• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性非痢疾性腹泻的一线治疗:氧化洛哌丁胺、洛哌丁胺与安慰剂的临床比较。英国扬森全科医生研究小组。

First-line treatment in acute non-dysenteric diarrhoea: clinical comparison of loperamide oxide, loperamide and placebo. UK Janssen Research Group of General Practitioners.

作者信息

Hughes I W

出版信息

Br J Clin Pract. 1995 Jul-Aug;49(4):181-5.

PMID:7547157
Abstract

The use of antimicrobial agents for the treatment of acute diarrhoea has become more common with the introduction of quinolone compounds, which are active against most types of bacterial pathogens. Despite the fact that such drugs have been used for empirical therapy or even for prophylaxis, current opinion would restrict their use to specific groups of patients who are likely to show particular benefit from them. Non-specific therapy seems a more appropriate initial treatment for cases of acute, non-dysenteric diarrhoea. Clinical trial data are presented here comparing the effects of loperamide oxide 1 and 2 mg to those of placebo and loperamide 2 mg in this condition. All the drug preparations were significantly superior to placebo, in particular reducing the time to complete relief of symptoms to about 24 hours, as opposed to 45 hours on placebo treatment. Of these preparations, loperamide oxide 1 mg is to be preferred, as it produces fewer constipation-like episodes after treatment. The introduction of loperamide oxide 1 mg represents a useful advance in the non-specific treatment of acute, non-dysenteric diarrhoea.

摘要

随着对大多数类型细菌病原体有效的喹诺酮类化合物的引入,使用抗菌药物治疗急性腹泻变得更为普遍。尽管这类药物已被用于经验性治疗甚至预防,但目前的观点倾向于将其使用限制在可能从这些药物中获得特别益处的特定患者群体。对于急性非痢疾性腹泻病例,非特异性治疗似乎是更合适的初始治疗方法。本文给出了临床试验数据,比较了1毫克和2毫克氧化洛哌丁胺与安慰剂及2毫克洛哌丁胺在这种情况下的效果。所有药物制剂均显著优于安慰剂,特别是将症状完全缓解的时间缩短至约24小时,而安慰剂治疗则为45小时。在这些制剂中,1毫克氧化洛哌丁胺更值得选用,因为治疗后它引起的便秘样发作较少。1毫克氧化洛哌丁胺的引入代表了急性非痢疾性腹泻非特异性治疗方面的一项有益进展。

相似文献

1
First-line treatment in acute non-dysenteric diarrhoea: clinical comparison of loperamide oxide, loperamide and placebo. UK Janssen Research Group of General Practitioners.急性非痢疾性腹泻的一线治疗:氧化洛哌丁胺、洛哌丁胺与安慰剂的临床比较。英国扬森全科医生研究小组。
Br J Clin Pract. 1995 Jul-Aug;49(4):181-5.
2
Loperamide oxide in the treatment of acute diarrhea in adults.
Clin Ther. 1994 Nov-Dec;16(6):972-80.
3
A multicenter double-blind controlled trial comparing lidamidine HCl and loperamide in the symptomatic treatment of acute diarrhoea.一项比较盐酸利达脒和洛哌丁胺对症治疗急性腹泻的多中心双盲对照试验。
Arzneimittelforschung. 1986 Dec;36(12):1843-5.
4
Multicenter, double-blind, randomized comparison of wood creosote, the principal active ingredient of Seirogan, an herbal antidiarrheal medication, and loperamide in adults with acute nonspecific diarrhea.对成人急性非特异性腹泻患者,进行木馏油(一种草药止泻药西罗甘的主要活性成分)与洛哌丁胺的多中心、双盲、随机对照研究。
Clin Ther. 2004 Oct;26(10):1644-51. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2004.10.001.
5
Treatment of travellers' diarrhoea: zaldaride compared with loperamide and placebo.旅行者腹泻的治疗:扎尔达里德与洛哌丁胺及安慰剂的比较
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1995 Sep;7(9):871-5.
6
[Double-blind evaluation of the effectiveness of lidamidine hydrochloride (WHR-1142A) vs loperamide vs. placebo in the treatment of acute diarrhea].[盐酸利达脒(WHR-1142A)、洛哌丁胺与安慰剂治疗急性腹泻有效性的双盲评估]
Salud Publica Mex. 1981 Sep-Oct;23(5):483-91.
7
Loperamide plus azithromycin more effectively treats travelers' diarrhea in Mexico than azithromycin alone.在墨西哥,洛哌丁胺加阿奇霉素比单独使用阿奇霉素更有效地治疗旅行者腹泻。
J Travel Med. 2007 Sep-Oct;14(5):312-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8305.2007.00144.x.
8
[Multicenter double-blind clinical trial comparing sucralfate vs placebo in the prevention of diarrhea secondary to pelvic irradiation].[多中心双盲临床试验:比较硫糖铝与安慰剂预防盆腔放疗继发腹泻的效果]
Med Clin (Barc). 1999 Nov 27;113(18):681-4.
9
Loperamide oxide for the treatment of chronic diarrhoea in Crohn's disease.氧化洛哌丁胺用于治疗克罗恩病的慢性腹泻。
J Int Med Res. 1995 Sep-Oct;23(5):335-41. doi: 10.1177/030006059502300503.
10
Loperamide oxide in acute diarrhoea: a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. The Dutch Diarrhoea Trialists Group.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1995 Aug;9(4):441-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.1995.tb00403.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Summary of the Committee to Advise on Tropical Medicine and Travel (CATMAT) Statement on Travellers' Diarrhea.热带医学与旅行咨询委员会(CATMAT)关于旅行者腹泻声明的摘要。
Can Commun Dis Rep. 2015 Nov 5;41(11):272-284. doi: 10.14745/ccdr.v41i11a03.
2
Efficacy of diosmectite (smecta) in the treatment of acute watery diarrhoea in adults: a multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group study.蒙脱石(思密达)治疗成人急性水样腹泻的疗效:一项多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、平行分组研究。
Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2011;2011:783196. doi: 10.1155/2011/783196. Epub 2011 Jun 30.
3
Diarrhoea in adults (acute).
成人急性腹泻
BMJ Clin Evid. 2011 Feb 15;2011:0901.
4
Diarrhoea in adults (acute).成人急性腹泻
BMJ Clin Evid. 2008 Mar 4;2008:0901.
5
Racecadotril versus loperamide: antidiarrheal research revisited.消旋卡多曲与洛哌丁胺:腹泻治疗研究再探讨
Dig Dis Sci. 2003 Feb;48(2):239-50. doi: 10.1023/a:1021989606317.