• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为什么竹子的叶重-面积异速生长不遵循3/2幂定律?

Why Does Not the Leaf Weight-Area Allometry of Bamboos Follow the 3/2-Power Law?

作者信息

Lin Shuyan, Shao Lijuan, Hui Cang, Song Yu, Reddy Gadi V P, Gielis Johan, Li Fang, Ding Yulong, Wei Qiang, Shi Peijian

机构信息

Co-Innovation Centre for Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, Bamboo Research Institute, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, China.

Department of Mathematical Sciences, Centre for Invasion Biology, African Institute for Mathematical Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Matieland, South Africa.

出版信息

Front Plant Sci. 2018 May 4;9:583. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00583. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.3389/fpls.2018.00583
PMID:29780397
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5945892/
Abstract

The principle of similarity (Thompson, 1917) states that the weight of an organism follows the 3/2-power law of its surface area and is proportional to its volume on the condition that the density is constant. However, the allometric relationship between leaf weight and leaf area has been reported to greatly deviate from the 3/2-power law, with the irregularity of leaf density largely ignored for explaining this deviation. Here, we choose 11 bamboo species to explore the allometric relationships among leaf area (), density (ρ), length (), thickness (), and weight (). Because the edge of a bamboo leaf follows a simplified two-parameter Gielis equation, we could show that ∝ and that ∝ . This then allowed us to derive the density-thickness allometry ρ ∝ and the weight-area allometry ∝ ≈ , where approximates -3/4. Leaf density is strikingly negatively associated with leaf thickness, and it is this inverse relationship that results in the weight-area allometry to deviate from the 3/2-power law. In conclusion, although plants are prone to invest less dry mass and thus produce thinner leaves when the leaf area is sufficient for photosynthesis, such leaf thinning needs to be accompanied with elevated density to ensure structural stability. The findings provide the insights on the evolutionary clue about the biomass investment and output of photosynthetic organs of plants. Because of the importance of leaves, plants could have enhanced the ratio of dry material per unit area of leaf in order to increase the efficiency of photosynthesis, relative the other parts of plants. Although the conclusion is drawn only based on 11 bamboo species, it should also be applicable to the other plants, especially considering previous works on the exponent of the weight-area relationship being less than 3/2 in plants.

摘要

相似性原理(汤普森,1917年)指出,在密度恒定的条件下,生物体的重量遵循其表面积的3/2幂定律,且与体积成正比。然而,据报道,叶重与叶面积之间的异速生长关系与3/2幂定律有很大偏差,叶密度的不规则性在很大程度上被忽视,未被用于解释这种偏差。在这里,我们选择了11种竹子来探究叶面积()、密度(ρ)、长度()、厚度()和重量()之间的异速生长关系。由于竹叶边缘遵循简化的双参数吉列斯方程,我们可以证明 ∝ 且 ∝ 。这进而使我们能够推导出密度-厚度异速生长关系 ρ ∝ 以及重量-面积异速生长关系 ∝ ≈ ,其中 近似为-3/4。叶密度与叶厚度显著负相关,正是这种反比关系导致重量-面积异速生长关系偏离3/2幂定律。总之,虽然当叶面积足以进行光合作用时,植物倾向于投入较少的干物质,从而产生较薄的叶子,但这种叶片变薄需要伴随着密度的增加以确保结构稳定性。这些发现为植物光合器官生物量投资和产出的进化线索提供了见解。由于叶子的重要性,相对于植物的其他部分,植物可能提高了单位叶面积的干物质比例,以提高光合作用效率。尽管该结论仅基于11种竹子得出,但考虑到之前关于植物重量-面积关系指数小于3/2的研究,它也应该适用于其他植物。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e990/5945892/ac968b06d0f6/fpls-09-00583-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e990/5945892/adc98f65e645/fpls-09-00583-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e990/5945892/f0318b3f421a/fpls-09-00583-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e990/5945892/aba62dcb9324/fpls-09-00583-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e990/5945892/91c354f3db76/fpls-09-00583-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e990/5945892/7cb972009792/fpls-09-00583-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e990/5945892/ac968b06d0f6/fpls-09-00583-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e990/5945892/adc98f65e645/fpls-09-00583-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e990/5945892/f0318b3f421a/fpls-09-00583-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e990/5945892/aba62dcb9324/fpls-09-00583-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e990/5945892/91c354f3db76/fpls-09-00583-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e990/5945892/7cb972009792/fpls-09-00583-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e990/5945892/ac968b06d0f6/fpls-09-00583-g0006.jpg

相似文献

1
Why Does Not the Leaf Weight-Area Allometry of Bamboos Follow the 3/2-Power Law?为什么竹子的叶重-面积异速生长不遵循3/2幂定律?
Front Plant Sci. 2018 May 4;9:583. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00583. eCollection 2018.
2
Comparison of dwarf bamboos (Indocalamus sp.) leaf parameters to determine relationship between spatial density of plants and total leaf area per plant.比较矮竹(箬竹属)叶片参数以确定植株空间密度与单株总叶面积之间的关系。
Ecol Evol. 2015 Sep 30;5(20):4578-89. doi: 10.1002/ece3.1728. eCollection 2015 Oct.
3
Altitudinal Patterns of Leaf Traits and Leaf Allometry in Bamboo .竹子叶片性状和叶异速生长的海拔格局
Front Plant Sci. 2018 Jul 31;9:1110. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01110. eCollection 2018.
4
Scaling relationships between the total number of leaves and the total leaf area per culm of two dwarf bamboo species.两种矮竹每茎杆叶片总数与总叶面积之间的比例关系。
Ecol Evol. 2024 Jul 15;14(7):e70002. doi: 10.1002/ece3.70002. eCollection 2024 Jul.
5
Tradeoff between Stem Hydraulic Efficiency and Mechanical Strength Affects Leaf-Stem Allometry in 28 Tree Species.28种树木茎干水力效率与机械强度之间的权衡影响叶-茎异速生长
Front Plant Sci. 2017 Sep 20;8:1619. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01619. eCollection 2017.
6
A geometrical model for testing bilateral symmetry of bamboo leaf with a simplified Gielis equation.一种用于用简化的吉列斯方程测试竹叶双侧对称性的几何模型。
Ecol Evol. 2016 Sep 1;6(19):6798-6806. doi: 10.1002/ece3.2407. eCollection 2016 Oct.
7
Effects of elevated CO and temperature on growth and allometry of five native fast-growing annual species.二氧化碳浓度升高和温度升高对五种本地一年生速生植物生长和异速生长的影响。
New Phytol. 1998 Oct;140(2):343-354. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-8137.1998.00273.x.
8
[Allometry between twig size and leaf size of typical bamboo species along an altitudinal gradient].典型竹种小枝大小与叶片大小沿海拔梯度的异速生长关系
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2019 Jan 20;30(1):165-172. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201901.029.
9
The morphology and nutrient content drive the leaf carbon capture and economic trait variations in subtropical bamboo forest.形态特征和养分含量驱动亚热带竹林叶片碳捕获及经济性状变异。
Front Plant Sci. 2023 Apr 4;14:1137487. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1137487. eCollection 2023.
10
Photosynthetic activity, chloroplast ultrastructure, and leaf characteristics of high-light and low-light plants and of sun and shade leaves.高光和低光植物以及阳生叶和阴生叶的光合活性、叶绿体超微结构和叶片特征。
Photosynth Res. 1981 Jun;2(2):115-41. doi: 10.1007/BF00028752.

引用本文的文献

1
Scaling Relationships and Sexual Size Dimorphism Among the Body Parts of (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae).(鞘翅目:金龟科)身体各部位之间的比例关系与两性异形
Ecol Evol. 2025 Jul 8;15(7):e71760. doi: 10.1002/ece3.71760. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Variation of leaf shape with tree size: a case study using Decne.叶片形状随树木大小的变化:以Decne.为例的案例研究
Front Plant Sci. 2024 Nov 20;15:1468483. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1468483. eCollection 2024.
3
Leaf functional traits of from different environments in eastern China.中国东部不同环境下的叶片功能性状。 (你提供的原文“Leaf functional traits of from different environments in eastern China.”表述似乎不完整,这里推测完整表述后进行的翻译,原句中“of”后面应该还有具体主体)

本文引用的文献

1
Functional leaf attributes predict litter decomposition rate in herbaceous plants.功能性叶片属性可预测草本植物的凋落物分解速率。
New Phytol. 1997 Jan;135(1):109-114. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-8137.1997.00628.x.
2
Short Communication: Leaf trait relationships in Australian plant species.短讯:澳大利亚植物物种的叶片性状关系
Funct Plant Biol. 2004 Jun;31(5):551-558. doi: 10.1071/FP03212.
3
A geometrical model for testing bilateral symmetry of bamboo leaf with a simplified Gielis equation.一种用于用简化的吉列斯方程测试竹叶双侧对称性的几何模型。
Plant Environ Interact. 2024 Aug 24;5(4):e70001. doi: 10.1002/pei3.70001. eCollection 2024 Aug.
4
Diminishing returns: A comparison between fresh mass vs. area and dry mass vs. area in deciduous species.收益递减:落叶树种鲜质量与面积以及干质量与面积的比较。
Front Plant Sci. 2022 Oct 4;13:832300. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.832300. eCollection 2022.
5
Accelerating leaf area measurement using a volumetric approach.使用容积法加速叶面积测量。
Plant Methods. 2022 May 9;18(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s13007-022-00896-w.
6
Application of an Ovate Leaf Shape Model to Evaluate Leaf Bilateral Asymmetry and Calculate Lamina Centroid Location.卵形叶形状模型在评估叶片双侧不对称性及计算叶片质心位置中的应用
Front Plant Sci. 2022 Jan 17;12:822907. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.822907. eCollection 2021.
Ecol Evol. 2016 Sep 1;6(19):6798-6806. doi: 10.1002/ece3.2407. eCollection 2016 Oct.
4
Leaf specific mass confounds leaf density and thickness.叶片比质量混淆了叶片密度和厚度。
Oecologia. 1991 Dec;88(4):486-493. doi: 10.1007/BF00317710.
5
Leaf structure and anatomy as related to leaf mass per area variation in seedlings of a wide range of woody plant species and types.与多种木本植物物种和类型的幼苗叶面积质量变化相关的叶片结构与解剖学
Oecologia. 2000 Sep;124(4):476-486. doi: 10.1007/PL00008873.
6
The anatomical and compositional basis of leaf mass per area.单位叶面积质量的解剖学和组成基础。
Ecol Lett. 2017 Apr;20(4):412-425. doi: 10.1111/ele.12739. Epub 2017 Feb 14.
7
Leaf thickness controls variation in leaf mass per area (LMA) among grazing-adapted grasses in Serengeti.叶片厚度控制着塞伦盖蒂适应放牧的草类之间单位面积叶质量(LMA)的变化。
Oecologia. 2016 Aug;181(4):1035-40. doi: 10.1007/s00442-016-3632-3. Epub 2016 Apr 20.
8
Leaf density explains variation in leaf mass per area in rice between cultivars and nitrogen treatments.叶片密度解释了不同品种和施氮处理下水稻叶片单位面积质量的差异。
Ann Bot. 2016 May;117(6):963-71. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcw022. Epub 2016 Mar 26.
9
Comparison of dwarf bamboos (Indocalamus sp.) leaf parameters to determine relationship between spatial density of plants and total leaf area per plant.比较矮竹(箬竹属)叶片参数以确定植株空间密度与单株总叶面积之间的关系。
Ecol Evol. 2015 Sep 30;5(20):4578-89. doi: 10.1002/ece3.1728. eCollection 2015 Oct.
10
The scaling relationships between leaf mass and leaf area of vascular plant species change with altitude.维管植物物种的叶质量和叶面积之间的比例关系随海拔高度而变化。
PLoS One. 2013 Oct 11;8(10):e76872. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0076872. eCollection 2013.