Hughes I W
Br J Clin Pract. 1995 Jul-Aug;49(4):181-5.
The use of antimicrobial agents for the treatment of acute diarrhoea has become more common with the introduction of quinolone compounds, which are active against most types of bacterial pathogens. Despite the fact that such drugs have been used for empirical therapy or even for prophylaxis, current opinion would restrict their use to specific groups of patients who are likely to show particular benefit from them. Non-specific therapy seems a more appropriate initial treatment for cases of acute, non-dysenteric diarrhoea. Clinical trial data are presented here comparing the effects of loperamide oxide 1 and 2 mg to those of placebo and loperamide 2 mg in this condition. All the drug preparations were significantly superior to placebo, in particular reducing the time to complete relief of symptoms to about 24 hours, as opposed to 45 hours on placebo treatment. Of these preparations, loperamide oxide 1 mg is to be preferred, as it produces fewer constipation-like episodes after treatment. The introduction of loperamide oxide 1 mg represents a useful advance in the non-specific treatment of acute, non-dysenteric diarrhoea.
随着对大多数类型细菌病原体有效的喹诺酮类化合物的引入,使用抗菌药物治疗急性腹泻变得更为普遍。尽管这类药物已被用于经验性治疗甚至预防,但目前的观点倾向于将其使用限制在可能从这些药物中获得特别益处的特定患者群体。对于急性非痢疾性腹泻病例,非特异性治疗似乎是更合适的初始治疗方法。本文给出了临床试验数据,比较了1毫克和2毫克氧化洛哌丁胺与安慰剂及2毫克洛哌丁胺在这种情况下的效果。所有药物制剂均显著优于安慰剂,特别是将症状完全缓解的时间缩短至约24小时,而安慰剂治疗则为45小时。在这些制剂中,1毫克氧化洛哌丁胺更值得选用,因为治疗后它引起的便秘样发作较少。1毫克氧化洛哌丁胺的引入代表了急性非痢疾性腹泻非特异性治疗方面的一项有益进展。