Suppr超能文献

急性肺栓塞患者右心室应变的多模态评估。

Multimodality Assessment of Right Ventricular Strain in Patients With Acute Pulmonary Embolism.

机构信息

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Department of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Cardiovascular Division, Boston, Massachusetts.

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Radiology and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 2018 Jul 1;122(1):175-181. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2018.03.013. Epub 2018 Mar 28.

Abstract

Optimal risk stratification is essential in managing patients with an acute pulmonary embolism (PE). There are limited data evaluating the potential additive value of various methods of evaluation of right ventricular (RV) strain in PE. We retrospectively evaluated RV strain by computed tomography (CT), transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), electrocardiography (ECG), and troponin levels in consecutive hospitalized patients with acute PE (May 2007 to December 2014). Four-hundred and seventy-seven patients met inclusion criteria. RV strain on ECG (odds ratio [OR] 1.9, confidence interval [CI] 1.1 to 3.3; p = 0.03), CT (OR 2.7, CI 1.5 to 4.8, p <0.001), TTE (OR 2.8, CI 1.5 to 5.4, p <0.001), or a positive troponin (OR 2.7, CI 2.0 to 6.9, p <0.001) were associated with adverse events. In patients with ECG, CT, and TTE data, increased risk was only elevated with RV strain on all 3 parameters (OR 4.6, CI 1.8 to 11.3, p <0.001). In all patients with troponin measurements, risk was only elevated with RV strain on all 3 parameters plus a positive troponin (OR 8.8, CI 2.8 to 28.1, p <0.001) and was similar in intermediate-risk PE (OR 11.1, CI 1.2 to 103.8, p = 0.04). In conclusion, in patients with an acute PE and evaluation of RV strain by ECG, CT, and TTE, risk of adverse events is only elevated when RV strain is present on all 3 modalities. Troponin further aids in discriminating high-risk patients. Multimodality assessment of RV strain is identified as a superior approach to risk assessment.

摘要

在管理急性肺栓塞(PE)患者时,进行最佳风险分层至关重要。目前评估右心室(RV)应变各种评估方法在 PE 中的潜在附加价值的数据有限。我们回顾性评估了 2007 年 5 月至 2014 年 12 月连续住院的急性 PE 患者的 RV 应变,评估方法包括计算机断层扫描(CT)、经胸超声心动图(TTE)、心电图(ECG)和肌钙蛋白水平。共有 477 名患者符合纳入标准。ECG 上的 RV 应变(比值比 [OR] 1.9,置信区间 [CI] 1.1 至 3.3;p = 0.03)、CT(OR 2.7,CI 1.5 至 4.8,p <0.001)、TTE(OR 2.8,CI 1.5 至 5.4,p <0.001)或肌钙蛋白阳性(OR 2.7,CI 2.0 至 6.9,p <0.001)与不良事件相关。在有 ECG、CT 和 TTE 数据的患者中,仅当所有 3 项参数均存在 RV 应变时,风险才会升高(OR 4.6,CI 1.8 至 11.3,p <0.001)。在所有接受肌钙蛋白测量的患者中,仅当所有 3 项参数加肌钙蛋白阳性时 RV 应变才会升高(OR 8.8,CI 2.8 至 28.1,p <0.001),在中危 PE 中风险相似(OR 11.1,CI 1.2 至 103.8,p = 0.04)。总之,在急性 PE 患者中,通过 ECG、CT 和 TTE 评估 RV 应变时,只有当所有 3 种方法均存在 RV 应变时,不良事件的风险才会升高。肌钙蛋白进一步有助于区分高危患者。RV 应变的多模态评估被确定为一种优于风险评估的方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验