• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项采用前瞻性随机试验设计比较富血小板血浆注射与生理盐水治疗足底筋膜炎的可行性研究。

A Feasibility Study Comparing Platelet-Rich Plasma Injection With Saline for the Treatment of Plantar Fasciitis Using a Prospective, Randomized Trial Design.

作者信息

Johnson-Lynn Sarah, Cooney Alan, Ferguson Diarmaid, Bunn Deborah, Gray William, Coorsh Jonathan, Kakwani Rajesh, Townshend David

机构信息

Trauma and Orthopaedics, North Tyneside General Hospital, Tyne and Wear, UK.

出版信息

Foot Ankle Spec. 2019 Apr;12(2):153-158. doi: 10.1177/1938640018776065. Epub 2018 May 21.

DOI:10.1177/1938640018776065
PMID:29779399
Abstract

Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has been advocated for treatment of plantar fasciitis but there are few good-quality clinical trials to support its use. We conducted a feasibility study of PRP versus saline for treatment of plantar fasciitis. Patients with 6 months or more of magnetic resonance imaging-proven plantar fasciitis, who had failed conservative treatment were invited to participate in the study. Patients were block randomized to either PRP or an equivalent volume of saline. The techniques used for injection and rehabilitation were standardized for both groups. The patient and assessor were blinded. Visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain and painDETECT score were recorded preoperatively and at 6 months follow-up. From 35 patients approached, 28 (19 female, mean age 50 years) were recruited, with 14 randomized to each arm. At 6 months, 8 patients (28.6%) were lost to follow-up. There was a significant change in VAS score from baseline to follow-up in both intervention (mean change 37.2, P = .008) and control (mean change 42.2, P = .003) groups. There was no correlation between preoperative painDETECT score and change in VAS. Recruitment and loss to follow-up rates were relatively high. Both treatments resulted in a similar, significant, improvement in symptoms. Levels of Evidence: Level II.

摘要

富血小板血浆(PRP)已被提倡用于治疗足底筋膜炎,但支持其使用的高质量临床试验较少。我们进行了一项关于PRP与生理盐水治疗足底筋膜炎的可行性研究。邀请经磁共振成像证实患有足底筋膜炎6个月或更长时间且保守治疗失败的患者参与研究。患者被整群随机分为PRP组或等量生理盐水组。两组的注射和康复技术均标准化。患者和评估者均不知情。术前及随访6个月时记录疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分和疼痛DETECT评分。在35名被邀请的患者中,招募了28名(19名女性,平均年龄50岁),每组随机分配14名。6个月时,8名患者(28.6%)失访。干预组(平均变化37.2,P = .008)和对照组(平均变化42.2,P = .003)从基线到随访时VAS评分均有显著变化。术前疼痛DETECT评分与VAS变化之间无相关性。招募率和失访率相对较高。两种治疗均使症状得到了类似的显著改善。证据级别:II级。

相似文献

1
A Feasibility Study Comparing Platelet-Rich Plasma Injection With Saline for the Treatment of Plantar Fasciitis Using a Prospective, Randomized Trial Design.一项采用前瞻性随机试验设计比较富血小板血浆注射与生理盐水治疗足底筋膜炎的可行性研究。
Foot Ankle Spec. 2019 Apr;12(2):153-158. doi: 10.1177/1938640018776065. Epub 2018 May 21.
2
Platelet-Rich Plasma Has Better Long-Term Results Than Corticosteroids or Placebo for Chronic Plantar Fasciitis: Randomized Control Trial.对于慢性足底筋膜炎,富含血小板血浆比皮质类固醇或安慰剂具有更好的长期效果:随机对照试验。
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2019 Jan;58(1):42-46. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2018.07.006. Epub 2018 Nov 15.
3
Platelet rich plasma versus corticosteroid injection for plantar fasciitis: A comparative study.富血小板血浆与皮质类固醇注射治疗足底筋膜炎的比较研究
Foot (Edinb). 2015 Dec;25(4):235-7. doi: 10.1016/j.foot.2015.08.006. Epub 2015 Aug 22.
4
Clinical and imaging effects of corticosteroids and platelet-rich plasma for the treatment of chronic plantar fasciitis: A comparative non randomized prospective study.皮质类固醇和富血小板血浆治疗慢性足底筋膜炎的临床及影像学效果:一项非随机前瞻性对照研究
Foot Ankle Surg. 2019 Jun;25(3):354-360. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2018.01.005. Epub 2018 Feb 9.
5
Similar effect of ultrasound-guided platelet-rich plasma versus platelet-poor plasma injections for chronic plantar fasciitis.超声引导下富血小板血浆与贫血小板血浆注射治疗慢性足底筋膜炎的相似效果。
Foot (Edinb). 2019 Mar;38:30-33. doi: 10.1016/j.foot.2018.11.003. Epub 2018 Nov 28.
6
Positive Effect of Platelet-Rich Plasma on Pain in Plantar Fasciitis: A Double-Blind Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.富血小板血浆对足底筋膜炎疼痛的积极影响:一项双盲、多中心随机对照试验。
Am J Sports Med. 2019 Nov;47(13):3238-3246. doi: 10.1177/0363546519877181. Epub 2019 Oct 11.
7
Comparison of Plantar Fasciitis Injected With Platelet-Rich Plasma vs Corticosteroids.富血小板血浆注射与皮质类固醇注射治疗足底筋膜炎的比较
Foot Ankle Int. 2018 Jul;39(7):780-786. doi: 10.1177/1071100718762406. Epub 2018 Mar 30.
8
Chronic Plantar Fasciitis: Effect of Platelet-Rich Plasma, Corticosteroid, and Placebo.慢性足底筋膜炎:富血小板血浆、皮质类固醇和安慰剂的疗效
Orthopedics. 2016 Mar-Apr;39(2):e285-9. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20160222-01. Epub 2016 Feb 25.
9
Effectiveness of Four Different Treatment Modalities in the Treatment of Chronic Plantar Fasciitis During a 36-Month Follow-Up Period: A Randomized Controlled Trial.四种不同治疗方式在36个月随访期内治疗慢性足底筋膜炎的有效性:一项随机对照试验。
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2018 Sep-Oct;57(5):913-918. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2018.03.017.
10
Comparison of platelet-rich plasma and steroid injection in the treatment of plantar fasciitis.富血小板血浆与类固醇注射治疗足底筋膜炎的比较。
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2014;48(6):667-72. doi: 10.3944/AOTT.2014.13.0142.

引用本文的文献

1
The 'placebo effect' in the conservative treatment of plantar fasciitis: a systematic review and meta-analyses.足底筋膜炎保守治疗中的“安慰剂效应”:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
EFORT Open Rev. 2023 Oct 3;8(10):719-730. doi: 10.1530/EOR-23-0082.
2
Outcomes of platelet-rich plasma for plantar fasciopathy: a best-evidence synthesis.富含血小板的血浆治疗足底筋膜炎的疗效:最佳证据综合。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2020 Sep 21;15(1):432. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-01783-7.
3
Platelet Concentrates in Musculoskeletal Medicine.《肌肉骨骼医学中的血小板浓缩物》
Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Feb 16;21(4):1328. doi: 10.3390/ijms21041328.