• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一款用于识别未诊断糖尿病和糖尿病前期个体并促进行为改变的移动应用程序:为期2年的前瞻性研究。

A Mobile App for Identifying Individuals With Undiagnosed Diabetes and Prediabetes and for Promoting Behavior Change: 2-Year Prospective Study.

作者信息

Leung Angela Ym, Xu Xin Yi, Chau Pui Hing, Yu Yee Tak Esther, Cheung Mike Kt, Wong Carlos Kh, Fong Daniel Yt, Wong Janet Yh, Lam Cindy Lk

机构信息

Centre for Gerontological Nursing, School of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR, China (Hong Kong).

School of Nursing, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China (Hong Kong).

出版信息

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018 May 24;6(5):e10662. doi: 10.2196/10662.

DOI:10.2196/10662
PMID:29793901
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5992453/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To decrease the burden of diabetes in society, early screening of undiagnosed diabetes and prediabetes is needed. Integrating a diabetes risk score into a mobile app would provide a useful platform to enable people to self-assess their risk of diabetes with ease.

OBJECTIVE

The objectives of this study were to (1) assess the profile of Diabetes Risk Score mobile app users, (2) determine the optimal cutoff value of the Finnish Diabetes Risk Score to identify undiagnosed diabetes and prediabetes in the Chinese population, (3) estimate users' chance of developing diabetes within 2 years of using the app, and (4) investigate high-risk app users' lifestyle behavior changes after ascertaining their risk level from the app.

METHODS

We conducted this 2-phase study among adults via mobile app and online survey from August 2014 to December 2016. Phase 1 adopted a cross-sectional design, with a descriptive analysis of the app users' profile. We used a Cohen kappa score to show the agreement between the risk level (as shown in the app) and glycated hemoglobin test results. We used sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve to determine the optimal cutoff value of the diabetes risk score in this population. Phase 2 was a prospective cohort study. We used a logistic regression model to estimate the chance of developing diabetes after using the app. Paired t tests compared high-risk app users' lifestyle changes.

RESULTS

A total of 13,289 people used the app in phase 1a. After data cleaning, we considered 4549 of these as valid data. Most users were male, and 1811 (39.81%) had tertiary education or above. Among them, 188 (10.4%) users agreed to attend the health assessment in phase 1b. We recommend the optimal value of the diabetes risk score for identifying persons with undiagnosed diabetes and prediabetes to be 9, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.67 (95% CI 0.60-0.74), sensitivity of 0.70 (95% CI 0.58-0.80), and specificity of 0.57 (95% CI 0.47-0.66). At the 2-year follow-up, people in the high-risk group had a higher chance of developing diabetes (odds ratio 4.59, P=.048) than the low-risk group. The high-risk app users improved their daily intake of vegetables (baseline: mean 0.76, SD 0.43; follow-up: mean 0.93, SD 0.26; t=-3.77, P<.001) and daily exercise (baseline: mean 0.40, SD 0.49; follow-up: mean 0.54, SD 0.50; t=-2.08, P=.04).

CONCLUSIONS

The Diabetes Risk Score app has been shown to be a feasible and reliable tool to identify persons with undiagnosed diabetes and prediabetes and to predict diabetes incidence in 2 years. The app can also encourage high-risk people to modify dietary habits and reduce sedentary lifestyle.

摘要

背景

为减轻社会中糖尿病的负担,需要对未诊断的糖尿病和糖尿病前期进行早期筛查。将糖尿病风险评分整合到移动应用程序中,将提供一个有用的平台,使人们能够轻松地自我评估患糖尿病的风险。

目的

本研究的目的是:(1)评估糖尿病风险评分移动应用程序用户的概况;(2)确定芬兰糖尿病风险评分在中国人群中识别未诊断的糖尿病和糖尿病前期的最佳临界值;(3)估计用户在使用该应用程序2年内患糖尿病的几率;(4)在通过该应用程序确定其风险水平后,调查高风险应用程序用户的生活方式行为变化。

方法

我们在2014年8月至2016年12月期间,通过移动应用程序和在线调查对成年人进行了这项两阶段研究。第一阶段采用横断面设计,对应用程序用户的概况进行描述性分析。我们使用Cohen kappa评分来显示风险水平(如应用程序中所示)与糖化血红蛋白测试结果之间的一致性。我们使用敏感性、特异性和曲线下面积来确定该人群中糖尿病风险评分的最佳临界值。第二阶段是一项前瞻性队列研究。我们使用逻辑回归模型来估计使用该应用程序后患糖尿病的几率。配对t检验比较了高风险应用程序用户的生活方式变化。

结果

在第一阶段a中,共有13289人使用了该应用程序。经过数据清理后,我们将其中的4549人视为有效数据。大多数用户为男性,1811人(39.81%)拥有大专及以上学历。其中,188名(10.4%)用户同意参加第一阶段b中的健康评估。我们建议将用于识别未诊断的糖尿病和糖尿病前期患者的糖尿病风险评分的最佳值设定为9,其受试者工作特征曲线下面积为0.67(95%CI 0.60-0.74),敏感性为0.70(95%CI 0.58-0.80),特异性为0.57(95%CI 0.47-0.66)。在2年的随访中,高风险组的人患糖尿病的几率(优势比4.59,P=0.048)高于低风险组。高风险应用程序用户增加了蔬菜的每日摄入量(基线:平均值0.76,标准差0.43;随访:平均值0.93,标准差0.26;t=-3.77,P<0.001)和每日运动量(基线:平均值0.40,标准差0.49;随访:平均值0.54,标准差0.50;t=-2.08,P=0.04)。

结论

糖尿病风险评分应用程序已被证明是一种可行且可靠的工具,可用于识别未诊断的糖尿病和糖尿病前期患者,并预测2年内的糖尿病发病率。该应用程序还可以鼓励高风险人群改变饮食习惯,减少久坐的生活方式。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f578/5992453/bbadeacf2026/mhealth_v6i5e10662_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f578/5992453/bbadeacf2026/mhealth_v6i5e10662_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f578/5992453/bbadeacf2026/mhealth_v6i5e10662_fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
A Mobile App for Identifying Individuals With Undiagnosed Diabetes and Prediabetes and for Promoting Behavior Change: 2-Year Prospective Study.一款用于识别未诊断糖尿病和糖尿病前期个体并促进行为改变的移动应用程序:为期2年的前瞻性研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018 May 24;6(5):e10662. doi: 10.2196/10662.
2
Health Outcomes Following Engagement With a Digital Health Tool Among People With Prediabetes and Type 2 Diabetes: Prospective Evaluation Study.糖尿病前期和2型糖尿病患者使用数字健康工具后的健康结果:前瞻性评估研究
JMIR Diabetes. 2023 Dec 28;8:e47224. doi: 10.2196/47224.
3
Association Between Mobile Health App Engagement and Weight Loss and Glycemic Control in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes and Prediabetes (D'LITE Study): Prospective Cohort Study.2型糖尿病和糖尿病前期成人的移动健康应用参与度与体重减轻及血糖控制之间的关联(D'LITE研究):前瞻性队列研究
JMIR Diabetes. 2022 Sep 30;7(3):e35039. doi: 10.2196/35039.
4
Evaluation of Finnish Diabetes Risk Score in screening undiagnosed diabetes and prediabetes among U.S. adults by gender and race: NHANES 1999-2010.按性别和种族评估芬兰糖尿病风险评分在美国成年人中筛查未诊断糖尿病和糖尿病前期的情况:1999 - 2010年美国国家健康与营养检查调查
PLoS One. 2014 May 22;9(5):e97865. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0097865. eCollection 2014.
5
Exploring the Constituent Elements of a Successful Mobile Health Intervention for Prediabetic Patients in King Saud University Medical City Hospitals in Saudi Arabia: Cross-sectional Study.探索沙特阿拉伯国王沙特大学医学城医院针对糖尿病前期患者的成功移动健康干预的构成要素:横断面研究
JMIR Form Res. 2021 Jul 20;5(7):e22968. doi: 10.2196/22968.
6
Usage Patterns of GlucoNote, a Self-Management Smartphone App, Based on ResearchKit for Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Prediabetes.基于 ResearchKit 的 2 型糖尿病和糖尿病前期患者自我管理智能手机应用程序 GlucoNote 的使用模式。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Apr 24;7(4):e13204. doi: 10.2196/13204.
7
A Mobile Health Intervention for Self-Management and Lifestyle Change for Persons With Type 2 Diabetes, Part 2: One-Year Results From the Norwegian Randomized Controlled Trial RENEWING HEALTH.移动健康干预对 2 型糖尿病患者的自我管理和生活方式改变,第 2 部分:挪威随机对照试验 RENEWING HEALTH 的一年结果。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2014 Dec 11;2(4):e57. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.3882.
8
Identifying App-Based Meditation Habits and the Associated Mental Health Benefits: Longitudinal Observational Study.基于应用程序的冥想习惯与相关心理健康益处的识别:纵向观察性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Nov 4;23(11):e27282. doi: 10.2196/27282.
9
Uptake of a Consumer-Focused mHealth Application for the Assessment and Prevention of Heart Disease: The <30 Days Study.消费者导向的移动医疗应用程序在心脏病评估和预防中的应用:<30 天研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2016 Mar 24;4(1):e32. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.4730.
10
Does a Mobile Phone Depression-Screening App Motivate Mobile Phone Users With High Depressive Symptoms to Seek a Health Care Professional's Help?一款手机抑郁症筛查应用程序能否促使有高度抑郁症状的手机用户寻求医疗保健专业人员的帮助?
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Jun 27;18(6):e156. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5726.

引用本文的文献

1
Remotely Conducted App-Based Intervention for Cardiovascular Disease and Diabetes Risk Awareness and Prevention: Single-Group Feasibility Trial.基于应用程序的心血管疾病和糖尿病风险认知与预防远程干预:单组可行性试验。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2022 Jul 1;9(3):e38469. doi: 10.2196/38469.
2
Level of Digitalization in Germany: Results of the Diabetes Digitalization and Technology (D.U.T) Report 2020.德国的数字化水平:2020 年糖尿病数字化与技术(D.U.T)报告的结果。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2022 Jan;16(1):144-151. doi: 10.1177/1932296820965553. Epub 2020 Oct 27.

本文引用的文献

1
4. Lifestyle Management: .4. 生活方式管理: 。
Diabetes Care. 2018 Jan;41(Suppl 1):S38-S50. doi: 10.2337/dc18-S004.
2
Risk Score for Detecting Dysglycemia: A Cross-Sectional Study of a Working-Age Population in an Oil Field in China.检测血糖异常的风险评分:中国某油田劳动年龄人群的横断面研究
Med Sci Monit. 2017 Jun 11;23:2833-2841. doi: 10.12659/msm.904449.
3
Diabetes incidence and prevalence in Hong Kong, China during 2006-2014.2006-2014 年期间中国香港的糖尿病发病率和患病率。
Diabet Med. 2017 Jul;34(7):902-908. doi: 10.1111/dme.13284. Epub 2016 Nov 29.
4
Development and Validation of a Risk-Score Model for Type 2 Diabetes: A Cohort Study of a Rural Adult Chinese Population.2型糖尿病风险评分模型的开发与验证:一项中国农村成年人群队列研究
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 12;11(4):e0152054. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152054. eCollection 2016.
5
Evaluation of the Finnish Diabetes Risk Score to predict type 2 diabetes mellitus in a Colombian population: A longitudinal observational study.评估芬兰糖尿病风险评分在哥伦比亚人群中预测2型糖尿病的效果:一项纵向观察性研究。
World J Diabetes. 2015 Dec 10;6(17):1337-44. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v6.i17.1337.
6
Evaluation of the Finnish Diabetes Risk Score (FINDRISC) for diabetes screening in occupational health care.芬兰糖尿病风险评分(FINDRISC)在职业健康护理中用于糖尿病筛查的评估。
Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2015;28(3):587-91. doi: 10.13075/ijomeh.1896.00407.
7
Detecting type 2 diabetes and prediabetes among asymptomatic adults in the United States: modeling American Diabetes Association versus US Preventive Services Task Force diabetes screening guidelines.检测美国无症状成年人的 2 型糖尿病和糖尿病前期:美国糖尿病协会与美国预防服务工作组糖尿病筛查指南的建模比较。
Popul Health Metr. 2014 May 7;12:12. doi: 10.1186/1478-7954-12-12. eCollection 2014.
8
Evaluation of Finnish Diabetes Risk Score in screening undiagnosed diabetes and prediabetes among U.S. adults by gender and race: NHANES 1999-2010.按性别和种族评估芬兰糖尿病风险评分在美国成年人中筛查未诊断糖尿病和糖尿病前期的情况:1999 - 2010年美国国家健康与营养检查调查
PLoS One. 2014 May 22;9(5):e97865. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0097865. eCollection 2014.
9
Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus.糖尿病的诊断与分类
Diabetes Care. 2014 Jan;37 Suppl 1:S81-90. doi: 10.2337/dc14-S081.
10
Finnish Diabetes Risk Score to predict type 2 diabetes in the Isfahan diabetes prevention study.在伊斯法罕糖尿病预防研究中使用芬兰糖尿病风险评分预测2型糖尿病
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2013 Dec;102(3):202-9. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2013.10.018. Epub 2013 Nov 4.