Suppr超能文献

皮肤科手术患者疼痛强度评估量表:系统评价。

Pain Intensity Assessment Scales for Dermatologic Surgery Patients: A Systematic Review.

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

Health Sciences Library System, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

出版信息

Dermatol Surg. 2022 Feb 1;48(2):232-238. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000003353.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pain assessment plays an important role in dermatologic surgery. The numeric rating scale (NRS), visual analog scale (VAS), verbal rating scale (VRS), and Faces Pain Scale (FPS) are commonly used scales for pain measurement. Conflicting evidence exists regarding the use of each. Prompt pain recognition and treatment during procedures result in higher patient satisfaction.

OBJECTIVE

Determine the most applicable scale for acute pain measurement in dermatologic surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This systematic review was performed in accordance with PRISMA-Supplemental Digital Content 4, http://links.lww.com/DSS/A976 (PROSPERO; CRD42018091058). PubMed, Cochrane, EMBASE, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched between April 24, 2018, and May 06, 2018. The search query consisted of pain, pain measurement (NRS, VAS, VRS, and FPS), and assessment/comparison. The inclusion criteria included English language literature with primary/secondary outcome objectives directly comparing ≥2 pain scales in acute pain (age: 13+). Study end points included interscale correlations, patient preferences, provider preferences, study author recommendations, and failure rates.

RESULTS

Eight hundred seven studies were retrieved: A total of 42 studies were included. The visual analog scale (n = 42) was most studied, followed by NRS (n = 29), VRS (n = 27), and FPS (n = 11). 93.1% studies showed a high statistical correlation between VAS and NRS. Patients preferred NRS (n = 8/11), followed by FPS (n = 3/11), VRS (n = 2/11), and VAS (n = 1/11). Study authors recommended NRS/VAS (n = 8/19), VRS (n = 6/19), and FPS (n = 1/19). Providers preferred NRS (n = 2/3) and VRS (n = 1/3). The visual analog scale had the highest failure rate (n = 11/12).

CONCLUSION

The numeric rating scale is most applicable for dermatologic surgery because of reported patient and provider preferences, lowest failure rates, and most frequent study author recommendations.

摘要

背景

疼痛评估在皮肤科手术中起着重要作用。数字评分量表(NRS)、视觉模拟量表(VAS)、言语评分量表(VRS)和面部疼痛量表(FPS)是常用于疼痛测量的量表。关于每种量表的使用,存在相互矛盾的证据。在手术过程中及时识别和治疗疼痛可以提高患者的满意度。

目的

确定皮肤科手术中用于急性疼痛测量的最适用量表。

材料和方法

本系统评价按照 PRISMA-补充数字内容 4(http://links.lww.com/DSS/A976(PROSPERO;CRD42018091058)进行。检索了 2018 年 4 月 24 日至 2018 年 5 月 6 日期间的 PubMed、Cochrane、EMBASE、Scopus 和 Web of Science。搜索查询由疼痛、疼痛测量(NRS、VAS、VRS 和 FPS)和评估/比较组成。纳入标准包括直接比较≥2 种急性疼痛量表的主要/次要研究目标的英语文献(年龄:13+)。研究终点包括量表间相关性、患者偏好、提供者偏好、研究作者建议和失败率。

结果

共检索到 807 项研究:共有 42 项研究被纳入。视觉模拟量表(n=42)的研究最多,其次是 NRS(n=29)、VRS(n=27)和 FPS(n=11)。93.1%的研究显示 VAS 和 NRS 之间具有高度统计学相关性。患者更喜欢 NRS(n=8/11),其次是 FPS(n=3/11)、VRS(n=2/11)和 VAS(n=1/11)。研究作者建议 NRS/VAS(n=8/19)、VRS(n=6/19)和 FPS(n=1/19)。提供者更喜欢 NRS(n=2/3)和 VRS(n=1/3)。视觉模拟量表的失败率最高(n=11/12)。

结论

由于报告的患者和提供者偏好、最低的失败率以及最常见的研究作者建议,数字评分量表最适用于皮肤科手术。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验