Suppr超能文献

使用计算机辅助检测系统对致密型乳腺组织的女性进行乳腺癌筛查的自动乳腺超声的解读时间。

Interpretation Time Using a Concurrent-Read Computer-Aided Detection System for Automated Breast Ultrasound in Breast Cancer Screening of Women With Dense Breast Tissue.

机构信息

1 Department of Radiology, The University of Chicago, 5841 S Maryland Ave, MC2026, Chicago, IL 60637.

2 Department of Radiology, University of Kansas Health System, Westwood, KS.

出版信息

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018 Aug;211(2):452-461. doi: 10.2214/AJR.18.19516. Epub 2018 May 24.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to compare diagnostic accuracy and interpretation time of screening automated breast ultrasound (ABUS) for women with dense breast tissue without and with use of a recently U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved computer-aided detection (CAD) system for concurrent read.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In a retrospective observer performance study, 18 radiologists interpreted a cancer-enriched set (i.e., cancer prevalence higher than in the original screening cohort) of 185 screening ABUS studies (52 with and 133 without breast cancer). These studies were from a large cohort of ABUS-screened patients interpreted as BI-RADS density C or D. Each reader interpreted each case twice in a counterbalanced study, once without the CAD system and once with it, separated by 4 weeks. For each case, each reader identified abnormal findings and reported BI-RADS assessment category and level of suspicion for breast cancer. Interpretation time was recorded. Level of suspicion data were compared to evaluate diagnostic accuracy by means of the Dorfman-Berbaum-Metz method of jackknife with ANOVA ROC analysis. Interpretation times were compared by ANOVA.

RESULTS

The ROC AUC was 0.848 with the CAD system, compared with 0.828 without it, for a difference of 0.020 (95% CI, -0.011 to 0.051) and was statistically noninferior to the AUC without the CAD system with respect to a margin of -0.05 (p = 0.000086). The mean interpretation time was 3 minutes 33 seconds per case without the CAD system and 2 minutes 24 seconds with it, for a difference of 1 minute 9 seconds saved (95% CI, 44-93 seconds; p = 0.000014), or a reduction in interpretation time to 67% of the time without the CAD system.

CONCLUSION

Use of the concurrent-read CAD system for interpretation of screening ABUS studies of women with dense breast tissue who do not have symptoms is expected to make interpretation significantly faster and produce noninferior diagnostic accuracy compared with interpretation without the CAD system.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较在不使用和使用最近获得美国食品和药物管理局批准的计算机辅助检测(CAD)系统进行同期读取的情况下,对乳腺组织致密的女性进行筛查自动乳腺超声(ABUS)的诊断准确性和解读时间。

材料和方法

在一项回顾性观察者性能研究中,18 名放射科医生解读了一个富含癌症的筛查 ABUS 研究集(即癌症患病率高于原始筛查队列),共 185 项研究(52 项有乳腺癌,133 项无乳腺癌)。这些研究来自一个大型 ABUS 筛查患者队列,这些患者的 BI-RADS 密度为 C 或 D。每位读者以平衡方式两次解读每个病例,一次不使用 CAD 系统,一次使用 CAD 系统,间隔 4 周。对于每个病例,每位读者都识别了异常发现,并报告了 BI-RADS 评估类别和乳腺癌的可疑程度。记录了解读时间。通过 Dorfman-Berbaum-Metz 法的刀切法与 ANOVA ROC 分析比较可疑程度数据,以评估诊断准确性。通过 ANOVA 比较解释时间。

结果

使用 CAD 系统的 ROC AUC 为 0.848,而不使用 CAD 系统的 AUC 为 0.828,差异为 0.020(95%CI,-0.011 至 0.051),并且在 CAD 系统的 AUC 方面统计学上不低于 CAD 系统的 AUC -0.05(p = 0.000086)。不使用 CAD 系统时,每个病例的平均解读时间为 3 分 33 秒,使用 CAD 系统时为 2 分 24 秒,相差 1 分 9 秒(95%CI,44-93 秒;p = 0.000014),即解读时间减少到不使用 CAD 系统时的 67%。

结论

在不伴有症状的乳腺组织致密的女性中,使用同期读取的 CAD 系统进行筛查 ABUS 研究的解读,预计将使解读速度显著加快,并与不使用 CAD 系统相比,产生非劣效的诊断准确性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验