• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

英国患者及公众对电子健康记录及其应用的看法:横断面调查

Patient and public views on electronic health records and their uses in the United kingdom: cross-sectional survey.

作者信息

Luchenski Serena A, Reed Julie E, Marston Cicely, Papoutsi Chrysanthi, Majeed Azeem, Bell Derek

机构信息

NIHR CLAHRC for Northwest London, Imperial College London, Chelsea & Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2013 Aug 23;15(8):e160. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2701.

DOI:10.2196/jmir.2701
PMID:23975239
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3758045/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The development and implementation of electronic health records (EHRs) remains an international challenge. Better understanding of patient and public attitudes and the factors that influence overall levels of support toward EHRs is needed to inform policy.

OBJECTIVE

To explore patient and public attitudes toward integrated EHRs used simultaneously for health care provision, planning and policy, and health research.

METHODS

Cross-sectional questionnaire survey administered to patients and members of the public who were recruited from a stratified cluster random sample of 8 outpatient clinics of a major teaching hospital and 8 general practices in London (United Kingdom).

RESULTS

5331 patients and members of the public responded to the survey, with 2857 providing complete data for the analysis presented here. There were moderately high levels of support for integrated EHRs used simultaneously for health care provision, planning and policy, and health research (1785/2857, 62.47%), while 27.93% (798/2857) of participants reported being undecided about whether or not they would support EHR use. There were higher levels of support for specific uses of EHRs. Most participants were in favor of EHRs for personal health care provision (2563/2857, 89.71%), with 66.75% (1907/2857) stating that they would prefer their complete, rather than limited, medical history to be included. Of those "undecided" about integrated EHRs, 87.2% (696/798) were nevertheless in favor of sharing their full (373/798, 46.7%) or limited (323/798, 40.5%) records for health provision purposes. There were similar high levels of support for use of EHRs in health services policy and planning (2274/2857, 79.59%) and research (2325/2857, 81.38%), although 59.75% (1707/2857) and 67.10% (1917/2857) of respondents respectively would prefer their personal identifiers to be removed. Multivariable analysis showed levels of overall support for EHRs decreasing with age. Respondents self-identifying as Black British were more likely to report being undecided or unsupportive of national EHRs. Frequent health services users were more likely to report being supportive than undecided.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite previous difficulties with National Health Service (NHS) technology projects, patients and the public generally support the development of integrated EHRs for health care provision, planning and policy, and health research. This support, however, varies between social groups and is not unqualified; relevant safeguards must be in place and patients should be guided in their decision-making process, including increased awareness about the benefits of EHRs for secondary uses.

摘要

背景

电子健康记录(EHRs)的开发与实施仍是一项国际挑战。为政策提供依据,需要更好地了解患者和公众的态度以及影响对EHRs总体支持水平的因素。

目的

探讨患者和公众对同时用于医疗保健提供、规划与政策以及健康研究的综合EHRs的态度。

方法

对从英国伦敦一家主要教学医院的8家门诊诊所和8家全科诊所的分层整群随机样本中招募的患者和公众成员进行横断面问卷调查。

结果

5331名患者和公众成员对调查做出了回应,其中2857人提供了完整数据用于此处的分析。对于同时用于医疗保健提供、规划与政策以及健康研究的综合EHRs,支持水平适中偏高(1785/2857,62.47%),而27.93%(798/2857)的参与者表示对是否支持使用EHRs尚未决定。对EHRs的特定用途支持水平更高。大多数参与者赞成使用EHRs进行个人医疗保健(2563/2857,89.71%),66.75%(1907/2857)的人表示他们希望纳入完整而非有限的病史。在那些对综合EHRs“尚未决定”的人中,87.2%(696/798)仍然赞成出于医疗保健目的分享其完整(373/798,46.7%)或有限(323/他798,40.5%)的记录。对在卫生服务政策和规划(2274/2857,79.59%)以及研究(2325/2857,81.38%)中使用EHRs也有类似较高的支持水平,尽管分别有59.75%(1707/2857)和67.10%(1917/2857)的受访者更希望去除他们的个人标识符。多变量分析显示,对EHRs的总体支持水平随年龄增长而下降。自我认定为英国黑人的受访者更有可能表示对国家EHRs尚未决定或不支持。频繁使用卫生服务的人更有可能表示支持而非尚未决定。

结论

尽管此前国民医疗服务体系(NHS)的技术项目存在困难,但患者和公众总体上支持开发用于医疗保健提供、规划与政策以及健康研究的综合EHRs。然而,这种支持在不同社会群体之间存在差异且并非毫无保留;必须有相关保障措施,并且在患者的决策过程中应给予指导,包括提高对EHRs二次使用益处的认识。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/967e/3758045/95de82b136df/jmir_v15i8e160_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/967e/3758045/95de82b136df/jmir_v15i8e160_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/967e/3758045/95de82b136df/jmir_v15i8e160_fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Patient and public views on electronic health records and their uses in the United kingdom: cross-sectional survey.英国患者及公众对电子健康记录及其应用的看法:横断面调查
J Med Internet Res. 2013 Aug 23;15(8):e160. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2701.
2
Patient and public attitudes towards informed consent models and levels of awareness of Electronic Health Records in the UK.英国患者及公众对知情同意模式和电子健康记录知晓程度的态度。
Int J Med Inform. 2015 Apr;84(4):237-47. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.01.008. Epub 2015 Jan 20.
3
Patient and public views about the security and privacy of Electronic Health Records (EHRs) in the UK: results from a mixed methods study.英国患者及公众对电子健康记录(EHRs)安全性和隐私性的看法:一项混合方法研究的结果
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2015 Oct 14;15:86. doi: 10.1186/s12911-015-0202-2.
4
Survey of patient and public perceptions of electronic health records for healthcare, policy and research: study protocol.患者和公众对电子健康记录在医疗保健、政策和研究中的看法调查:研究方案。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012 May 23;12:40. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-12-40.
5
Attitudes of Mental Health Service Users Toward Storage and Use of Electronic Health Records.心理健康服务使用者对电子健康记录存储和使用的态度。
Psychiatr Serv. 2022 Sep 1;73(9):1013-1018. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.202100477. Epub 2022 Mar 16.
6
Electronic health records and clinical decision support systems: impact on national ambulatory care quality.电子健康记录与临床决策支持系统:对国家门诊医疗质量的影响
Arch Intern Med. 2011 May 23;171(10):897-903. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.527. Epub 2011 Jan 24.
7
Definition, structure, content, use and impacts of electronic health records: a review of the research literature.电子健康记录的定义、结构、内容、用途及影响:研究文献综述
Int J Med Inform. 2008 May;77(5):291-304. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2007.09.001. Epub 2007 Oct 22.
8
Public and physician's expectations and ethical concerns about electronic health record: Benefits outweigh risks except for information security.公众和医生对电子健康记录的期望和伦理关注:除了信息安全外,好处大于风险。
Int J Med Inform. 2018 Feb;110:98-107. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.12.004. Epub 2017 Dec 12.
9
A comparison of physician pre-adoption and adoption views on electronic health records in Canadian medical practices.加拿大医疗实践中医生对电子健康记录的预采用和采用观点比较。
J Med Internet Res. 2011 Aug 12;13(3):e57. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1726.
10
Usability problems do not heal by themselves: National survey on physicians' experiences with EHRs in Finland.可用性问题不会自行解决:芬兰医生使用电子健康记录的全国性调查。
Int J Med Inform. 2017 Jan;97:266-281. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.10.010. Epub 2016 Oct 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Sharing health data for research purposes: results of a population survey in Germany.出于研究目的共享健康数据:德国一项人口调查的结果
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 May 14;25(1):699. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12706-9.
2
Understanding patient perception of digital value co-creation in electronic health record through clustering approach.通过聚类方法理解患者对电子健康记录中数字价值共创的认知。
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 1;15(1):7303. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-91287-3.
3
Perception towards electronic health records & uptake of digital health IDs among the urban residents in northern India: A mixed methods study.

本文引用的文献

1
The personal health record paradox: health care professionals' perspectives and the information ecology of personal health record systems in organizational and clinical settings.个人健康记录悖论:医疗保健专业人员的观点以及组织和临床环境中个人健康记录系统的信息生态
J Med Internet Res. 2013 Apr 4;15(4):e70. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2443.
2
Survey of patient and public perceptions of electronic health records for healthcare, policy and research: study protocol.患者和公众对电子健康记录在医疗保健、政策和研究中的看法调查:研究方案。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012 May 23;12:40. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-12-40.
3
Willingness to share personal health record data for care improvement and public health: a survey of experienced personal health record users.
印度北部城市居民对电子健康记录的认知及对数字健康 ID 的接受度:一项混合方法研究。
Indian J Med Res. 2024 Jul;160(1):51-60. doi: 10.25259/ijmr_664_23.
4
Patient and Public Willingness to Share Personal Health Data for Third-Party or Secondary Uses: Systematic Review.患者和公众对个人健康数据用于第三方或二次使用的意愿:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Mar 5;26:e50421. doi: 10.2196/50421.
5
A Call to Reconsider a Nationwide Electronic Health Record System: Correcting the Failures of the National Program for IT.呼吁重新考虑全国性电子健康记录系统:纠正国家信息技术计划的失败之处。
JMIR Med Inform. 2023 Dec 28;11:e53112. doi: 10.2196/53112.
6
Views on sharing mental health data for research purposes: qualitative analysis of interviews with people with mental illness.对于研究目的共享心理健康数据的看法:对精神病患者访谈的定性分析。
BMC Med Ethics. 2023 Nov 14;24(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s12910-023-00961-6.
7
Barriers and Facilitators to the Use of Clinical Decision Support Systems in Primary Care: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review.临床决策支持系统在初级保健中的使用障碍和促进因素:混合方法系统评价。
Ann Fam Med. 2023 Jan-Feb;21(1):57-69. doi: 10.1370/afm.2908.
8
Factors Affecting Willingness on Sharing of Electronic Health Records Data: A Survey on Chinese Residents.影响电子健康记录数据共享意愿的因素:一项针对中国居民的调查
J Oncol. 2022 Jul 11;2022:5280792. doi: 10.1155/2022/5280792. eCollection 2022.
9
Public opinion on sharing data from health services for clinical and research purposes without explicit consent: an anonymous online survey in the UK.关于未经明确同意就分享医疗服务数据用于临床和研究目的的公众意见:英国的一项匿名在线调查
BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 27;12(4):e057579. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057579.
10
Experience of clinical services shapes attitudes to mental health data sharing: findings from a UK-wide survey.临床服务经验塑造了对心理健康数据共享的态度:全英范围调查结果
BMC Public Health. 2022 Feb 19;22(1):357. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-12694-z.
愿意分享个人健康记录数据以改善医疗和公共卫生:一项针对有经验的个人健康记录用户的调查。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012 May 22;12:39. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-12-39.
4
Patient interest in sharing personal health record information: a web-based survey.患者对分享个人健康记录信息的兴趣:一项基于网络的调查。
Ann Intern Med. 2011 Dec 20;155(12):805-10. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-12-201112200-00002.
5
Implementation and adoption of nationwide electronic health records in secondary care in England: final qualitative results from prospective national evaluation in "early adopter" hospitals.英格兰二级保健中全国性电子健康记录的实施和采用:“早期采用者”医院前瞻性全国评估的最终定性结果。
BMJ. 2011 Oct 17;343:d6054. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d6054.
6
Comparison of user groups' perspectives of barriers and facilitators to implementing electronic health records: a systematic review.比较用户群体对实施电子健康记录的障碍和促进因素的观点:系统评价。
BMC Med. 2011 Apr 28;9:46. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-9-46.
7
Do we need a national electronic summary care record?我们是否需要全国性的电子汇总式护理记录?
Med J Aust. 2011 Jan 17;194(2):90-2. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2011.tb04176.x.
8
Public attitudes to the use in research of personal health information from general practitioners' records: a survey of the Irish general public.公众对使用全科医生记录中的个人健康信息进行研究的态度:对爱尔兰公众的调查。
J Med Ethics. 2011 Jan;37(1):50-5. doi: 10.1136/jme.2010.037903. Epub 2010 Nov 11.
9
Patients' attitudes toward electronic health information exchange: qualitative study.患者对电子健康信息交换的态度:定性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2009 Aug 6;11(3):e30. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1164.
10
Alternatives to project-specific consent for access to personal information for health research: insights from a public dialogue.健康研究获取个人信息的特定项目同意之外的其他方式:来自公众对话的见解。
BMC Med Ethics. 2008 Nov 19;9:18. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-9-18.