Wang Elizabeth Y, Meyer Craig, Graham Glenn D, Whooley Mary A
1 Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
2 San Francisco VA Health Care System, San Francisco, CA, USA.
J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 2018 May;31(3):129-135. doi: 10.1177/0891988718778791. Epub 2018 May 24.
Uncertainty surrounds which screening test to use in older patients with poststroke depression, in whom symptoms of depression are more complex and often occur in conjunction with other comorbidities. We evaluated screening tests for depression among a cohort of older ambulatory individuals with comorbid ischemic heart disease and prior stroke.
We administered 4 depression screening instruments to 148 participants with ischemic heart disease and self-reported stroke from The Heart and Soul Study. Instruments included the 10-item Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D), 9-item and 2-item versions of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9 and PHQ-2), and the Whooley questions, a 2-item yes/no questionnaire. We administered the computerized version of the National Institute of Mental Health Diagnostic Interview Schedule as a gold standard.
Of the 148 participants, 35 (24%) had major depression. The Whooley questions demonstrated the highest sensitivity for detection (89%), followed by the CES-D (80%), PHQ-2 with cut point ≥2 (79%), PHQ-9 (51%), and PHQ-2 with cut point ≥3 (32%). The Whooley questions had a specificity of 0.66, a positive likelihood ratio of 2.61, and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.82. We observed no significant difference in the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve across the 4 instruments.
In a cohort of ambulatory older adults with coronary heart disease and prior stroke, depression occurred in a fourth of the participants. The simple Whooley questions screening instrument can efficiently detect depression with a high sensitivity in this population, one representative of older patients commonly encountered within a primary care setting.
对于患有中风后抑郁症的老年患者应采用哪种筛查测试存在不确定性,这类患者的抑郁症状更为复杂,且常与其他合并症同时出现。我们评估了一组患有缺血性心脏病且有中风史的老年非卧床个体的抑郁症筛查测试。
我们对来自“心灵研究”的148名患有缺血性心脏病且自我报告有中风史的参与者进行了4种抑郁症筛查工具的测试。这些工具包括10项流行病学研究中心抑郁量表(CES-D)、患者健康问卷的9项和2项版本(PHQ-9和PHQ-2)以及Whooley问题(一个2项的是/否问卷)。我们将美国国立精神卫生研究所诊断访谈表的计算机化版本作为金标准。
在148名参与者中,35人(24%)患有重度抑郁症。Whooley问题在检测方面表现出最高的敏感性(89%),其次是CES-D(80%)、切点≥2的PHQ-2(79%)、PHQ-9(51%)以及切点≥3的PHQ-2(32%)。Whooley问题的特异性为0.66,阳性似然比为2.61,阴性似然比为0.82。我们观察到这4种工具在受试者工作特征曲线下的面积没有显著差异。
在一组患有冠心病且有中风史的非卧床老年人中,四分之一的参与者患有抑郁症。简单的Whooley问题筛查工具能够在该人群中以高敏感性有效检测出抑郁症,该人群是初级保健环境中常见老年患者的代表。