• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

非高斯方法在因果结构学习中的应用。

Non-Gaussian Methods for Causal Structure Learning.

机构信息

Faculty of Data Science, Shiga University, Hikone, Japan.

The RIKEN Center for Advanced Intelligence Project, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Prev Sci. 2019 Apr;20(3):431-441. doi: 10.1007/s11121-018-0901-x.

DOI:10.1007/s11121-018-0901-x
PMID:29789997
Abstract

Causal structure learning is one of the most exciting new topics in the fields of machine learning and statistics. In many empirical sciences including prevention science, the causal mechanisms underlying various phenomena need to be studied. Nevertheless, in many cases, classical methods for causal structure learning are not capable of estimating the causal structure of variables. This is because it explicitly or implicitly assumes Gaussianity of data and typically utilizes only the covariance structure. In many applications, however, non-Gaussian data are often obtained, which means that more information may be contained in the data distribution than the covariance matrix is capable of containing. Thus, many new methods have recently been proposed for using the non-Gaussian structure of data and inferring the causal structure of variables. This paper introduces prevention scientists to such causal structure learning methods, particularly those based on the linear, non-Gaussian, acyclic model known as LiNGAM. These non-Gaussian data analysis tools can fully estimate the underlying causal structures of variables under assumptions even in the presence of unobserved common causes. This feature is in contrast to other approaches. A simulated example is also provided.

摘要

因果结构学习是机器学习和统计学领域中最令人兴奋的新主题之一。在包括预防科学在内的许多实证科学中,都需要研究各种现象背后的因果机制。然而,在许多情况下,经典的因果结构学习方法无法估计变量的因果结构。这是因为它明确或隐含地假设数据的正态性,并且通常仅利用协方差结构。然而,在许多应用中,通常会获得非正态数据,这意味着数据分布中可能包含比协方差矩阵所能包含的更多信息。因此,最近提出了许多新的方法来利用数据的非正态结构并推断变量的因果结构。本文向预防科学家介绍了这种因果结构学习方法,特别是基于线性、非正态、无环模型(称为 LiNGAM)的方法。这些非正态数据分析工具可以在假设条件下,甚至在存在未观测到的共同原因的情况下,充分估计变量的潜在因果结构。这一特点与其他方法形成对比。还提供了一个模拟示例。

相似文献

1
Non-Gaussian Methods for Causal Structure Learning.非高斯方法在因果结构学习中的应用。
Prev Sci. 2019 Apr;20(3):431-441. doi: 10.1007/s11121-018-0901-x.
2
Pairwise Likelihood Ratios for Estimation of Non-Gaussian Structural Equation Models.用于估计非高斯结构方程模型的成对似然比
J Mach Learn Res. 2013 Jan;14(Jan):111-152.
3
Causality in linear nongaussian acyclic models in the presence of latent gaussian confounders.存在潜在高斯混杂因素时线性非高斯非循环模型中的因果关系。
Neural Comput. 2013 Jun;25(6):1605-41. doi: 10.1162/NECO_a_00444. Epub 2013 Mar 21.
4
Covariate selection in causal learning under non-Gaussianity.在非正态性下因果学习中的协变量选择。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Apr;56(4):4019-4037. doi: 10.3758/s13428-023-02217-y. Epub 2023 Sep 13.
5
Solving the puzzle of quality of life in cancer: integrating causal inference and machine learning for data-driven insights.破解癌症患者生活质量之谜:整合因果推断与机器学习以获取数据驱动的见解。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2024 Aug 7;22(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s12955-024-02274-7.
6
An Efficient Entropy-Based Causal Discovery Method for Linear Structural Equation Models With IID Noise Variables.一种适用于具有独立同分布噪声变量的线性结构方程模型的基于熵的高效因果发现方法。
IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst. 2020 May;31(5):1667-1680. doi: 10.1109/TNNLS.2019.2921613. Epub 2019 Jul 3.
7
Advances in Statistical Methods for Causal Inference in Prevention Science: Introduction to the Special Section.统计方法在预防科学中因果推断的进展:特刊介绍。
Prev Sci. 2019 Apr;20(3):390-393. doi: 10.1007/s11121-019-0978-x.
8
Testability of Instrumental Variables in Linear Non-Gaussian Acyclic Causal Models.线性非高斯无环因果模型中工具变量的可检验性
Entropy (Basel). 2022 Apr 5;24(4):512. doi: 10.3390/e24040512.
9
A multivariate additive noise model for complete causal discovery.一种完整因果发现的多元加性噪声模型。
Neural Netw. 2018 Jul;103:44-54. doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2018.03.013. Epub 2018 Mar 26.
10
A pooling-LiNGAM algorithm for effective connectivity analysis of fMRI data.一种用于 fMRI 数据有效连接分析的池化-LiNGAM 算法。
Front Comput Neurosci. 2014 Oct 6;8:125. doi: 10.3389/fncom.2014.00125. eCollection 2014.

引用本文的文献

1
Validation of causal inference data using DirectLiNGAM in an environmental small-scale model and calculation settings.在环境小规模模型和计算设置中使用DirectLiNGAM对因果推断数据进行验证。
MethodsX. 2023 Dec 20;12:102528. doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2023.102528. eCollection 2024 Jun.
2
Detecting heterogeneity in the causal direction of dependence: A model-based recursive partitioning approach.检测依赖因果方向中的异质性:一种基于模型的递归划分方法。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Apr;56(4):2711-2730. doi: 10.3758/s13428-023-02253-8. Epub 2023 Oct 19.
3
Leveraging "big data" in respiratory medicine - data science, causal inference, and precision medicine.

本文引用的文献

1
Bayesian Estimation of Causal Direction in Acyclic Structural Equation Models with Individual-specific Confounder Variables and Non-Gaussian Distributions.具有个体特定混杂变量和非高斯分布的无环结构方程模型中因果方向的贝叶斯估计
J Mach Learn Res. 2014 Aug;15:2629-2652.
2
Causal discovery and inference: concepts and recent methodological advances.因果发现与推断:概念及近期方法进展
Appl Inform (Berl). 2016;3:3. doi: 10.1186/s40535-016-0018-x. Epub 2016 Feb 18.
3
Brain network response underlying decisions about abstract reinforcers.
利用呼吸医学中的“大数据”——数据科学、因果推断与精准医学。
Expert Rev Respir Med. 2021 Jun;15(6):717-721. doi: 10.1080/17476348.2021.1913061. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
4
Improving Mental Health Services: A 50-Year Journey from Randomized Experiments to Artificial Intelligence and Precision Mental Health.改善心理健康服务:从随机试验到人工智能和精准心理健康的 50 年历程。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2020 Sep;47(5):795-843. doi: 10.1007/s10488-020-01065-8.
5
Advances in Statistical Methods for Causal Inference in Prevention Science: Introduction to the Special Section.统计方法在预防科学中因果推断的进展:特刊介绍。
Prev Sci. 2019 Apr;20(3):390-393. doi: 10.1007/s11121-019-0978-x.
关于抽象强化物决策背后的脑网络反应。
Neuroimage. 2014 Dec;103:48-54. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.09.019. Epub 2014 Sep 16.
4
Pairwise measures of causal direction in the epidemiology of sleep problems and depression.睡眠问题与抑郁的流行病学中的因果方向的成对度量。
PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e50841. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0050841. Epub 2012 Nov 30.
5
Cohort profile: the cardiovascular risk in Young Finns Study.队列简介:年轻芬兰人研究中的心血管风险
Int J Epidemiol. 2008 Dec;37(6):1220-6. doi: 10.1093/ije/dym225. Epub 2008 Feb 8.
6
Estimating mutual information.估计互信息。
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2004 Jun;69(6 Pt 2):066138. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.69.066138. Epub 2004 Jun 23.