Allison Jill
Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada.
Reprod Biomed Soc Online. 2016 Dec 13;3:134-141. doi: 10.1016/j.rbms.2016.09.004. eCollection 2016 Dec.
Assisted reproductive technology has become a normalized part of reproductive medicine in many countries around the world. Access, however, is uneven and inconsistent, facilitated and restricted by such factors as affordability, social and moral acceptance or refusal and local cultures of medical practice. In Ireland, assisted reproductive technology has been available since 1987 but remains unregulated by legislation. This creates an uncertain and untenable legal circumstance given the contested issues related to constitutional protection of the right to life of the unborn and the indeterminate legal status of embryos . This paper examines the impact of an enduring political impasse. It explores how clinical assisted reproductive technology services in Ireland operate both inside and outside dominant institutional frameworks, meeting a pronatalist and pro-family social and political agenda, while sometimes contradicting the pro-life politics that has continued to shape women's reproductive lives. The medical approaches to infertility thus intersect with the ongoing debates around abortion, the failure of the government to regulate, and notions of embodied motherhood and responsibility within changing meanings of family and kinship. At the same time women and their partners seek assisted reproductive technology treatment in other countries throughout the European Union where laws differ and availability of services varies. A decade has passed since the Commission on Assisted Human Reproduction in Ireland released its recommendations; the enduring legislative vacuum leaves women, families and practitioners in potential legal limbo.
辅助生殖技术在世界上许多国家已成为生殖医学中常态化的一部分。然而,其可及性并不均衡且不稳定,受到诸如可承受性、社会和道德上的接受或拒绝以及当地医疗实践文化等因素的促进或限制。在爱尔兰,辅助生殖技术自1987年起就已存在,但仍未受到立法监管。鉴于与未出生胎儿生命权的宪法保护相关的争议问题以及胚胎不确定的法律地位,这造成了一种不确定且难以维持的法律状况。本文探讨了长期政治僵局的影响。它探究了爱尔兰的临床辅助生殖技术服务如何在主导性制度框架内外运作,既满足了鼓励生育和支持家庭的社会及政治议程,同时有时又与持续塑造女性生殖生活的反堕胎政治相矛盾。因此,治疗不孕症的医学方法与围绕堕胎的持续辩论、政府监管的缺失以及在不断变化的家庭和亲属关系意义中体现的母亲身份和责任观念相互交织。与此同时,女性及其伴侣在整个欧盟的其他国家寻求辅助生殖技术治疗,这些国家的法律不同,服务可及性也各异。自爱尔兰人类辅助生殖委员会发布其建议以来,十年已经过去;长期的立法真空使女性、家庭和从业者可能陷入法律困境。