1 Intrinsic Imaging, LLC, 8401 Datapoint, Ste 600, San Antonio, TX 78229.
2 Biostatistics Consulting, LLC, Kensington, MD.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018 Mar;210(3):685-694. doi: 10.2214/AJR.17.18185. Epub 2017 Oct 24.
Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) is more accurate than full-field digital mammography alone but requires a longer reading time. A radiologist reader study evaluated the use of concurrent computer-aided detection (CAD) to shorten the reading time while maintaining interpretation performance.
A CAD system was developed to detect suspicious soft-tissue densities in DBT planes. Abnormalities are extracted from the plane in which they are detected and blended into the corresponding synthetic image. The study used an enriched sample of 240 DBT cases with 68 malignancies in 61 patients. Twenty radiologists retrospectively reviewed all 240 cases in a multireader multicase crossover design to compare reading time and performance with and without CAD. The performance of CAD alone was also evaluated.
Reading time improved by 29.2% with CAD (95% CI, 21.1-36.5%; p < 0.01). Reader performance, measured by ROC AUC, was noninferior with CAD (p < 0.01). The mean AUC increased from 0.841 without to 0.850 with CAD (95% CI, -0.012 to 0.030). Mean sensitivity increased from 0.847 without to 0.871 with CAD (difference 95% CI, -0.005 to 0.055), showing a 0.033 increase in sensitivity for cases with soft-tissue densities (95% CI, -0.002 to 0.068). Mean specificity decreased from 0.527 without to 0.509 with CAD (difference 95% CI, -0.041 to 0.005), and mean recall rate for noncancers slightly increased from 0.474 without to 0.492 with CAD (difference 95% CI, -0.006 to 0.041).
Concurrent use of CAD with DBT resulted in 29.2% faster reading time, while maintaining reader interpretation performance.
数字乳腺断层合成技术(DBT)比全数字化乳腺摄影更准确,但阅读时间更长。一项放射科医师阅读者研究评估了同时使用计算机辅助检测(CAD)来缩短阅读时间,同时保持解释性能。
开发了一种 CAD 系统,用于检测 DBT 平面中的可疑软组织密度。从检测到异常的平面中提取异常,并将其混合到相应的合成图像中。该研究使用了一个富含 240 例 DBT 病例的样本,其中 61 名患者中有 68 例恶性肿瘤。20 名放射科医师以多读者多病例交叉设计回顾性地审查了所有 240 例病例,以比较有无 CAD 的阅读时间和性能。还评估了 CAD 单独使用的性能。
使用 CAD 可将阅读时间缩短 29.2%(95%CI,21.1-36.5%;p<0.01)。使用 CAD 时,ROC AUC 测量的读者性能无差异(p<0.01)。AUC 均值从无 CAD 时的 0.841 增加到有 CAD 时的 0.850(95%CI,-0.012 至 0.030)。平均敏感性从无 CAD 时的 0.847 增加到有 CAD 时的 0.871(差异 95%CI,-0.005 至 0.055),软组织密度病例的敏感性增加了 0.033(95%CI,-0.002 至 0.068)。使用 CAD 时,特异性均值从无 CAD 时的 0.527 降低到 0.509(差异 95%CI,-0.041 至 0.005),非癌症的平均召回率略有增加,从无 CAD 时的 0.474 增加到有 CAD 时的 0.492(差异 95%CI,-0.006 至 0.041)。
在 DBT 中同时使用 CAD 可使阅读时间缩短 29.2%,同时保持阅读者的解释性能。