Department of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, 915 Greene Street, Columbia, SC 29208.
Department of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, 915 Greene Street, Columbia, SC 29208.
Contraception. 2019 Aug;100(2):165-171. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2019.04.007. Epub 2019 Apr 24.
We sought to examine women's experiences with immediate postpartum LARC counseling and use in the context of South Carolina's Medicaid policy.
In 2016-18, we conducted semi-structured individual interviews with 25 women, ages 18-35, who gave birth within 2 years of the interview in South Carolina while insured by Medicaid and received contraceptive counseling about immediate postpartum LARC during their pregnancies. We analyzed the interviews using a combination of deductive and inductive coding approaches.
Participants were counseled on immediate postpartum LARC during prenatal care (n=23) and/or while in the hospital for childbirth (n=16). Some expressed dissatisfaction with providers' approaches to contraceptive counseling because they either did not receive enough information to make a fully informed decision or felt they were being pressured to use LARC. Among those who received in-hospital contraceptive counseling, some objected to the timing because they were in labor and/or already had a non-LARC postpartum contraceptive plan. Three out of the 10 participants who elected to receive immediate postpartum LARC later desired removal but encountered barriers.
Our findings suggest providers' timing, style, and content of contraceptive counseling about immediate postpartum LARC may not be sufficiently patient-centered. Additionally, lack of access to unfettered LARC removal limits patients' reproductive autonomy.
If providers use a patient-centered approach to immediate postpartum LARC counseling, consistently engage in comprehensive contraceptive counseling during prenatal care, avoid pressuring patients to choose LARC, and collaborate with hospital staff to increase care coordination, they can improve Medicaid recipients' contraceptive care experiences and facilitate informed contraceptive decision-making.
我们旨在研究妇女在南卡罗来纳州医疗补助政策背景下接受即时产后长效可逆避孕(LARC)咨询和使用的经历。
2016 年至 2018 年,我们对 25 名年龄在 18-35 岁之间的女性进行了半结构化的个体访谈,这些女性在接受访谈的 2 年内在南卡罗来纳州分娩,在怀孕期间通过医疗补助获得了即时产后 LARC 避孕咨询。我们使用演绎和归纳编码方法相结合的方法分析了访谈内容。
参与者在产前护理期间(n=23)和/或在分娩期间在医院接受了即时产后 LARC 咨询(n=16)。一些人对提供者的避孕咨询方法表示不满,因为他们要么没有获得足够的信息来做出完全知情的决定,要么感到自己受到了使用 LARC 的压力。在接受医院内避孕咨询的人中,有些人反对这种时间安排,因为他们正在分娩和/或已经有了非 LARC 的产后避孕计划。10 名选择接受即时产后 LARC 的参与者中有 3 名后来希望取出,但遇到了障碍。
我们的研究结果表明,提供者关于即时产后 LARC 的避孕咨询的时间安排、方式和内容可能没有充分以患者为中心。此外,缺乏不受限制的 LARC 取出机会限制了患者的生殖自主权。
如果提供者采用以患者为中心的即时产后 LARC 咨询方法,在产前护理期间始终进行全面的避孕咨询,避免向患者施加选择 LARC 的压力,并与医院工作人员合作增加护理协调,他们可以改善医疗补助受助人的避孕护理体验,并促进知情避孕决策。