Thong Ivan S K, Jensen Mark P, Miró Jordi, Tan Gabriel
Blk 49 Hume Ave #06-04, Singapore 598749, Singapore, Phone: +65 9856 7379.
National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Scand J Pain. 2018 Jan 26;18(1):99-107. doi: 10.1515/sjpain-2018-0012.
The Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Verbal Rating Scale (VRS), and Faces Pain Scale-Revised (FPS-R) are valid measures of pain intensity. However, ratings on these measures may be influenced by factors other than pain intensity. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of non-pain intensity factors on the pain intensity scales.
We administered measures of pain intensity (NRS, VAS, VRS, FPS-R), pain unpleasantness, catastrophizing, depressive symptoms, and pain interference to 101 individuals with chronic lower back or knee pain. Correlation analyses examined the associations among the pain intensity scales, and regression analyses evaluated the contributions of the non-pain intensity factors (depressive symptoms, and pain unpleasantness, catastrophizing, and interference) to the VAS, VRS, and FPS-R ratings, while controlling for NRS, age, and gender.
Although the NRS, VAS, VRS, FPR-S, scales were strongly associated with one another, supporting their validity as measures of pain intensity, regression analyses showed that the VRS also reflected pain interference, the FPS-R also reflected pain unpleasantness, and the VAS was not associated with any of the additional non-pain intensity factors when controlling for NRS, age, and gender.
The VAS appears to be most similar to the NRS and less influenced by non-pain intensity factors than the VRS or FPS-R. Although the VRS and FPS-R ratings both reflect pain intensity, they also contain additional information about pain interference and pain unpleasantness, respectively. These findings should be kept in mind when selecting pain measures and interpreting the results of research studies using these scales.
The influence of pain interference and pain unpleasantness on VRS and FPS-R, respectively should be kept in mind when selecting pain measures and interpreting the results of research studies using these scales.
数字评定量表(NRS)、视觉模拟量表(VAS)、语言评定量表(VRS)和面部疼痛量表修订版(FPS-R)都是有效的疼痛强度测量工具。然而,这些量表上的评分可能会受到疼痛强度以外的因素影响。本研究的目的是评估非疼痛强度因素对疼痛强度量表的影响。
我们对101名患有慢性下背部或膝盖疼痛的个体进行了疼痛强度测量(NRS、VAS、VRS、FPS-R)、疼痛不适感、灾难化思维、抑郁症状和疼痛干扰的测量。相关分析检验了疼痛强度量表之间的关联,回归分析评估了非疼痛强度因素(抑郁症状、疼痛不适感、灾难化思维和干扰)对VAS、VRS和FPS-R评分的贡献,同时控制了NRS、年龄和性别。
尽管NRS、VAS、VRS、FPR-S量表之间密切相关,支持它们作为疼痛强度测量工具的有效性,但回归分析表明,VRS还反映了疼痛干扰,FPS-R还反映了疼痛不适感,而在控制了NRS、年龄和性别后,VAS与任何其他非疼痛强度因素均无关联。
VAS似乎与NRS最为相似,并且比VRS或FPS-R受非疼痛强度因素的影响更小。尽管VRS和FPS-R评分都反映了疼痛强度,但它们还分别包含了有关疼痛干扰和疼痛不适感的额外信息。在选择疼痛测量工具和解释使用这些量表的研究结果时,应牢记这些发现。
在选择疼痛测量工具和解释使用这些量表的研究结果时,应分别牢记疼痛干扰和疼痛不适感对VRS和FPS-R的影响。