• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

爱尔兰共和国堕胎服务准入的伦理争论:公共话语中的最新发展。

Ethical arguments for access to abortion services in the Republic of Ireland: recent developments in the public discourse.

机构信息

School of Nursing and Midwifery, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.

UCD School of Philosophy, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

J Med Ethics. 2018 Aug;44(8):513-517. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2017-104728. Epub 2018 May 18.

DOI:10.1136/medethics-2017-104728
PMID:29776978
Abstract

The Republic of Ireland has some of the most restrictive abortion legislation in the world which grants to the 'unborn' an equal right to life to that of the pregnant woman. This article outlines recent developments in the public discourse on abortion in Ireland and explains the particular cultural and religious context that informs the ethical case for access to abortion services. Our perspective rests on respect for two very familiar moral principles - autonomy and justice - which are at the centre of social and democratic societies around the world. This article explains the context for the deployment of these concepts in order to support the claim that the current legislation and its operationalisation in clinical practice poses serious risks to the health, lives and well-being of pregnant women, tramples on their autonomy rights and requires of them a self-sacrifice that is unreasonable and unjust.

摘要

爱尔兰共和国拥有世界上最严格的堕胎立法之一,该立法赋予“未出生者”与孕妇同等的生存权利。本文概述了爱尔兰堕胎问题公共讨论的最新进展,并解释了为获取堕胎服务而提出的伦理案件所依据的特殊文化和宗教背景。我们的观点基于对两个非常熟悉的道德原则——自主和公正——的尊重,这些原则是世界各地社会和民主社会的核心。本文解释了这些概念的应用背景,以支持这样一种说法,即现行立法及其在临床实践中的实施给孕妇的健康、生命和福祉带来了严重风险,践踏了她们的自主权,并要求她们做出不合理和不公正的自我牺牲。

相似文献

1
Ethical arguments for access to abortion services in the Republic of Ireland: recent developments in the public discourse.爱尔兰共和国堕胎服务准入的伦理争论:公共话语中的最新发展。
J Med Ethics. 2018 Aug;44(8):513-517. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2017-104728. Epub 2018 May 18.
2
Conflicting abortion laws in India: Unintended barriers to safe abortion for adolescent girls.印度相互冲突的堕胎法:对少女安全堕胎造成的意外障碍。
Indian J Med Ethics. 2019 Oct-Dec;4 (NS)(4):310-317. doi: 10.20529/IJME.2019.059.
3
A critical review of conscientious objection and decriminalisation of abortion in Chile.智利对堕胎非刑罪化和出于良心拒服兵役的批判性回顾。
J Med Ethics. 2018 Apr;44(4):279-283. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2017-104281. Epub 2018 Jan 6.
4
Abortion and human rights.堕胎与人权。
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2010 Oct;24(5):633-46. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2010.02.009. Epub 2010 Mar 19.
5
Women's right to health and Ireland's abortion laws.妇女的健康权与爱尔兰的堕胎法律。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015 Jul;130(1):93-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.04.020. Epub 2015 Apr 17.
6
Access to abortion.堕胎途径。
CMAJ. 2007 Feb 13;176(4):492; author reply 494. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.1060175.
7
The need for balancing the reproductive rights of women and the unborn in the Mexican courtroom.在墨西哥法庭上平衡女性生育权利与未出生胎儿权益的必要性。
Med Law Rev. 2010 Autumn;18(3):427-33. doi: 10.1093/medlaw/fwq018.
8
Abortion law around the world: progress and pushback.全球堕胎法:进展与阻力。
Am J Public Health. 2013 Apr;103(4):585-9. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.301197. Epub 2013 Feb 14.
9
Abortion rights judgment: a ray of hope!堕胎权判决:一线希望!
Indian J Med Ethics. 2017 Jul-Sep;2(3):180-183. doi: 10.20529/IJME.2017.044.
10
The Irish Journey: Removing the shackles of abortion restrictions in Ireland.爱尔兰之旅:摆脱爱尔兰堕胎限制的束缚。
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2020 Jan;62:36-48. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2019.05.011. Epub 2019 May 27.