• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

慢性疼痛患者疼痛强度量表的可靠性和反应性。

Reliability and responsivity of pain intensity scales in individuals with chronic pain.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.

出版信息

Pain. 2022 Dec 1;163(12):e1184-e1191. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002692. Epub 2022 May 18.

DOI:10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002692
PMID:35584261
Abstract

Prior research supports the validity and short-term test-retest stability of 4 commonly used scales for assessing pain intensity (Visual Analogue Scale [VAS], 6-point Verbal Rating Scale [VRS-6], Numerical Rating Scale [NRS-11], and Face Pain Scale-Revised [FPS-R]). However, the relative stability and ability of these measures to detect changes in pain intensity over longer time periods have not yet been examined, although knowledge regarding these psychometric issues is important for selecting from among these measures. To address this knowledge gap, we administered these scales assessing worst and average pain intensity to 250 chronic pain outpatients on 2 occasions, a little over 6 weeks apart on average. All 4 scales were found to be valid for detecting decreases in pain, and the VAS, NRS-11, and FPS-R evidenced the most validity for detecting increases in pain. The NRS-11 and VAS evidenced better test-retest stability than the VRS-6 and FPS-R. Age affected the ability of the VRS-6 for detecting improvement in worst pain, as well as the ability of the VAS for detecting worsening in both worst and average pain. However, the psychometric properties of the scales were not influenced by education level. Overall, the NRS-11 emerged as showing the most sensitivity and stability. The FPS-R seems to be a good second choice to consider for samples of individuals who might have difficulty understanding or using the NRS-11.

摘要

先前的研究支持评估疼痛强度的 4 种常用量表(视觉模拟量表[VAS]、6 点口述评分量表[VRS-6]、数字评分量表[NRS-11]和修订面部疼痛量表[FPS-R])的有效性和短期重测信度。然而,这些测量方法在较长时间内评估疼痛强度变化的相对稳定性和能力尚未得到检验,尽管了解这些心理测量问题对于从这些测量方法中进行选择很重要。为了弥补这一知识空白,我们在平均间隔超过 6 周的 2 次就诊时,使用这些量表评估了 250 名慢性疼痛门诊患者的最差疼痛和平均疼痛强度。所有 4 种量表均被证明可有效检测疼痛减轻,VAS、NRS-11 和 FPS-R 最能有效检测疼痛增加。NRS-11 和 VAS 的重测信度优于 VRS-6 和 FPS-R。年龄会影响 VRS-6 检测最差疼痛改善的能力,以及 VAS 检测最差和平均疼痛恶化的能力。然而,量表的心理测量特性不受教育水平的影响。总体而言,NRS-11 显示出最高的敏感性和稳定性。对于可能难以理解或使用 NRS-11 的个体样本,FPS-R 似乎是一个很好的替代选择。

相似文献

1
Reliability and responsivity of pain intensity scales in individuals with chronic pain.慢性疼痛患者疼痛强度量表的可靠性和反应性。
Pain. 2022 Dec 1;163(12):e1184-e1191. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002692. Epub 2022 May 18.
2
The validity of pain intensity measures: what do the NRS, VAS, VRS, and FPS-R measure?疼痛强度测量的有效性:数字评定量表(NRS)、视觉模拟量表(VAS)、语言评定量表(VRS)和面部表情疼痛量表修订版(FPS-R)测量的是什么?
Scand J Pain. 2018 Jan 26;18(1):99-107. doi: 10.1515/sjpain-2018-0012.
3
Validity of four pain intensity rating scales.四种疼痛强度评分量表的效度。
Pain. 2011 Oct;152(10):2399-2404. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2011.07.005.
4
Test-retest reliability, validity, and minimum detectable change of visual analog, numerical rating, and verbal rating scales for measurement of osteoarthritic knee pain.用于测量骨关节炎膝关节疼痛的视觉模拟评分、数字评分和语言评分量表的重测信度、效度及最小可检测变化
J Pain Res. 2018 Apr 26;11:851-856. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S158847. eCollection 2018.
5
Measuring pain intensity in older patients: a comparison of five scales.测量老年患者的疼痛强度:五种量表的比较。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Jun 25;24(1):556. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05127-6.
6
The Utility and Construct Validity of Four Measures of Pain Intensity: Results from a University-Based Study in Spain.四种疼痛强度测量方法的效用与结构效度:来自西班牙一项大学研究的结果
Pain Med. 2019 Dec 1;20(12):2411-2420. doi: 10.1093/pm/pny319.
7
Postoperative pain intensity assessment: a comparison of four scales in Chinese adults.术后疼痛强度评估:中国成年人四种量表的比较
Pain Med. 2007 Apr;8(3):223-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2007.00296.x.
8
The psychometric properties of an Arabic numeric pain rating scale for measuring osteoarthritis knee pain.用于测量骨关节炎膝关节疼痛的阿拉伯数字疼痛评定量表的心理测量学特性。
Disabil Rehabil. 2016 Dec;38(24):2392-7. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2015.1129441. Epub 2016 Jan 6.
9
Validity of three rating scales for measuring pain intensity in youths with physical disabilities.三种用于测量身体残疾青少年疼痛强度的评定量表的效度
Eur J Pain. 2016 Jan;20(1):130-7. doi: 10.1002/ejp.704. Epub 2015 Mar 31.
10
Validity and Utility of Four Pain Intensity Measures for Use in International Research.四种疼痛强度测量方法在国际研究中的有效性和实用性。
J Pain Res. 2021 Apr 21;14:1129-1139. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S303305. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical Evidence of Acupoint Stimulation for Primary Dysmenorrhea: A Systematic Review and Updated Meta-Analysis.穴位刺激治疗原发性痛经的临床证据:系统评价与更新的荟萃分析
J Pain Res. 2025 Aug 24;18:4307-4336. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S533585. eCollection 2025.
2
PAPIMI Short Effect on Pain Perception and Heart Rate Variability in Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain: A Pilot Study.PAPIMI对慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛患者疼痛感知及心率变异性的短期影响:一项初步研究。
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Aug 15;13(16):2006. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13162006.
3
The efficacy of a clustered group-based acceptance and commitment therapy for patients with chronic pain - a randomized controlled semi-crossover trial.
基于群组的接纳与承诺疗法对慢性疼痛患者的疗效——一项随机对照半交叉试验
Can J Pain. 2025 Jul 31;9(1):2515106. doi: 10.1080/24740527.2025.2515106. eCollection 2025.
4
The effect of three different apical termini on postoperative pain in teeth with irreversible pulpitis: a prospective clinical study.三种不同根尖止点对不可逆性牙髓炎患牙术后疼痛的影响:一项前瞻性临床研究。
Head Face Med. 2025 Jul 21;21(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s13005-025-00531-8.
5
Etiological basis for chronic pain genetic variation in brain and dorsal root ganglia cell types.大脑和背根神经节细胞类型中慢性疼痛遗传变异的病因学基础。
medRxiv. 2025 Jul 5:2025.07.03.25330832. doi: 10.1101/2025.07.03.25330832.
6
Pain and lymphedema characteristics of women with breast cancer-related lymphedema with and without type 2 diabetes mellitus.患有和未患有2型糖尿病的乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿女性的疼痛和淋巴水肿特征
Support Care Cancer. 2025 Jul 8;33(8):666. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09728-8.
7
Associations Between Pain Intensity and Inflammatory Profile in Women with Android and Gynoid Obesity Diagnosed with Chronic Pain: An Observational Study.诊断为慢性疼痛的男性型和女性型肥胖女性的疼痛强度与炎症特征之间的关联:一项观察性研究。
J Clin Med. 2025 Jun 12;14(12):4170. doi: 10.3390/jcm14124170.
8
Predictive relationship in perioperative symptoms and step count for lung cancer patients.肺癌患者围手术期症状与步数的预测关系。
Support Care Cancer. 2025 Jun 7;33(7):554. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09542-2.
9
Gene discovery and pleiotropic architecture of chronic pain in a genome-wide association study of >1.2 million individuals.超过120万人的全基因组关联研究中慢性疼痛的基因发现与多效性结构
Res Sq. 2025 Apr 10:rs.3.rs-6173614. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-6173614/v1.
10
Radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy for pain and function in adults with knee osteoarthritis: protocol for a placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial.用于治疗成人膝关节骨关节炎疼痛和功能障碍的桡骨体外冲击波疗法:一项安慰剂对照随机临床试验方案
Trials. 2025 Apr 25;26(1):139. doi: 10.1186/s13063-025-08844-4.