。我们的研究结果表明,光源的光谱组成在确定 ALAN 对附着生物区系的影响方面起着作用,而目前向 LED 的过渡可能会增加人工照明对水生初级生产者的生态影响。食物链底部生物量的减少会影响生态系统功能,如生产力和为夜间有光照的生态系统中的更高营养级提供食物。