• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

作为学习经历的选拔:一项探索性研究。

Selection as a learning experience: an exploratory study.

作者信息

de Visser Marieke, Laan Roland F, Engbers Rik, Cohen-Schotanus Janke, Fluit Cornelia

机构信息

Department for Research in Learning and Education, Radboudumc Health Academy, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Center for Research and Innovation in Medical Education, University of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Adv Med Educ Pract. 2018 May 10;9:345-355. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S164446. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.2147/AMEP.S164446
PMID:29785147
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5953412/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Research on selection for medical school does not explore selection as a learning experience, despite growing attention for the learning effects of assessment in general. Insight in the learning effects allows us to take advantage of selection as an inclusive part of medical students' learning process to become competent professionals. The aims of this study at Radboud University Medical Center, the Netherlands, were 1) to determine whether students have learning experiences in the selection process, and, if so, what experiences; and 2) to understand what students need in order to utilize the learning effects of the selection process at the start of the formal curriculum.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We used focus groups to interview 30 students admitted in 2016 about their learning experiences in the selection process. Thematic analysis was used to explore the outcomes of the interviews and to define relevant themes.

RESULTS

In the selection process, students learned about the curriculum, themselves, their relation to others, and the profession they had been selected to enter, although this was not explicitly perceived as learning. Students needed a connection between selection and the curriculum as well as feedback to be able to really use their learning experiences for their further development.

DISCUSSION

Medical school selection qualifies as a learning experience, and students as well as medical schools can take advantage of this. We recommend a careful design of the selection procedure, integrating relevant selection learning experiences into the formal curriculum, providing feedback and explicitly approaching the selection and the formal curriculum as interconnected contributors to students' development.

摘要

引言

尽管人们普遍越来越关注评估的学习效果,但关于医学院校选拔的研究并未将选拔视为一种学习经历。深入了解学习效果能让我们将选拔作为医学生学习过程中不可或缺的一部分加以利用,从而使其成为合格的专业人员。荷兰拉德堡德大学医学中心开展这项研究的目的是:1)确定学生在选拔过程中是否有学习经历,若有,是哪些经历;2)了解学生在正式课程开始时需要什么,以便利用选拔过程的学习效果。

材料与方法

我们采用焦点小组访谈法,对2016年入学的30名学生进行访谈,了解他们在选拔过程中的学习经历。采用主题分析法探究访谈结果并确定相关主题。

结果

在选拔过程中,学生了解了课程、自身、他们与他人的关系以及他们所选入的专业,尽管这并未被明确视为学习。学生需要选拔与课程之间建立联系以及获得反馈,以便能够真正将他们的学习经历用于自身的进一步发展。

讨论

医学院校选拔可被视为一种学习经历,学生和医学院校都能从中受益。我们建议精心设计选拔程序,将相关的选拔学习经历融入正式课程,提供反馈,并明确将选拔和正式课程视为学生发展的相互关联的促进因素。

相似文献

1
Selection as a learning experience: an exploratory study.作为学习经历的选拔:一项探索性研究。
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2018 May 10;9:345-355. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S164446. eCollection 2018.
2
Medical professionalism in the formal curriculum: 5th year medical students' experiences.正规课程中的医学职业精神:五年级医学生的经历
BMC Med Educ. 2014 Nov 30;14:259. doi: 10.1186/s12909-014-0259-0.
3
Students' perceptions of effective learning experiences in dental school: a qualitative study using a critical incident technique.牙科学生对牙科学院有效学习经历的认知:一项运用关键事件技术的定性研究
J Dent Educ. 2006 Feb;70(2):124-32.
4
The effect of curriculum sample selection for medical school.医学院课程样本选择的效果。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2017 Mar;22(1):43-56. doi: 10.1007/s10459-016-9681-x. Epub 2016 Apr 23.
5
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.基于母婴模拟学习的学生和教育工作者体验:定性证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.
6
In the students' own words: what are the strengths and weaknesses of the dental school curriculum?用学生自己的话来说:牙科学院课程的优点和缺点是什么?
J Dent Educ. 2007 May;71(5):632-45.
7
Service-Learning Programs and Projects for Medical Students Engaged With the Community.面向参与社区活动的医学生的服务学习项目与计划
Cureus. 2022 Jun 24;14(6):e26279. doi: 10.7759/cureus.26279. eCollection 2022 Jun.
8
The effects of a non-cognitive versus cognitive admission procedure within cohorts in one medical school.一所医学院内的两个队列中采用非认知与认知入院程序的效果。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2018 Mar;23(1):187-200. doi: 10.1007/s10459-017-9782-1. Epub 2017 Jun 10.
9
Medical Students' Professional Development as Educators Revealed Through Reflections on Their Teaching Following a Students-as-Teachers Course.通过医学生作为教师课程后的教学反思揭示医学生作为教育者的专业发展
Teach Learn Med. 2017 Oct-Dec;29(4):411-419. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2017.1302801. Epub 2017 May 12.
10
Exploring conceptual and theoretical frameworks for nurse practitioner education: a scoping review protocol.探索执业护士教育的概念和理论框架:一项范围综述方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):146-55. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2150.

引用本文的文献

1
Selection and lottery in medical school admissions: who gains and who loses?医学院招生中的选拔与抽签:谁受益谁受损?
MedEdPublish (2016). 2018 Dec 4;7:271. doi: 10.15694/mep.2018.0000271.1. eCollection 2018.

本文引用的文献

1
Costs and assessment in medical education: a strategic view.医学教育中的成本与评估:一种战略视角
Perspect Med Educ. 2016 Oct;5(5):265-7. doi: 10.1007/s40037-016-0299-8.
2
The effect of curriculum sample selection for medical school.医学院课程样本选择的效果。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2017 Mar;22(1):43-56. doi: 10.1007/s10459-016-9681-x. Epub 2016 Apr 23.
3
How effective are selection methods in medical education? A systematic review.医学教育中的选择方法有多有效?系统评价。
Med Educ. 2016 Jan;50(1):36-60. doi: 10.1111/medu.12817.
4
Towards a program of assessment for health professionals: from training into practice.迈向健康专业人员评估计划:从培训到实践。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2016 Oct;21(4):897-913. doi: 10.1007/s10459-015-9653-6. Epub 2015 Nov 21.
5
Is assessment good for learning or learning good for assessment? A. Both? B. Neither? C. It depends?评估对学习有益还是学习对评估有益?A. 两者都有益?B. 两者都无益?C. 视情况而定?
Perspect Med Educ. 2015 Dec;4(6):280-281. doi: 10.1007/s40037-015-0229-1.
6
Situational judgement tests in medical education and training: Research, theory and practice: AMEE Guide No. 100.医学教育与培训中的情境判断测试:研究、理论与实践:AMEE指南第100号
Med Teach. 2016;38(1):3-17. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2015.1072619. Epub 2015 Aug 27.
7
The impact of programmatic assessment on student learning: theory versus practice.程序化评估对学生学习的影响:理论与实践
Med Educ. 2015 May;49(5):487-98. doi: 10.1111/medu.12645.
8
The social validity of a national assessment centre for selection into general practice training.一个用于选拔进入全科医学培训的国家评估中心的社会效度。
BMC Med Educ. 2014 Dec 21;14:261. doi: 10.1186/s12909-014-0261-6.
9
Twelve Tips for programmatic assessment.程序化评估的十二条建议。
Med Teach. 2015 Jul;37(7):641-646. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2014.973388. Epub 2014 Nov 20.
10
Using focus groups in medical education research: AMEE Guide No. 91.医学教育研究中焦点小组的运用:医学教育促进与研究协会指南第91号
Med Teach. 2014 Nov;36(11):923-39. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2014.917165. Epub 2014 Jul 29.