• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心流体验作为一种自然类别:家族相似性观点。

Mind-Wandering as a Natural Kind: A Family-Resemblances View.

机构信息

Department of Psychology and Center for Brain Science, Harvard University, Harvard, MA, USA.

Department of Psychology, University of North Carolina Greensboro, Greensboro, NC, USA.

出版信息

Trends Cogn Sci. 2018 Jun;22(6):479-490. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2018.03.010.

DOI:10.1016/j.tics.2018.03.010
PMID:29776466
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5962028/
Abstract

As empirical research on mind-wandering accelerates, we draw attention to an emerging trend in how mind-wandering is conceptualized. Previously articulated definitions of mind-wandering differ from each other in important ways, yet they also maintain overlapping characteristics. This conceptual structure suggests that mind-wandering is best considered from a family-resemblances perspective, which entails treating it as a graded, heterogeneous construct and clearly measuring and describing the specific aspect(s) of mind-wandering that researchers are investigating. We believe that adopting this family-resemblances approach will increase conceptual and methodological connections among related phenomena in the mind-wandering family and encourage a more nuanced and precise understanding of the many varieties of mind-wandering.

摘要

随着对思维漫游的实证研究的加速,我们注意到思维漫游的概念化出现了一种新趋势。以前表述的思维漫游的定义在重要方面彼此不同,但它们也保持着重叠的特征。这种概念结构表明,最好从家族相似性的角度来考虑思维漫游,这需要将其视为一个渐变的、异构的结构,并清楚地测量和描述研究人员正在研究的思维漫游的具体方面。我们相信,采用这种家族相似性的方法将增加思维漫游家族中相关现象之间的概念和方法联系,并鼓励对思维漫游的许多变体有更细致和精确的理解。

相似文献

1
Mind-Wandering as a Natural Kind: A Family-Resemblances View.心流体验作为一种自然类别:家族相似性观点。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2018 Jun;22(6):479-490. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2018.03.010.
2
The Family-Resemblances Framework for Mind-Wandering Remains Well Clad.关于走神的家族相似性框架依然完备。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2018 Nov;22(11):959-961. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2018.07.007. Epub 2018 Sep 13.
3
Mind-wandering, cognition, and performance: a theory-driven meta-analysis of attention regulation.思维漫游、认知和表现:注意力调节的理论驱动元分析。
Psychol Bull. 2014 Nov;140(6):1411-1431. doi: 10.1037/a0037428. Epub 2014 Aug 4.
4
What's in a Task? Complications in the Study of the Task-Unrelated-Thought Variety of Mind Wandering.任务是什么?任务无关思维走神研究中的复杂性。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2020 May;15(3):572-588. doi: 10.1177/1745691619897966. Epub 2020 Feb 12.
5
Dissociating the freely-moving thought dimension of mind-wandering from the intentionality and task-unrelated thought dimensions.将游离思维的自由移动维度与意向性和任务无关的思维维度区分开来。
Psychol Res. 2021 Oct;85(7):2599-2609. doi: 10.1007/s00426-020-01419-9. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
6
Mind-Wandering With and Without Intention.有意与无意的走神。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2016 Aug;20(8):605-617. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2016.05.010. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
7
What Does "Mind-Wandering" Mean to the Folk? An Empirical Investigation.“走神”对于老百姓意味着什么?一项实证研究。
Cogn Sci. 2020 Oct;44(10):e12908. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12908.
8
On the Necessity of Distinguishing Between Unintentional and Intentional Mind Wandering.有必要区分非故意和故意的思维漫游。
Psychol Sci. 2016 May;27(5):685-91. doi: 10.1177/0956797616634068. Epub 2016 Mar 18.
9
Mind wandering in creative problem-solving: Relationships with divergent thinking and mental health.创意解决问题时的思维漫游:与发散思维和心理健康的关系。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 23;15(4):e0231946. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231946. eCollection 2020.
10
Intrusive thoughts: linking spontaneous mind wandering and OCD symptomatology.侵入性思维:连接自发的思维游荡与强迫症症状学
Psychol Res. 2017 Mar;81(2):392-398. doi: 10.1007/s00426-016-0756-3. Epub 2016 Feb 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Do individuals with disorders of consciousness dream and mind wander? Implications for improving diagnosis and understanding patient wellbeing.意识障碍患者会做梦和走神吗?对改善诊断及理解患者幸福感的启示
Neurosci Conscious. 2025 Sep 5;2025(1):niaf022. doi: 10.1093/nc/niaf022. eCollection 2025.
2
Demotivated, but still attentive: Text disfluency does not affect mind-wandering and reading comprehension, but reduces motivation.动力不足,但仍保持专注:文本不流畅不会影响走神和阅读理解,但会降低动力。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2025 Aug 7. doi: 10.3758/s13423-025-02735-0.
3
Attention in our digital ecosystem: The five interactive components that drive media multitasking.数字生态系统中的注意力:驱动媒体多任务处理的五个交互组件。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2025 Jun 27. doi: 10.3758/s13423-025-02722-5.
4
Reduced mind-wandering and fewer depressive symptoms associated with damage to the medial prefrontal cortex and default mode network.内侧前额叶皮质和默认模式网络受损与思维游荡减少及抑郁症状减轻相关。
Neuropsychologia. 2025 Jul 29;214:109168. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2025.109168. Epub 2025 May 9.
5
Using objective and subjective measures of mind wandering to predict progression to development of cognitive impairment and test associations with Alzheimer disease biomarkers.使用思维游荡的客观和主观测量方法来预测认知障碍发展的进程,并测试与阿尔茨海默病生物标志物的关联。
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2025 Apr;47(3):169-184. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2025.2498025. Epub 2025 Apr 27.
6
Oscillations of the Wandering Mind: Neural Evidence for Distinct Exploration/Exploitation Strategies in Younger and Older Adults.走神的振荡:年轻人和老年人不同探索/利用策略的神经证据
Hum Brain Mapp. 2025 Apr 15;46(6):e70174. doi: 10.1002/hbm.70174.
7
Enhanced individual difference of functional brain network induced by volitional eyes closing.闭眼意愿诱发的功能性脑网络个体差异增强。
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 15;15(1):13037. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-97621-z.
8
In-lecture quizzes improve online learning for university and community college students.课堂测验可改善大学生和社区学院学生的在线学习效果。
Commun Psychol. 2025 Apr 3;3(1):54. doi: 10.1038/s44271-025-00234-5.
9
Curiosity and Mind Wandering During Music Listening Are Negatively Correlated.听音乐时的好奇心与思绪飘荡呈负相关。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Mar 20;15(3):393. doi: 10.3390/bs15030393.
10
Where Is My Mind? The Daydreaming Characteristics Questionnaire, a New Tool to Differentiate Absorptive Daydreaming From Mind-Wandering.我的思绪飘到哪里去了?《白日梦特征问卷》,一种区分沉浸式白日梦与走神的新工具。
J Atten Disord. 2025 May;29(7):515-528. doi: 10.1177/10870547251319081. Epub 2025 Feb 24.

本文引用的文献

1
Is an off-task mind a freely-moving mind? Examining the relationship between different dimensions of thought.走神的大脑就是自由运转的大脑吗?探究不同思维维度之间的关系。
Conscious Cogn. 2018 Feb;58:20-33. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2017.10.003. Epub 2017 Oct 26.
2
For Whom the Mind Wanders, and When, Varies Across Laboratory and Daily-Life Settings.思维漫游者,以及何时在实验室和日常生活环境中变化。
Psychol Sci. 2017 Sep;28(9):1271-1289. doi: 10.1177/0956797617706086. Epub 2017 Jul 18.
3
When attention wanders: Pupillometric signatures of fluctuations in external attention.当注意力分散时:瞳孔测量对外注意力波动的特征。
Cognition. 2017 Nov;168:16-26. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.06.006. Epub 2017 Jun 20.
4
Cognitive aging and the distinction between intentional and unintentional mind wandering.认知衰老以及有意与无意走神之间的区别。
Psychol Aging. 2017 Jun;32(4):315-324. doi: 10.1037/pag0000172. Epub 2017 May 4.
5
Mind-wandering and task stimuli: Stimulus-dependent thoughts influence performance on memory tasks and are more often past- versus future-oriented.走神与任务刺激:依赖于刺激的思维会影响记忆任务的表现,且这些思维更多地是面向过去而非未来。
Conscious Cogn. 2017 Jul;52:55-67. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2017.04.014. Epub 2017 May 2.
6
Mindfulness and mind wandering: The protective effects of brief meditation in anxious individuals.正念与走神:简短冥想对焦虑个体的保护作用。
Conscious Cogn. 2017 May;51:157-165. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2017.03.009. Epub 2017 Apr 2.
7
What did you have in mind? Examining the content of intentional and unintentional types of mind wandering.你在想什么?研究有意和无意两种类型的走神内容。
Conscious Cogn. 2017 May;51:149-156. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2017.03.007. Epub 2017 Mar 31.
8
Intentionality and meta-awareness of mind wandering: Are they one and the same, or distinct dimensions?意图性和心智游移的元意识:它们是同一的,还是不同的维度?
Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Dec;24(6):1808-1818. doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1249-0.
9
Dealing with prospective memory demands while performing an ongoing task: Shared processing, increased on-task focus, or both?在执行一项正在进行的任务时处理前瞻记忆需求:共享加工、增强任务专注度,还是两者兼而有之?
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2017 Jul;43(7):1047-1062. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000359. Epub 2016 Dec 12.
10
Individual variation in intentionality in the mind-wandering state is reflected in the integration of the default-mode, fronto-parietal, and limbic networks.心流状态下意向性的个体差异反映在默认模式网络、额顶叶网络和边缘系统网络的整合中。
Neuroimage. 2017 Feb 1;146:226-235. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.11.025. Epub 2016 Nov 15.