• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

异质人群的量表信度评估

Scale Reliability Evaluation With Heterogeneous Populations.

作者信息

Raykov Tenko, Marcoulides George A

机构信息

Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.

University of California at Santa Barbara, CA, USA.

出版信息

Educ Psychol Meas. 2015 Oct;75(5):875-892. doi: 10.1177/0013164414558587. Epub 2014 Nov 25.

DOI:10.1177/0013164414558587
PMID:29795845
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5965514/
Abstract

A latent variable modeling approach for scale reliability evaluation in heterogeneous populations is discussed. The method can be used for point and interval estimation of reliability of multicomponent measuring instruments in populations representing mixtures of an unknown number of latent classes or subpopulations. The procedure is helpful also for evaluation of possible between-class reliability differences as well as of within-class reliability coefficients. The estimation approach can similarly be used in empirical settings with known class membership when distinct populations are investigated, their number is known beforehand and membership in them is observed for the studied subjects, or alternatively in settings where only the number of latent classes is known. A modification and extension of the method for evaluation of maximal reliability or coefficient alpha in heterogeneous populations are also outlined. The discussed procedure is illustrated with numerical data.

摘要

讨论了一种用于异质人群量表信度评估的潜在变量建模方法。该方法可用于对代表未知数量潜在类别或亚人群混合体的人群中多成分测量工具的信度进行点估计和区间估计。该程序对于评估类间可能的信度差异以及类内信度系数也很有帮助。当研究不同人群时,如果已知类别成员身份、预先知道其数量并且观察到研究对象在其中的成员身份,或者在仅知道潜在类别的数量的情况下,该估计方法同样可以用于实证研究。还概述了该方法在异质人群中评估最大信度或α系数的修改和扩展。用数值数据说明了所讨论的程序。

相似文献

1
Scale Reliability Evaluation With Heterogeneous Populations.异质人群的量表信度评估
Educ Psychol Meas. 2015 Oct;75(5):875-892. doi: 10.1177/0013164414558587. Epub 2014 Nov 25.
2
Multiple-Component Measurement Instruments in Heterogeneous Populations: Is There a Single Coefficient Alpha?异质群体中的多成分测量工具:是否存在单一的α系数?
Educ Psychol Meas. 2019 Apr;79(2):399-412. doi: 10.1177/0013164417733305. Epub 2017 Oct 4.
3
Evaluation of Measurement Instrument Criterion Validity in Finite Mixture Settings.有限混合模型下测量工具效标效度的评估
Educ Psychol Meas. 2016 Dec;76(6):1026-1044. doi: 10.1177/0013164415613542. Epub 2015 Nov 2.
4
Reliability of Scales With Second-Order Structure: Evaluation of Coefficient Alpha's Population Slippage Using Latent Variable Modeling.具有二阶结构量表的信度:使用潜在变量模型评估系数α的总体偏差
Educ Psychol Meas. 2018 Dec;78(6):1123-1135. doi: 10.1177/0013164417719948. Epub 2017 Jul 24.
5
A Direct Latent Variable Modeling Based Method for Point and Interval Estimation of Coefficient Alpha.一种基于直接潜变量建模的系数Alpha点估计和区间估计方法。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2015 Feb;75(1):146-156. doi: 10.1177/0013164414526039. Epub 2014 Apr 1.
6
Studying Latent Criterion Validity for Complex Structure Measuring Instruments Using Latent Variable Modeling.使用潜在变量建模研究复杂结构测量工具的潜在准则效度。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2018 Oct;78(5):905-917. doi: 10.1177/0013164417698017. Epub 2017 Mar 26.
7
Do Two or More Multicomponent Instruments Measure the Same Construct? Testing Construct Congruence Using Latent Variable Modeling.两种或更多种多成分工具测量的是同一结构吗?使用潜在变量模型检验结构一致性。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2016 Oct;76(5):873-884. doi: 10.1177/0013164415604705. Epub 2015 Sep 17.
8
Evaluation of Polytomous Item Locations in Multicomponent Measuring Instruments: A Note on a Latent Variable Modeling Procedure.多成分测量仪器中多分类项目位置的评估:关于一种潜在变量建模程序的说明
Educ Psychol Meas. 2023 Jun;83(3):630-641. doi: 10.1177/00131644211072829. Epub 2022 Mar 2.
9
On the Pitfalls of Estimating and Using Standardized Reliability Coefficients.论标准化信度系数估计与使用中的陷阱
Educ Psychol Meas. 2021 Aug;81(4):791-810. doi: 10.1177/0013164420937345. Epub 2020 Jul 4.
10
Design Effect in Multilevel Settings: A Commentary on a Latent Variable Modeling Procedure for Its Evaluation.多层次环境中的设计效应:对其评估的潜在变量建模程序的评论
Educ Psychol Meas. 2022 Oct;82(5):1020-1030. doi: 10.1177/00131644211019447. Epub 2021 Jun 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Elements of burden among informal caregivers of community-dwelling older adults receiving home care nursing: a cross-sectional study on health status, well-being, and gender differences.接受家庭护理的社区居家老年人非正式照料者的负担因素:一项关于健康状况、幸福感和性别差异的横断面研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2025 Aug 14;25(1):623. doi: 10.1186/s12877-025-06320-x.
2
Overestimation of Internal Consistency by Coefficient Omega in Data Giving Rise to a Centroid-Like Factor Solution.在产生类质心因子解的数据中,欧米茄系数对内部一致性的高估。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2025 Feb 13:00131644241313447. doi: 10.1177/00131644241313447.
3
Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the sport success scale: a confirmatory study on Chinese adolescents.《运动成功量表中文版的心理测量学特性:对中国青少年的验证性研究》
BMC Psychol. 2024 Nov 7;12(1):636. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-02079-9.
4
On the Relationship Between Item Stem Formulation and Criterion Validity of Multiple-Component Measuring Instruments.关于多成分测量工具的题目表述与效标效度之间的关系
Educ Psychol Meas. 2022 Apr;82(2):356-375. doi: 10.1177/0013164420988169. Epub 2021 Feb 8.
5
Measuring achievement emotions questionnaire for physical education (AEQ-PE): a confirmatory study in Malay language.体育成就情绪问卷(AEQ-PE)的测量:在马来语中的验证性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Oct 7;21(1):1798. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11869-4.
6
Psychometric Properties of the Malay-Language Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Scale: A Confirmatory Study on Malaysian Children.马来语生活享受和满意度量表的心理测量特性:对马来西亚儿童的验证性研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 13;18(2):622. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18020622.
7
Accounting for Differential Item Functioning Using Bayesian Approximate Measurement Invariance.使用贝叶斯近似测量不变性来解释项目功能差异
Educ Psychol Meas. 2020 Aug;80(4):638-664. doi: 10.1177/0013164419887482. Epub 2019 Dec 4.
8
Multiple-Component Measurement Instruments in Heterogeneous Populations: Is There a Single Coefficient Alpha?异质群体中的多成分测量工具:是否存在单一的α系数?
Educ Psychol Meas. 2019 Apr;79(2):399-412. doi: 10.1177/0013164417733305. Epub 2017 Oct 4.
9
Predicting career sector intent and the theory of planned behaviour: survey findings from Australian veterinary science students.预测职业领域意向与计划行为理论:来自澳大利亚兽医专业学生的调查结果
BMC Vet Res. 2019 Jan 15;15(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s12917-018-1725-4.
10
Evaluation of Measurement Instrument Criterion Validity in Finite Mixture Settings.有限混合模型下测量工具效标效度的评估
Educ Psychol Meas. 2016 Dec;76(6):1026-1044. doi: 10.1177/0013164415613542. Epub 2015 Nov 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Examining Measurement Invariance and Differential Item Functioning With Discrete Latent Construct Indicators: A Note on a Multiple Testing Procedure.使用离散潜在结构指标检验测量不变性和项目功能差异:关于多重检验程序的一则说明
Educ Psychol Meas. 2018 Apr;78(2):343-352. doi: 10.1177/0013164416670984. Epub 2016 Oct 25.
2
A Direct Latent Variable Modeling Based Method for Point and Interval Estimation of Coefficient Alpha.一种基于直接潜变量建模的系数Alpha点估计和区间估计方法。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2015 Feb;75(1):146-156. doi: 10.1177/0013164414526039. Epub 2014 Apr 1.
3
On the Relationship Between Maximal Reliability and Maximal Validity of Linear Composites.线性组合的最大信度与最大效度之间的关系
Multivariate Behav Res. 2006 Jun 1;41(2):105-26. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr4102_1.
4
Investigating population heterogeneity with factor mixture models.使用因子混合模型研究群体异质性。
Psychol Methods. 2005 Mar;10(1):21-39. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.10.1.21.