Zhang Hong-Tian, Chen Li-Hua, Bai Miao-Chun, Xu Ru-Xiang
The Affiliated Bayi Brain Hospital, PLA General Hospital, 100700 Beijng, China.
The Affiliated Bayi Brain Hospital, PLA General Hospital, 100700 Beijng, China.
J Clin Neurosci. 2018 Aug;54:20-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2018.04.063. Epub 2018 May 18.
The efficacy and safety of surgery for patients with primary pontine hemorrhage (PPH) remain debatable. Twenty-eight consecutive patients with huge upper PPH were included in this study. They underwent surgical management through a subtemporal approach between January 2009 and October 2013. We analyzed clinical and radiological parameters to assess the patient outcomes. The near-complete (>90%) evacuation rate was 67.9%, and there was no surgery-related death. The overall survival rate at 3 months was 64.3% (17/28), including 28.6% (8/28) with good function, 10.7% (3/28) with disability and 25% (7/28) in a vegetative state. The mortality rate was 35.7% (10/28). Preoperative hemorrhage volume (P = 0.019), preoperative (P = 0.017) and postoperative (P = 0.001) Glasgow coma scale (GCS) score, coma on admission (P = 0.001), ventricular extension (P = 0.001), preoperative mechanical ventilation (P = 0.001) and hydrocephalus (P = 0.007) were found to be statistically significant predictors for mortality on univariate analysis. On multivariate regression analysis, only GCS on admission and coma were found to be significant prognostic predictors. The subtemporal approach was found to be a safe method to treat upper PPH. Microsurgery may be beneficial for the treatment of PPH, but these results need further validation in a more comprehensive and comparative study. GCS on admission and coma were found to be the only significant prognostic predictors for mortality with multivariate regression analysis.
原发性脑桥出血(PPH)患者手术的疗效和安全性仍存在争议。本研究纳入了28例连续性巨大脑桥上段出血患者。2009年1月至2013年10月期间,他们接受了经颞下入路的手术治疗。我们分析了临床和影像学参数以评估患者的预后。近完全(>90%)清除率为67.9%,且无手术相关死亡。3个月时的总生存率为64.3%(17/28),其中功能良好者占28.6%(8/28),残疾者占10.7%(3/28),植物状态者占25%(7/28)。死亡率为35.7%(10/28)。单因素分析发现,术前出血量(P = 0.019)、术前(P = 0.017)和术后(P = 0.001)格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)评分、入院时昏迷(P = 0.001)、脑室扩展(P = 0.001)、术前机械通气(P = 0.001)和脑积水(P = 0.007)是死亡率的统计学显著预测因素。多因素回归分析发现,仅入院时GCS评分和昏迷是显著的预后预测因素。经颞下入路被发现是治疗脑桥上段出血的安全方法。显微手术可能对PPH的治疗有益,但这些结果需要在更全面和比较性的研究中进一步验证。多因素回归分析发现,入院时GCS评分和昏迷是死亡率仅有的显著预后预测因素。