Hussman School of Journalism and Media, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Center for Information, Technology, and Public Life, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Science. 2020 Sep 4;369(6508):1197-1201. doi: 10.1126/science.abb2428.
Digital media are critical for contemporary activism-even low-effort "clicktivism" is politically consequential and contributes to offline participation. We argue that in the United States and throughout the industrialized West, left- and right-wing activists use digital and legacy media differently to achieve political goals. Although left-wing actors operate primarily through "hashtag activism" and offline protest, right-wing activists manipulate legacy media, migrate to alternative platforms, and work strategically with partisan media to spread their messages. Although scholarship suggests that the right has embraced strategic disinformation and conspiracy theories more than the left, more research is needed to reveal the magnitude and character of left-wing disinformation. Such ideological asymmetries between left- and right-wing activism hold critical implications for democratic practice, social media governance, and the interdisciplinary study of digital politics.
数字媒体对当代激进主义至关重要——即使是低投入的“点击式激进主义”也具有政治意义,并有助于线下参与。我们认为,在美国和整个西方工业化国家,左翼和右翼激进主义者使用数字媒体和传统媒体的方式不同,以实现政治目标。虽然左翼行为者主要通过“标签激进主义”和线下抗议活动来运作,但右翼行为者会操纵传统媒体、迁移到替代平台,并与党派媒体进行策略性合作以传播他们的信息。尽管有研究表明,右翼比左翼更接受战略性的虚假信息和阴谋论,但仍需要更多的研究来揭示左翼虚假信息的规模和性质。这种左翼和右翼激进主义之间的意识形态不对称对民主实践、社交媒体治理和数字政治的跨学科研究具有关键影响。