Durso Rachel, Craig Jenkins J, Martin Andrew, Stearmer Matthew
Dept. of Sociology, Washington College, Chestertown, MD 21620, United States.
Mershon Center for International Security Studies, 1501 Neil Ave, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43201, United States.
Soc Sci Res. 2018 Jul;73:207-220. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2018.03.014. Epub 2018 Mar 27.
A major challenge for social movement and political campaign studies is generating large, representative samples of political activists. This paper outlines a strategy of surveying those who participate in a common, baseline form of political action: signing petitions. Similar to protest surveys, signing a petition constitutes a more baseline low cost/low risk form of political activism. In 26 states in the U.S. petition lists are public record and, with modest effort, can be used to study a wide variety of issues, groups and campaigns. We outline the steps and costs involved in such a petition survey and how to improve response rate. To assess response bias, we compare demographic and political affiliation measures acquired from a marketing analytics company (Experian) for respondents and non-respondents to our survey of petition signers for two state-level initiative elections, finding only modest and interpretable response bias. The methods presented here have broader implications for survey research in general.
社会运动和政治竞选研究面临的一个主要挑战是生成大量具有代表性的政治活动家样本。本文概述了一种对参与一种常见的、基本形式的政治行动的人进行调查的策略:签署请愿书。与抗议调查类似,签署请愿书是一种成本更低、风险更小的基本形式的政治激进主义。在美国的26个州,请愿名单是公开记录,只需付出适度努力,就可用于研究各种各样的问题、团体和竞选活动。我们概述了这种请愿书调查所涉及的步骤和成本,以及如何提高回复率。为了评估回复偏差,我们比较了从一家营销分析公司(益百利)获取的针对我们对两个州级倡议选举的请愿书签署者调查的受访者和非受访者的人口统计和政治派别指标,发现只有适度的、可解释的回复偏差。这里介绍的方法总体上对调查研究具有更广泛的意义。