Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 May 23;7(11):e008069. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.008069.
Perceived social isolation has been shown to have a negative impact on health outcomes, particularly among older adults. However, these relationships have not been fully examined among patients with heart failure.
Residents from 11 southeast Minnesota counties with a first-ever () code 428 for heart failure between January 1, 2013, and March 31, 2015 (N=3867), were prospectively surveyed to measure perceived social isolation. A total of 2003 patients returned the survey (response rate, 52%); 1681 patients completed all questions and were retained for analysis. Among these patients (53% men; mean age, 73 years), ≈19% (n=312) had moderate perceived social isolation and 6% (n=108) had high perceived social isolation. After adjustment, patients reporting moderate perceived social isolation did not have an increased risk of death, hospitalizations, or emergency department visits compared with patients reporting low perceived social isolation; however, patients reporting high perceived social isolation had >3.5 times increased risk of death (hazard ratio, 3.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.82-7.70), 68% increased risk of hospitalization (hazard ratio, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.18-2.39), and 57% increased risk of emergency department visits (hazard ratio, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.09-2.27). Compared with patients who self-reported low perceived social isolation, patients reporting moderate perceived social isolation had a 16% increased risk of outpatient visits (rate ratio, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.03-1.31), whereas those reporting high perceived social isolation had a 26% increased risk (rate ratio, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.04-1.53).
In patients with heart failure, greater perceived social isolation is associated with an increased risk of death and healthcare use. Assessing perceived social isolation during the clinical encounter with a brief screening tool may help identify patients with heart failure at greater risk of poor outcomes.
已证实,感知到的社会隔离对健康结果有负面影响,尤其是在老年人中。然而,这些关系在心力衰竭患者中尚未得到充分研究。
2013 年 1 月 1 日至 2015 年 3 月 31 日期间,明尼苏达州东南部 11 个县的首次出现心力衰竭()代码 428 的居民接受了前瞻性调查,以衡量感知到的社会隔离程度。共有 2003 名患者返回了调查(回应率为 52%);1681 名患者完成了所有问题的回答并被保留用于分析。在这些患者中(53%为男性;平均年龄 73 岁),约 19%(n=312)存在中度感知社会隔离,6%(n=108)存在高度感知社会隔离。调整后,与报告低度感知社会隔离的患者相比,报告中度感知社会隔离的患者死亡、住院或急诊就诊的风险没有增加;然而,报告高度感知社会隔离的患者死亡风险增加了 3.5 倍以上(风险比,3.74;95%置信区间[CI],1.82-7.70),住院风险增加了 68%(风险比,1.68;95%CI,1.18-2.39),急诊就诊风险增加了 57%(风险比,1.57;95%CI,1.09-2.27)。与自我报告低度感知社会隔离的患者相比,报告中度感知社会隔离的患者门诊就诊的风险增加了 16%(发生率比,1.16;95%CI,1.03-1.31),而报告高度感知社会隔离的患者门诊就诊的风险增加了 26%(发生率比,1.26;95%CI,1.04-1.53)。
在心力衰竭患者中,感知到的社会隔离程度越高,死亡和医疗保健使用的风险就越大。在与患者进行临床接触时使用简短的筛查工具评估感知到的社会隔离情况,可能有助于识别出预后较差的心力衰竭患者。