Suppr超能文献

混合格式量表中措辞效应的项目反应理论模型

Item Response Theory Models for Wording Effects in Mixed-Format Scales.

作者信息

Wang Wen-Chung, Chen Hui-Fang, Jin Kuan-Yu

机构信息

The Hong Kong Institute of Education, Hong Kong SAR.

City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR.

出版信息

Educ Psychol Meas. 2015 Feb;75(1):157-178. doi: 10.1177/0013164414528209. Epub 2014 Apr 6.

Abstract

Many scales contain both positively and negatively worded items. Reverse recoding of negatively worded items might not be enough for them to function as positively worded items do. In this study, we commented on the drawbacks of existing approaches to wording effect in mixed-format scales and used bi-factor item response theory (IRT) models to test the assumption of reverse coding and evaluate the magnitude of the wording effect. The parameters of the bi-factor IRT models can be estimated with existing computer programs. Two empirical examples from the Program for International Student Assessment and the Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study were given to demonstrate the advantages of the bi-factor approach over traditional ones. It was found that the wording effect in these two data sets was substantial and that ignoring the wording effect resulted in overestimated test reliability and biased person measures.

摘要

许多量表同时包含正向表述和负向表述的项目。对负向表述的项目进行反向编码,可能不足以使其发挥正向表述项目的作用。在本研究中,我们评论了混合格式量表中现有措辞效应方法的缺点,并使用双因素项目反应理论(IRT)模型来检验反向编码的假设,并评估措辞效应的大小。双因素IRT模型的参数可以用现有的计算机程序进行估计。给出了国际学生评估项目和国际数学与科学研究趋势中的两个实证例子,以证明双因素方法相对于传统方法的优势。研究发现,这两个数据集中的措辞效应相当大,而忽略措辞效应会导致测试信度被高估和个体测量有偏差。

相似文献

1
Item Response Theory Models for Wording Effects in Mixed-Format Scales.
Educ Psychol Meas. 2015 Feb;75(1):157-178. doi: 10.1177/0013164414528209. Epub 2014 Apr 6.
2
How does item wording affect participants' responses in Likert scale? Evidence from IRT analysis.
Front Psychol. 2024 Oct 4;15:1304870. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1304870. eCollection 2024.
3
A Multilevel Bifactor Approach to Construct Validation of Mixed-Format Scales.
Educ Psychol Meas. 2018 Apr;78(2):253-271. doi: 10.1177/0013164417690858. Epub 2017 Oct 11.
4
Direction of wording and responses to items in oral health-related quality of life questionnaires for children and their parents.
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2007 Aug;35(4):255-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2007.00320.x.
5
A Study of Reverse-Worded Matched Item Pairs Using the Generalized Partial Credit and Nominal Response Models.
Educ Psychol Meas. 2018 Feb;78(1):103-127. doi: 10.1177/0013164416670211. Epub 2016 Oct 6.
6
The Impact of Item Feature and Response Preference in a Mixed-Format Design.
Multivariate Behav Res. 2022 Mar-May;57(2-3):208-222. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2020.1820308. Epub 2020 Oct 1.
8
Response tendencies due to item wording using eye-tracking methodology accounting for individual differences and item characteristics.
Behav Res Methods. 2022 Oct;54(5):2252-2270. doi: 10.3758/s13428-021-01719-x. Epub 2022 Jan 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Systematic comparison of resilience scales using retrospective reports: A practical case study using South African data.
Afr J Psychol Assess. 2024 Jul 17;6:150. doi: 10.4102/ajopa.v6i0.150. eCollection 2024.
2
How does item wording affect participants' responses in Likert scale? Evidence from IRT analysis.
Front Psychol. 2024 Oct 4;15:1304870. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1304870. eCollection 2024.
3
Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Processes and Mediation: Challenges and How to Address Them.
Behav Ther. 2023 Nov;54(6):971-988. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2022.07.005. Epub 2022 Jul 16.
4
Modeling insufficient effort responses in mixed-worded scales.
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Mar;56(3):2260-2272. doi: 10.3758/s13428-023-02146-w. Epub 2023 Jun 21.
5
A New Approach to Desirable Responding: Multidimensional Item Response Model of Overclaiming Data.
Appl Psychol Meas. 2023 May;47(3):221-236. doi: 10.1177/01466216231151704. Epub 2023 Jan 19.
8
Measuring Well-Being in Sport Performers: Where are We Now and How do we Progress?
Sports Med. 2020 Jul;50(7):1255-1270. doi: 10.1007/s40279-020-01274-z.
9
The Bayesian Multilevel Trifactor Item Response Theory Model.
Educ Psychol Meas. 2019 Jun;79(3):462-494. doi: 10.1177/0013164418806694. Epub 2018 Nov 17.
10
Balanced and positively worded personality short-forms: Mini-IPIP validity and cross-cultural invariance.
PeerJ. 2018 Sep 13;6:e5542. doi: 10.7717/peerj.5542. eCollection 2018.

本文引用的文献

1
Method effects: the problem with negatively versus positively keyed items.
J Pers Assess. 2012;94(2):196-204. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2011.645936.
3
Utility of the Rosenberg self-esteem scale.
Am J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2009 May;114(3):172-8. doi: 10.1352/1944-7558-114.3.172.
4
The role of the bifactor model in resolving dimensionality issues in health outcomes measures.
Qual Life Res. 2007;16 Suppl 1:19-31. doi: 10.1007/s11136-007-9183-7. Epub 2007 May 4.
5
Improving measurement precision of test batteries using multidimensional item response models.
Psychol Methods. 2004 Mar;9(1):116-36. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.9.1.116.
6
Validity and factorial invariance of the Social Physique Anxiety Scale.
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000 May;32(5):1007-17. doi: 10.1097/00005768-200005000-00020.
7
Positive and negative global self-esteem: a substantively meaningful distinction or artifactors?
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1996 Apr;70(4):810-9. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.70.4.810.
8
Development and validation of a geriatric depression screening scale: a preliminary report.
J Psychiatr Res. 1982;17(1):37-49. doi: 10.1016/0022-3956(82)90033-4.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验