Kam Chester Chun Seng, Zhou Mingming
University of Macau, Taipa, Macau, China.
Educ Psychol Meas. 2015 Oct;75(5):764-784. doi: 10.1177/0013164414560817. Epub 2014 Nov 27.
Previous research has found the effects of acquiescence to be generally consistent across item within a single survey (i.e., essential tau-equivalence), but it is unknown whether this phenomenon is consistent at the level. This article evaluated the often assumed but inadequately tested proposition that individual items are affected by acquiescence to the same degree. We modeled an external acquiescence criterion to assess (a) whether it affected scale items consistently and (b) whether it would be strongly correlated with an acquiescence factor based on an assumption of tau-equivalence. The results did not support this assumption. As further evidence, we identified a situation in which this tau-equivalence assumption could potentially be violated. We propose that the response style be best understood within a framework of an acquiescence × item interaction.
先前的研究发现,在单一调查中,默许效应在各个项目之间总体上是一致的(即基本的tau等效性),但尚不清楚这种现象在总体水平上是否一致。本文评估了一个常被假定但未得到充分检验的命题,即各个项目受默许效应的影响程度相同。我们构建了一个外部默许标准,以评估(a)它是否对量表项目产生一致的影响,以及(b)基于tau等效性假设,它是否会与一个默许因子高度相关。结果并不支持这一假设。作为进一步的证据,我们发现了一种可能违反这种tau等效性假设的情况。我们建议,最好在默许×项目交互作用的框架内理解这种反应方式。