Suppr超能文献

老年抑郁筛查量表的编制与验证:初步报告

Development and validation of a geriatric depression screening scale: a preliminary report.

作者信息

Yesavage J A, Brink T L, Rose T L, Lum O, Huang V, Adey M, Leirer V O

出版信息

J Psychiatr Res. 1982;17(1):37-49. doi: 10.1016/0022-3956(82)90033-4.

Abstract

A new Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) designed specifically for rating depression in the elderly was tested for reliability and validity and compared with the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRS-D) and the Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS). In constructing the GDS a 100-item questionnaire was administered to normal and severely depressed subjects. The 30 questions most highly correlated with the total scores were then selected and readministered to new groups of elderly subjects. These subjects were classified as normal, mildly depressed or severely depressed on the basis of Research Diagnostic Criteria (RDC) for depression. The GDS, HRS-D and SDS were all found to be internally consistent measures, and each of the scales was correlated with the subject's number of RDC symptoms. However, the GDS and the HRS-D were significantly better correlated with RDC symptoms than was the SDS. The authors suggest that the GDS represents a reliable and valid self-rating depression screening scale for elderly populations.

摘要

一种专门为评估老年人抑郁症而设计的新型老年抑郁量表(GDS)进行了信效度测试,并与汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表(HRS-D)和zung自评抑郁量表(SDS)进行了比较。在构建GDS时,向正常和重度抑郁受试者发放了一份包含100个条目的问卷。然后选择与总分相关性最高的30个问题,并重新发放给新的老年受试者群体。根据抑郁症的研究诊断标准(RDC),将这些受试者分为正常、轻度抑郁或重度抑郁。结果发现,GDS、HRS-D和SDS都是内部一致性较好的测量工具,且每个量表都与受试者的RDC症状数量相关。然而,GDS和HRS-D与RDC症状的相关性明显优于SDS。作者认为,GDS是一种可靠且有效的老年人群自评抑郁筛查量表。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验