• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

电子健康就绪度框架:营养师视角

A framework for eHealth readiness of dietitians.

机构信息

School of Medicine, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia.

Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, Bruce, ACT 2601, Australia.

出版信息

Int J Med Inform. 2018 Jul;115:43-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2018.04.002. Epub 2018 Apr 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2018.04.002
PMID:29779719
Abstract

AIM

To develop a framework for assessing the eHealth readiness of dietitians.

METHODS

Using an inductive approach, this research was divided into three stages: 1. a systematic literature review to identify models or frameworks on eHealth readiness; 2. data synthesis to identify eHealth readiness themes and develop a framework; and 3. semi-structured interviews with Australian nutrition informatics experts to gain consensus and validate the framework.

RESULTS

Two hundred and forty one unique citations were identified, of which twenty four met the research criteria and were included in the review and subsequent synthesis. Common eHealth readiness themes or dimensions were extracted from the literature, and five key dimensions were identified that were relevant to dietitian eHealth readiness: access, standards, attitude, aptitude and advocacy. A framework diagram was designed and discussed during semi-structured interviews with ten nutrition informatics experts to inform the final framework. The result of this research was an inductively developed Framework for eHealth Readiness of Dietitians (FeRD).

DISCUSSION

The FeRD builds on existing theories and models, and provides a conceptual model for developing eHealth readiness evaluation tools to examine, measure and drive strategies to better prepare dietitian professionals for eHealth.

摘要

目的

制定一个评估营养师电子健康准备情况的框架。

方法

本研究采用归纳法,分为三个阶段:1. 系统文献综述,以确定电子健康准备情况的模型或框架;2. 数据综合,以确定电子健康准备情况的主题并制定框架;3. 对澳大利亚营养信息学专家进行半结构化访谈,以达成共识并验证框架。

结果

共确定了 241 条独特的引文,其中 24 条符合研究标准,并纳入了综述和随后的综合分析。从文献中提取了常见的电子健康准备主题或维度,并确定了与营养师电子健康准备相关的五个关键维度:访问、标准、态度、能力和倡导。设计了一个框架图,并在与十位营养信息学专家进行的半结构化访谈中进行了讨论,以完善最终框架。本研究的结果是一个归纳式的电子健康准备框架(FeRD)。

讨论

FeRD 建立在现有理论和模型的基础上,为开发电子健康准备情况评估工具提供了一个概念模型,以检验、衡量和推动策略,使营养师更好地为电子健康做好准备。

相似文献

1
A framework for eHealth readiness of dietitians.电子健康就绪度框架:营养师视角
Int J Med Inform. 2018 Jul;115:43-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2018.04.002. Epub 2018 Apr 13.
2
Strategic leadership will be essential for dietitian eHealth readiness: A qualitative study exploring dietitian perspectives of eHealth readiness.战略领导力对于营养师的电子健康准备至关重要:一项探索营养师对电子健康准备情况看法的定性研究。
Nutr Diet. 2019 Sep;76(4):373-381. doi: 10.1111/1747-0080.12434. Epub 2018 May 16.
3
eHealth readiness of dietitians.营养师的电子健康准备情况。
J Hum Nutr Diet. 2018 Aug;31(4):573-583. doi: 10.1111/jhn.12542. Epub 2018 Feb 23.
4
Development of an eHealth Readiness Assessment Framework for Botswana and Other Developing Countries: Interview Study.博茨瓦纳及其他发展中国家电子健康准备情况评估框架的制定:访谈研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2019 Aug 22;7(3):e12949. doi: 10.2196/12949.
5
Cost evaluation of providing evidence-based dietetic services for weight management in adults: In-person versus eHealth delivery.成人体重管理的循证饮食服务提供的成本评估:面对面与电子健康传递。
Nutr Diet. 2018 Feb;75(1):35-43. doi: 10.1111/1747-0080.12335. Epub 2017 Jan 24.
6
Protocol for a systematic review and qualitative synthesis of information quality frameworks in eHealth.电子健康信息质量框架的系统评价和定性综合研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Mar 5;9(3):e024722. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024722.
7
Emerging eHealth Directions in the Philippines.菲律宾新兴的电子健康发展方向。
Yearb Med Inform. 2012;7:144-52.
8
A holistic framework to improve the uptake and impact of eHealth technologies.一个用于提高电子健康技术的采用率和影响力的整体框架。
J Med Internet Res. 2011 Dec 5;13(4):e111. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1672.
9
Towards Developing an eHealth Equity Conceptual Framework.迈向电子健康公平概念框架的发展
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2019;257:24-30.
10
eHealth policy framework in Low and Lower Middle-Income Countries; a PRISMA systematic review and analysis.中低收入国家的电子健康政策框架:PRISMA 系统评价和分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Apr 1;23(1):328. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09325-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Prevalence of emotional burnout among dietitians and nutritionists: a systematic review, meta-analysis, meta-regression, and a call for action.营养师和营养学家中情绪倦怠的患病率:一项系统评价、荟萃分析、元回归及行动呼吁
BMC Psychol. 2024 Dec 23;12(1):775. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-02290-8.
2
Determinants of Acceptance of Weight Management Applications in Overweight and Obese Individuals: Using an Extended Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology Model.超重和肥胖个体对体重管理应用程序接受度的决定因素:利用扩展的接受和使用技术统一理论模型。
Nutrients. 2022 May 8;14(9):1968. doi: 10.3390/nu14091968.
3
Factors Influencing Telehealth Implementation and Use in Frontier Critical Access Hospitals: Qualitative Study.
影响偏远地区急救医院远程医疗实施与应用的因素:定性研究
JMIR Form Res. 2021 May 5;5(5):e24118. doi: 10.2196/24118.
4
Mobile Apps for Weight Management: A Review of the Latest Evidence to Inform Practice.移动应用程序在体重管理中的应用:最新证据综述,以指导实践。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2020 Jun 24;11:412. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2020.00412. eCollection 2020.