• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

爱尔兰之旅:摆脱爱尔兰堕胎限制的束缚。

The Irish Journey: Removing the shackles of abortion restrictions in Ireland.

机构信息

Irish Family Planning Association, Dublin, Ireland.

St George's, University of London, London, UK.

出版信息

Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2020 Jan;62:36-48. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2019.05.011. Epub 2019 May 27.

DOI:10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2019.05.011
PMID:31395317
Abstract

In May 2018, the Irish electorate voted to remove from the Constitution one of the most restrictive abortion bans in the world. This referendum followed 35 years of legal cases, human rights advocacy, feminist activism and governmental and parliamentary processes. The reframing of abortion as an issue of women's health rather than foetal rights was crucial to the success of law reform efforts. The new law, enacted in 2018, provides for access to abortion on a woman's request up to 12 weeks of pregnancy and in situations of risk to the life or of serious harm to the health of the pregnant woman and fatal foetal anomaly thereafter. Abortion is now broadly accessible in Ireland; however, continued advocacy is needed to ensure that the state meets international human rights standards and that access to abortion care and abortion rights is fully secured within the law.

摘要

2018 年 5 月,爱尔兰选民投票决定从宪法中删除世界上最严格的堕胎禁令之一。这次公投是在 35 年的法律案件、人权倡导、女权主义激进主义以及政府和议会程序之后进行的。将堕胎重新定义为妇女健康问题而不是胎儿权利问题,这对于法律改革努力的成功至关重要。新法律于 2018 年颁布,规定在怀孕 12 周内,以及在危及孕妇生命或严重损害其健康或胎儿致命畸形的情况下,应根据妇女的请求提供堕胎服务。现在在爱尔兰堕胎已经广泛获得,但仍需要继续倡导,以确保国家符合国际人权标准,并在法律框架内充分确保堕胎护理和堕胎权利的获得。

相似文献

1
The Irish Journey: Removing the shackles of abortion restrictions in Ireland.爱尔兰之旅:摆脱爱尔兰堕胎限制的束缚。
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2020 Jan;62:36-48. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2019.05.011. Epub 2019 May 27.
2
Women's right to health and Ireland's abortion laws.妇女的健康权与爱尔兰的堕胎法律。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015 Jul;130(1):93-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.04.020. Epub 2015 Apr 17.
3
Irish voters repealed the eighth: now it's time to ensure access to abortion care in law and in practice.爱尔兰选民废除了第八修正案:现在是时候在法律和实践中确保堕胎护理的可及性了。
Reprod Health Matters. 2018 Dec;26(52):1513271. doi: 10.1080/09688080.2018.1513271.
4
"Pro-life" absolutes, feminist challenges: the fundamentalist narrative of Irish abortion law 1986-1992.“生命权至上”的绝对观念、女权主义的挑战:1986 - 1992年爱尔兰堕胎法的原教旨主义叙事
Osgoode Hall Law J. 1998 Spring;36(1):1-62.
5
Abortion rights judgment: a ray of hope!堕胎权判决:一线希望!
Indian J Med Ethics. 2017 Jul-Sep;2(3):180-183. doi: 10.20529/IJME.2017.044.
6
The Role of International Human Rights Norms in the Liberalization of Abortion Laws Globally.国际人权规范在全球堕胎法律自由化中的作用。
Health Hum Rights. 2017 Jun;19(1):69-80.
7
Abortion law around the world: progress and pushback.全球堕胎法:进展与阻力。
Am J Public Health. 2013 Apr;103(4):585-9. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.301197. Epub 2013 Feb 14.
8
Procedural abortion rights: Ireland and the European Court of Human Rights.程序性堕胎权利:爱尔兰与欧洲人权法院
Reprod Health Matters. 2014 Nov;22(44):22-30. doi: 10.1016/S0968-8080(14)44798-0.
9
Northern Ireland deadlock impedes abortion rights progress.北爱尔兰的僵局阻碍了堕胎权利的进展。
Lancet. 2019 May 4;393(10183):1794. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31003-7.
10
Women challenge Irish law on abortion in Europe on human rights grounds.女性以人权为由,在欧洲对爱尔兰的堕胎法律提出挑战。
BMJ. 2009 Dec 10;339:b5457. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b5457.

引用本文的文献

1
How Woman-Centred Care Is Experienced and Understood in Maternity Services by Women and Professionals: A Rapid Review.女性和专业人员如何在产科服务中体验和理解以女性为中心的护理:一项快速综述。
Scand J Caring Sci. 2025 Sep;39(3):e70086. doi: 10.1111/scs.70086.
2
Self-managed abortions in Ghana: A health policy framework analysis.加纳的自我管理堕胎:一项卫生政策框架分析。
Public Health Chall. 2023 Jun 23;2(2):e101. doi: 10.1002/puh2.101. eCollection 2023 Jun.
3
Approaches to a crisis in early pregnancy: an explorative qualitative study of medical students and doctors in training in Ireland, using a story completion model.
早期妊娠危机的应对方法:一项对爱尔兰医学生和实习医生的探索性定性研究,采用故事完成模型。
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2024 Dec;32(1):2419150. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2024.2419150. Epub 2025 Jan 6.
4
Perceived Impact of Healthcare Relationships and Interactions on Parental Experiences of Prenatal Diagnosis and Termination of Pregnancy for Foetal Anomaly on the Island of Ireland.爱尔兰岛父母对产前诊断和终止妊娠以治疗胎儿异常的医疗保健关系和互动的感知影响。
Health Expect. 2024 Oct;27(5):e70068. doi: 10.1111/hex.70068.
5
: a qualitative study on providers' lived experiences with liberalised abortion care in the Republic of Ireland.: 一项关于爱尔兰共和国提供者在放宽堕胎护理方面的生活体验的定性研究。
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2023 Dec;31(1):2216526. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2023.2216526.
6
Improving measures of access to legal abortion: A validation study triangulating multiple data sources to assess a global indicator.提高合法堕胎机会的措施:一项验证研究,通过多种数据源的三角验证来评估全球指标。
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 13;18(1):e0280411. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280411. eCollection 2023.
7
The Opinions of Specialists in Obstetrics and Gynecology on the Indications for Pregnancy Termination in Poland-A Preliminary Cross-Sectional Study.波兰妇产科专家对终止妊娠适应证的意见——一项初步的横断面研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 1;19(19):12578. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191912578.
8
"The kind of doctor who doesn't believe doctor knows best": Doctors for Choice and the medical voice in Irish abortion politics, 2002-2018.“不相信医生最懂的医生”:选择医生与爱尔兰堕胎政治中的医学声音,2002-2018 年。
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Mar;297:114817. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114817. Epub 2022 Feb 16.
9
Abortion in Countries with Restrictive Abortion Laws-Possible Directions and Solutions from the Perspective of Poland.限制堕胎法国家的堕胎问题——从波兰视角看可能的方向与解决方案
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Nov 20;9(11):1594. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9111594.
10
The Influence of Abortion Law on the Frequency of Pregnancy Terminations-A Retrospective Comparative Study.堕胎法对堕胎频率的影响——一项回顾性比较研究
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 13;18(8):4099. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18084099.