Marsh H W
Faculty of Education, University of Western Sydney, Campbelltown, New South Wales, Australia.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1996 Apr;70(4):810-9. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.70.4.810.
Global self-esteem based on M. Rosenberg's (1965) scale is typically treated as a unidimensional scale. However, factor analyses suggest separate factors associated with positively and negatively worded items, and there is an ongoing debate about the substantive meaningfulness of this distinction. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to evaluate alternative 1- and 2-factor models and to test hypotheses about how the factors vary with reading ability and age. Responses based on the National Longitudinal Study of 1988 (S.J. Ingles et al., 1992) reflected a relatively unidimensional factor and method effects associated with negatively worded items. Such effects are common in rating scale responses, and this CFA approach may be useful in evaluating whether factors associated with positively and negatively worded items are substantively meaningful or artifactors.
基于M. 罗森伯格（1965年）量表的总体自尊通常被视为一个单维量表。然而，因子分析表明，与正向和负向措辞项目相关的是不同的因子，并且关于这种区分的实质意义存在持续的争论。验证性因子分析（CFA）被用于评估替代的单因子和双因子模型，并检验关于这些因子如何随阅读能力和年龄而变化的假设。基于1988年全国纵向研究（S.J. 英格尔斯等人，1992年）的回答反映出一个相对单维的因子以及与负向措辞项目相关的方法效应。这种效应在量表回答中很常见，并且这种CFA方法可能有助于评估与正向和负向措辞项目相关的因子在实质上是否有意义或是否是人为因素。
