Haghshenas Abbas, Emam Yahya
Department of Plant Production and Genetics, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran.
Plant Methods. 2022 May 9;18(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s13007-022-00896-w.
Despite the advances in the techniques of indirect estimation of leaf area, the destructive measurement approaches have still remained as the reference and the most accurate methods. However, even utilizing the modern sensors and applications usually requires the laborious and time-consuming practice of unfolding and analyzing the single leaves, separately. In the present study, a volumetric approach was tested to determine the pile leaf area based on the ratio of leaf volume divided by thickness. For this purpose, the suspension technique was used for volumetry, which is based on the simple practice and calculations of the Archimedes' principle.
Wheat volumetric leaf area (VLA), had a high agreement and approximately 1:1 correlation with the conventionally measured optical leaf area (OLA). Exclusion of the midrib volume from calculations, did not affect the estimation error (NRMSE < 2.61%); however, improved the slope of the linear model by about 6%, and also reduced the bias between the methods. The error of sampling for determining mean leaf thickness of the pile, was also less than 2% throughout the season. Besides, a more practical and facilitated version of pile volumetry was tested using Specific Gravity Bench (SGB), which is currently available as a laboratory equipment. As an important observation, which was also expectable according to the leaf 3D expansion (i.e., in a given 2D plane), it was evidenced that the variations in the OLA exactly follows the pattern of the changes in the leaf volume. Accordingly, it was suggested that the relative leaf areas of various experimental treatments might be compared directly based on volume, and independently of leaf thickness. Furthermore, no considerable difference was observed among the OLAs measured using various image resolutions (NRMSE < 0.212%); which indicates that even the superfast scanners with low resolutions as 200 dpi may be used for a precision optical measurement of leaf area.
It is expected that utilizing the reliable and simple concept of volumetric leaf area, based on which the measurement time might be independent of sample size, facilitate the laborious practice of leaf area measurement; and consequently, improve the precision of field experiments.
尽管间接估计叶面积的技术取得了进展,但破坏性测量方法仍然是参考方法和最准确的方法。然而,即使使用现代传感器和应用程序,通常也需要分别对单叶进行展开和分析,这一过程既费力又耗时。在本研究中,测试了一种基于叶体积与厚度之比来确定堆叶面积的体积法。为此,采用了基于阿基米德原理简单操作和计算的悬浮技术进行体积测量。
小麦体积叶面积(VLA)与传统测量的光学叶面积(OLA)高度一致,且具有近似1:1的相关性。在计算中排除中脉体积,不会影响估计误差(归一化均方根误差<2.61%);然而,这使线性模型的斜率提高了约6%,并减少了两种方法之间的偏差。在整个季节中,用于确定堆叶平均厚度的采样误差也小于2%。此外,还使用比重台(SGB)测试了一种更实用、更简便的堆体积测量方法,SGB目前是一种实验室设备。作为一个重要的观察结果,根据叶片的三维扩展(即在给定的二维平面中)这也是可以预期的,结果表明OLA的变化完全遵循叶体积变化的模式。因此,建议可以直接基于体积比较各种实验处理的相对叶面积,而无需考虑叶厚度。此外,使用不同图像分辨率测量的OLA之间未观察到显著差异(归一化均方根误差<0.212%);这表明即使是分辨率低至200 dpi的超快速扫描仪也可用于叶面积的精确光学测量。
预计采用可靠且简单的体积叶面积概念,基于该概念测量时间可能与样本大小无关,将有助于简化叶面积测量的繁琐操作;从而提高田间试验的精度。