Wang Chaoyi, Shea Charles H
1 College of Physical Education, Jilin University, Changchun, China.
2 Department of Health and Kinesiology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2019 Apr;72(4):966-978. doi: 10.1177/1747021818781772. Epub 2018 Jun 25.
Two tasks (A and B) were designed which required participants to sequentially move through four target positions in a Lissajous display. Task A was designed so that participants could complete the task using either unimanual or bimanual control strategies. Task B was designed so that participants could complete the task using relatively simple or more complex bimanual control strategies. The purpose of this study was to determine which control strategy the participant utilises to complete the two tasks when Lissajous displays are provided and to determine the degree to which the size of the targets influences the control strategy chosen under these conditions. The movement amplitude between two adjacent targets and the target size resulted in an Index of Difficulty (ID) of 2 and 4 for each task. For both tasks, participants practised 15 trials (30 s per trial) for each ID and then was administered a test trial. The results for both Tasks A and B indicated that the ID2 condition resulted in a circular path, whereas the ID4 condition resulted in a straight-line path on the Lissajous plot. This suggests that at the low ID condition participants produced a continuous 1:1 with 90° phase offset bimanual coordination pattern. At the high ID condition, the participants consistently chose to switch to a more stable unimanual left and right movements in Task A and to transition between in-phase and anti-phase bimanual coordination patterns in Task B. In addition, both limbs' movements were more harmonic in the low ID condition than in the high ID condition.
设计了两项任务(任务A和任务B),要求参与者在李萨如图形显示器中依次移动通过四个目标位置。任务A的设计使得参与者可以使用单手或双手控制策略来完成任务。任务B的设计使得参与者可以使用相对简单或更复杂的双手控制策略来完成任务。本研究的目的是确定当提供李萨如图形显示器时参与者使用哪种控制策略来完成这两项任务,并确定目标大小在多大程度上影响在这些条件下选择的控制策略。两项任务中,两个相邻目标之间的移动幅度和目标大小导致难度指数(ID)分别为2和4。对于这两项任务,参与者针对每个ID进行了15次试验(每次试验30秒),然后进行一次测试试验。任务A和任务B的结果均表明,ID2条件下在李萨如图上产生圆形路径,而ID4条件下产生直线路径。这表明在低ID条件下,参与者产生了连续的1:1且有90°相位偏移的双手协调模式。在高ID条件下,参与者在任务A中始终选择切换到更稳定的单手左右移动,在任务B中则在同相和反相双手协调模式之间转换。此外,在低ID条件下,双肢的运动比在高ID条件下更具谐波性。