Barry Conor, Ellingsen-Dalskau Kristian, Garmo Randi Therese, Grønmo Kischel Stine, Winckler Christoph, Kielland Camilla
Department of Production Animal Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, Norway.
Department for Animal Health, Animal Welfare and Food Safety, Norwegian Veterinary Institute, Ås, Norway.
Front Vet Sci. 2023 Feb 24;10:1125860. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1125860. eCollection 2023.
Knowing the national status of animal welfare, one can identify welfare problems and set a benchmark against which improvements can be compared. Such a status is potentially invaluable for tangible, sustained animal welfare improvement. The objective of this cross-sectional study was to report the status of animal welfare in Norwegian loose-housed dairy herds as assessed using the Welfare Quality Assessment Protocol. Additionally, we investigated if the welfare status varied on a regional basis.
In total, 155 herds in eight of Norway's eleven counties were assessed by six trained Welfare Quality assessors. This article presents the herd prevalences of common welfare issues in dairy production in Norway, as well as integrated welfare scores. To determine whether welfare status varied regionally in Norway, generalized linear modeling was used to estimate the mean welfare score for five regions in the four Welfare Quality principles: A. Good feeding, B. Good housing, C. Good health, and D. Appropriate behavior. These estimated mean welfare scores and their 95% confidence intervals were subsequently assessed for significant variation.
Encouraging findings included the low mean herd prevalence of 'very lean' cows (3.0%) and the high proportion of cows (59.8%) which could be touched during avoidance distance testing, indicating a positive relationship between stockpeople and their cattle. Challenges affecting the welfare of Norwegian dairy cows were also identified. Of particular concern were issues related to the cows' environment such as prolonged times needed to complete lying down movements and integument alterations. No herd was completely free of changes to the integument and, on average, 77.9% of each herd were affected either mildly or severely. Animal welfare did not appear to vary much between the five regions assessed. Our investigation revealed significant regional variation between two regions (Trøndelag and Vestlandet North) in only the Welfare Quality principle Good housing ( < 0.01).
The almost complete absence of regional variation demonstrates that animal welfare status generally varies most at herd level. In conclusion, both welfare challenges and encouraging findings were identified in loose-housed Norwegian dairy herds. To improve animal welfare, herd-specific interventions are most likely to be effective in these herds.
了解动物福利的国家状况,有助于识别福利问题,并设定一个可用于比较改进情况的基准。这样的状况对于切实、持续地改善动物福利可能具有极高的价值。这项横断面研究的目的是报告使用福利质量评估协议评估的挪威散养奶牛群的动物福利状况。此外,我们还调查了福利状况是否因地区而异。
挪威11个县中的8个县的155个牛群由6名经过培训的福利质量评估员进行了评估。本文介绍了挪威奶牛生产中常见福利问题的牛群患病率以及综合福利得分。为了确定挪威的福利状况是否因地区而异,我们使用广义线性模型来估计四个福利质量原则(A.良好饲养、B.良好住房、C.良好健康和D.适当行为)中五个地区的平均福利得分。随后对这些估计的平均福利得分及其95%置信区间进行显著差异评估。
令人鼓舞的发现包括“非常瘦”的奶牛平均牛群患病率较低(3.0%),以及在回避距离测试中可以被触摸的奶牛比例较高(59.8%),这表明饲养员与他们的牛之间存在积极关系。也发现了影响挪威奶牛福利的挑战。特别令人担忧的是与奶牛环境相关的问题,例如完成躺卧动作所需的时间延长和皮肤变化。没有一个牛群完全没有皮肤变化,平均每个牛群中有77.9%受到轻度或重度影响。在所评估的五个地区之间,动物福利似乎没有太大差异。我们的调查仅发现在“良好住房”这一福利质量原则方面,两个地区(特伦德拉格和西挪威北部)之间存在显著的地区差异(<0.01)。
几乎完全没有地区差异表明,动物福利状况通常在牛群层面变化最大。总之,在挪威散养奶牛群中既发现了福利挑战,也有令人鼓舞的发现。为了改善动物福利,针对特定牛群的干预措施在这些牛群中最有可能有效。