• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

食管癌微创食管切除术对健康相关生活质量的影响变化:一项荟萃分析。

The change of health-related quality of life after minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Thoracic Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, No. 277 West Yanta Road, Xi'an, 710061, China.

Hospital 521 of China's Ordnance Industry Group, Xi'an, 710065, China.

出版信息

World J Surg Oncol. 2018 May 24;16(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s12957-018-1330-9.

DOI:10.1186/s12957-018-1330-9
PMID:29793487
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5968615/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Short- and long-term health-related quality of life (HRQL) was severely affected after surgery. This study aimed to assess the direction and duration of HRQL from 3- to 24-month follow-ups after minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for esophageal cancer.

METHODS

A systematic literature search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane database was performed for all potentially relevant studies published until February 2017. Studies were included if they addressed the question of HRQL with OERTC-QLQ-C30 and OES18. Primary outcomes were HRQL change at 3-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes were HRQL change from 3-, 6- (short-term) to 12- (mid-term), and/or 24-month (long-term) follow-ups.

RESULTS

Six articles were included to estimate the change in 24 HRQL outcomes after MIE. Most of the patients' HRQL outcomes deteriorated at short-term follow-up and some lasted to mid- or long-term after MIE. Patients' physical function and global QOL deteriorated from short- to long-term follow-ups, and emotional function had no change. The directions of dyspnea, pain, fatigue, insomnia, constipation, diarrhea, cough, and speech problems were increased. The deterioration in global function lasted 6 months, the increase in constipation and speech problems lasted 12 months, and insomnia increased more than 12 months after MIE.

CONCLUSIONS

The emotional function had no change after MIE. The global QOL become worse during early postoperative period; the symptoms of constipation, speech problems, and insomnia increased for a long time after MIE.

摘要

背景

微创手术(MIE)治疗食管癌后,患者的短期和长期健康相关生活质量(HRQL)均受到严重影响。本研究旨在评估 MIE 后 3 至 24 个月随访期间 HRQL 的变化方向和持续时间。

方法

对 MEDLINE、EMBASE 和 Cochrane 数据库进行系统文献检索,以查找直至 2017 年 2 月发表的所有潜在相关研究。如果研究使用 OERTC-QLQ-C30 和 OES18 来解决 HRQL 问题,则将其纳入研究。主要结局为 3 个月随访时的 HRQL 变化。次要结局为 3、6(短期)至 12(中期)和/或 24 个月(长期)随访时的 HRQL 变化。

结果

纳入 6 项研究来评估 MIE 后 24 项 HRQL 结局的变化。大多数患者的 HRQL 结局在短期随访时恶化,有些在 MIE 后持续到中期或长期。患者的身体功能和整体生活质量从短期随访到长期随访逐渐恶化,而情绪功能没有变化。呼吸困难、疼痛、疲劳、失眠、便秘、腹泻、咳嗽和言语问题的方向均加重。整体功能的恶化持续 6 个月,便秘和言语问题的增加持续 12 个月,失眠在 MIE 后增加超过 12 个月。

结论

MIE 后情绪功能没有变化。全球生活质量在术后早期恶化;便秘、言语问题和失眠的症状在 MIE 后很长一段时间内都在增加。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/746a/5968615/2a5f47898d99/12957_2018_1330_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/746a/5968615/2a5f47898d99/12957_2018_1330_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/746a/5968615/2a5f47898d99/12957_2018_1330_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The change of health-related quality of life after minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis.食管癌微创食管切除术对健康相关生活质量的影响变化:一项荟萃分析。
World J Surg Oncol. 2018 May 24;16(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s12957-018-1330-9.
2
Minimally invasive esophagectomy via Sweet approach in combination with cervical mediastinoscopy is a valuable approach for surgical treatment of esophageal cancer.经 Sweet 入路微创食管切除术联合颈纵隔镜检查是治疗食管癌的一种有价值的手术方法。
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2021 Jan 28;46(1):60-68. doi: 10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2021.190568.
3
Systematic review of health-related quality of life after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.食管癌切除术后健康相关生活质量的系统评价。
World J Gastroenterol. 2011 Nov 14;17(42):4660-74. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i42.4660.
4
Meta-analysis shows clinically relevant and long-lasting deterioration in health-related quality of life after esophageal cancer surgery.荟萃分析显示,食管癌手术后健康相关生活质量出现临床相关且持久的恶化。
Qual Life Res. 2014 May;23(4):1155-76. doi: 10.1007/s11136-013-0576-5. Epub 2013 Dec 3.
5
Meta-analysis shows clinically relevant and long-lasting deterioration in health-related quality of life after esophageal cancer surgery.荟萃分析显示,食管癌手术后健康相关生活质量出现临床相关且持久的恶化。
Qual Life Res. 2014 May;23(4):1097-115. doi: 10.1007/s11136-013-0545-z. Epub 2013 Oct 16.
6
Robot-assisted esophagectomy (RAE) versus conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: protocol for a multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial (RAMIE trial, robot-assisted minimally invasive Esophagectomy).机器人辅助食管切除术(RAE)与传统微创食管切除术(MIE)治疗可切除的食管鳞癌:一项多中心前瞻性随机对照试验的方案(RAMIE 试验,机器人辅助微创食管切除术)。
BMC Cancer. 2019 Jun 21;19(1):608. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-5799-6.
7
Comparisons between minimally invasive and open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer with cervical anastomosis: a retrospective study.食管癌颈部吻合术的微创与开放食管切除术比较:一项回顾性研究。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020 Jun 8;15(1):128. doi: 10.1186/s13019-020-01182-3.
8
Minimally Invasive Thoracoabdominal Esophagectomy Is Superior to Minimally Invasive Gastrectomy in Terms of Health-Related Quality of Life.微创胸腹联合食管切除术在健康相关生活质量方面优于微创胃切除术。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2021 Mar;31(3):306-313. doi: 10.1089/lap.2020.0509. Epub 2020 Sep 22.
9
Quality of Life and Late Complications After Minimally Invasive Compared to Open Esophagectomy: Results of a Randomized Trial.与开放食管切除术相比,微创食管切除术后的生活质量和晚期并发症:一项随机试验的结果。
World J Surg. 2015 Aug;39(8):1986-93. doi: 10.1007/s00268-015-3100-y.
10
Minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: an updated review.微创食管癌切除术:最新综述。
Surg Today. 2013 Mar;43(3):237-44. doi: 10.1007/s00595-012-0300-z. Epub 2012 Aug 28.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of ERAS-based nursing interventions on postoperative complication management and prognosis in early gastrointestinal tumor endoscopic resection: a prospective randomized controlled study.基于加速康复外科(ERAS)的护理干预对早期胃肠道肿瘤内镜切除术后并发症管理及预后的影响:一项前瞻性随机对照研究
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2025 Apr 21;410(1):135. doi: 10.1007/s00423-025-03652-5.
2
Cardiopulmonary exercise variables and their association with postoperative morbidity and mortality after major oesophagogastric cancer surgery-a multicentre observational study.心肺运动变量及其与主要食管胃癌手术后术后发病率和死亡率的关联——一项多中心观察性研究
BJA Open. 2024 Jun 7;10:100289. doi: 10.1016/j.bjao.2024.100289. eCollection 2024 Jun.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Minimally invasive oesophagectomy versus open esophagectomy for resectable esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis.微创食管切除术与开放食管切除术治疗可切除食管癌的Meta分析
World J Surg Oncol. 2016 Dec 8;14(1):304. doi: 10.1186/s12957-016-1062-7.
2
Long-term Health-related Quality of Life Following Esophagectomy: A Nonrandomized Comparison of Thoracoscopically Assisted and Open Surgery.胸腔镜辅助与开放性手术治疗食管癌:长期健康相关生活质量的非随机比较。
Ann Surg. 2017 Jun;265(6):1158-1165. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001899.
3
Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2016.
Health-related quality of life among patients with esophageal, gastric, and colorectal cancer at Kenyatta National Hospital.肯尼亚国家医院食管、胃和结直肠癌患者的健康相关生活质量。
Cancer Rep (Hoboken). 2024 Mar;7(3):e2038. doi: 10.1002/cnr2.2038.
4
Dietary habits and nutrition status in esophageal cancer patients after esophageal reconstruction.食管重建术后食管癌患者的饮食习惯和营养状况
J Thorac Dis. 2024 Feb 29;16(2):1118-1127. doi: 10.21037/jtd-23-1266. Epub 2024 Feb 20.
5
Health-related quality of life after esophagectomy in patients with esophageal cancer.食管癌患者食管切除术后的健康相关生活质量。
Esophagus. 2022 Jan;19(1):47-56. doi: 10.1007/s10388-021-00874-6. Epub 2021 Sep 1.
6
Functional syndromes and symptom-orientated aftercare after esophagectomy.食管切除术后的功能性综合征和症状导向的康复治疗。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2021 Nov;406(7):2249-2261. doi: 10.1007/s00423-021-02203-y. Epub 2021 May 25.
7
The AUGIS Survival Predictor: Prediction of Long-Term and Conditional Survival After Esophagectomy Using Random Survival Forests.AUGIS 生存预测器:使用随机生存森林预测食管癌手术后的长期和条件生存。
Ann Surg. 2023 Feb 1;277(2):267-274. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004794. Epub 2023 Jan 10.
8
Comparison of Up-Front Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy versus Open Esophagectomy on Quality of Life for Esophageal Squamous Cell Cancer. upfront 微创食管切除术与开放食管切除术治疗食管鳞癌的生活质量比较。
Curr Oncol. 2021 Jan 25;28(1):693-701. doi: 10.3390/curroncol28010068.
9
Severe reflux, sleep disturbances, and health-related quality of life after esophageal cancer surgery.食管癌手术后严重反流、睡眠障碍和健康相关生活质量。
J Cancer Surviv. 2021 Dec;15(6):818-824. doi: 10.1007/s11764-020-00974-9. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
10
Long-term health-related quality of life after McKeown and Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma.食管癌经麦克尤恩式和艾弗·刘易斯式食管切除术后与健康相关的长期生活质量
Dis Esophagus. 2020 Nov 18;33(11). doi: 10.1093/dote/doaa022.
癌症治疗和生存统计,2016 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2016 Jul;66(4):271-89. doi: 10.3322/caac.21349. Epub 2016 Jun 2.
4
Minimally Invasive Versus Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Population-Based Analysis.微创与开放食管癌切除术治疗食管癌:一项基于人群的分析。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2016 Aug;102(2):416-23. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.02.078. Epub 2016 May 4.
5
Translation, validation of the EORTC esophageal cancer quality-of-life questionnaire for Japanese with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: analysis in thoraco-laparoscopic esophagectomy versus open esophagectomy.欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织(EORTC)食管癌生活质量问卷针对日本食管鳞状细胞癌患者的翻译、验证:胸腔镜辅助腹腔镜食管癌切除术与开放食管癌切除术的分析
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2016 Jul;46(7):615-21. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyw040. Epub 2016 Apr 7.
6
Minimally Invasive Versus Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Comparison of Early Surgical Outcomes From The Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Database.微创与开放食管癌切除术治疗食管癌:来自胸外科医师协会国家数据库的早期手术结果比较
Ann Thorac Surg. 2016 Apr;101(4):1281-8; discussion 1288-9. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.09.095. Epub 2015 Dec 17.
7
Hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer: impact on postoperative inflammatory and nutritional status.杂交微创食管癌切除术治疗癌症:对术后炎症和营养状况的影响
Dis Esophagus. 2016 Nov;29(8):1064-1070. doi: 10.1111/dote.12418. Epub 2015 Sep 24.
8
Superiority of Minimally Invasive Oesophagectomy in Reducing In-Hospital Mortality of Patients with Resectable Oesophageal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.微创食管切除术在降低可切除食管癌患者院内死亡率方面的优越性:一项荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 21;10(7):e0132889. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132889. eCollection 2015.
9
Quality of Life and Late Complications After Minimally Invasive Compared to Open Esophagectomy: Results of a Randomized Trial.与开放食管切除术相比,微创食管切除术后的生活质量和晚期并发症:一项随机试验的结果。
World J Surg. 2015 Aug;39(8):1986-93. doi: 10.1007/s00268-015-3100-y.
10
Outcomes, quality of life, and survival after esophagectomy for squamous cell carcinoma: A propensity score-matched comparison of operative approaches.根治性食管切除术治疗食管鳞癌的疗效、生活质量和生存率:手术方式的倾向评分匹配比较。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015 Apr;149(4):1006-14; discussion 1014- 5.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.12.063. Epub 2015 Jan 9.