Suppr超能文献

老年抑郁筛查量表的编制与验证:初步报告

Development and validation of a geriatric depression screening scale: a preliminary report.

作者信息

Yesavage J A, Brink T L, Rose T L, Lum O, Huang V, Adey M, Leirer V O

出版信息

J Psychiatr Res. 1982;17(1):37-49. doi: 10.1016/0022-3956(82)90033-4.

Abstract

A new Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) designed specifically for rating depression in the elderly was tested for reliability and validity and compared with the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRS-D) and the Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS). In constructing the GDS a 100-item questionnaire was administered to normal and severely depressed subjects. The 30 questions most highly correlated with the total scores were then selected and readministered to new groups of elderly subjects. These subjects were classified as normal, mildly depressed or severely depressed on the basis of Research Diagnostic Criteria (RDC) for depression. The GDS, HRS-D and SDS were all found to be internally consistent measures, and each of the scales was correlated with the subject's number of RDC symptoms. However, the GDS and the HRS-D were significantly better correlated with RDC symptoms than was the SDS. The authors suggest that the GDS represents a reliable and valid self-rating depression screening scale for elderly populations.

摘要

一种专门为评估老年人抑郁症而设计的新型老年抑郁量表(GDS)进行了信效度测试,并与汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表(HRS-D)和zung自评抑郁量表(SDS)进行了比较。在构建GDS时,向正常和重度抑郁受试者发放了一份包含100个条目的问卷。然后选择与总分相关性最高的30个问题,并重新发放给新的老年受试者群体。根据抑郁症的研究诊断标准(RDC),将这些受试者分为正常、轻度抑郁或重度抑郁。结果发现,GDS、HRS-D和SDS都是内部一致性较好的测量工具,且每个量表都与受试者的RDC症状数量相关。然而,GDS和HRS-D与RDC症状的相关性明显优于SDS。作者认为,GDS是一种可靠且有效的老年人群自评抑郁筛查量表。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验