Allison M C, Sercombe J, Pounder R E
Academic Department of Medicine, Royal Free Hospital School of Medicine, London, UK.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1988 Aug;2(4):347-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.1988.tb00707.x.
Fourteen patients with chronic diarrhoea, but no evidence of active organic disease, completed a double-blind crossover comparison of the anti-diarrhoeal effects of loperamide, placebo and the clonidine analogue, lidamidine. Failure of diarrhoea control led to early withdrawals from seven placebo- and six lidamidine-treatment periods, but there was only one early withdrawal during treatment with loperamide. Loperamide was found to be superior to lidamidine or placebo for the control of stool consistency in patients with chronic diarrhoea.
14名患有慢性腹泻但无活动性器质性疾病证据的患者,完成了洛哌丁胺、安慰剂和可乐定类似物利达脒止泻效果的双盲交叉比较。腹泻控制不佳导致7个安慰剂治疗期和6个利达脒治疗期的患者提前退出,但洛哌丁胺治疗期间只有1例提前退出。结果发现,在控制慢性腹泻患者的大便稠度方面,洛哌丁胺优于利达脒或安慰剂。