多部件测量仪器的可靠性会取决于反应选项呈现模式吗？
Can Reliability of Multiple Component Measuring Instruments Depend on Response Option Presentation Mode?
作者信息
Menold Natalja, Raykov Tenko
机构信息
Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, Mannheim, Germany.
Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
出版信息
Educ Psychol Meas. 2016 Jun;76(3):454-469. doi: 10.1177/0013164415593602. Epub 2015 Jul 8.
Abstract
This article examines the possible dependency of composite reliability on presentation format of the elements of a multi-item measuring instrument. Using empirical data and a recent method for interval estimation of group differences in reliability, we demonstrate that the reliability of an instrument need not be the same when polarity of the response options for its individual components differs across administrations of the instrument. Implications for empirical educational, behavioral, and social research are discussed.
摘要
本文探讨了复合信度对多项目测量工具各元素呈现形式的可能依赖性。利用实证数据和一种用于信度组间差异区间估计的最新方法，我们证明，当该测量工具各单独成分的反应选项极性在工具的不同施测中存在差异时，其信度不一定相同。文中还讨论了对实证性教育、行为和社会研究的启示。
相似文献
1
Can Reliability of Multiple Component Measuring Instruments Depend on Response Option Presentation Mode?多部件测量仪器的可靠性会取决于反应选项呈现模式吗？
Educ Psychol Meas. 2016 Jun;76(3):454-469. doi: 10.1177/0013164415593602. Epub 2015 Jul 8.
2
On the Relationship Between Item Stem Formulation and Criterion Validity of Multiple-Component Measuring Instruments.关于多成分测量工具的题目表述与效标效度之间的关系
Educ Psychol Meas. 2022 Apr;82(2):356-375. doi: 10.1177/0013164420988169. Epub 2021 Feb 8.
3
On the Benefits of Using Maximal Reliability in Educational and Behavioral Research.论在教育与行为研究中使用最大可靠性的益处。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2024 Oct;84(5):994-1011. doi: 10.1177/00131644231215771. Epub 2023 Dec 27.
4
Evaluation of Polytomous Item Locations in Multicomponent Measuring Instruments: A Note on a Latent Variable Modeling Procedure.多成分测量仪器中多分类项目位置的评估：关于一种潜在变量建模程序的说明
Educ Psychol Meas. 2023 Jun;83(3):630-641. doi: 10.1177/00131644211072829. Epub 2022 Mar 2.
5
Examining group differences in reliability of multiple-component instruments.检验多成分仪器可靠性方面的组间差异。
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2002 May;55(Pt 1):145-58. doi: 10.1348/000711002159743.
6
Development of the headache activities of daily living index: initial validity study.头痛日常生活活动指数的编制：初始效度研究
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2015 Feb;38(2):102-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2014.12.002. Epub 2015 Jan 21.
7
The measurement of collaboration within healthcare settings: a systematic review of measurement properties of instruments.医疗机构内协作的测量：对测量工具属性的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):138-97. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-2159.
8
Examining change in maximal reliability for multiple-component measuring instruments.检验多组件测量仪器的最大可靠性变化。
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2005 May;58(Pt 1):65-82. doi: 10.1348/000711005X38753.
9
Multiple-Component Measurement Instruments in Heterogeneous Populations: Is There a Single Coefficient Alpha?异质群体中的多成分测量工具：是否存在单一的α系数？
Educ Psychol Meas. 2019 Apr;79(2):399-412. doi: 10.1177/0013164417733305. Epub 2017 Oct 4.
10
Estimation of maximal reliability for multiple-component instruments in multilevel designs.多级设计中多组件仪器的最大可靠性估计。
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2009 Feb;62(Pt 1):129-42. doi: 10.1348/000711007X255345. Epub 2007 Nov 13.
引用本文的文献
1
Measuring Unipolar Traits With Continuous Response Items: Some Methodological and Substantive Developments.使用连续反应项目测量单极特质：一些方法学和实质性进展。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2024 Jun;84(3):425-449. doi: 10.1177/00131644231181889. Epub 2023 Jun 26.
2
On the Relationship Between Item Stem Formulation and Criterion Validity of Multiple-Component Measuring Instruments.关于多成分测量工具的题目表述与效标效度之间的关系
Educ Psychol Meas. 2022 Apr;82(2):356-375. doi: 10.1177/0013164420988169. Epub 2021 Feb 8.
本文引用的文献
1
Examining Measurement Invariance and Differential Item Functioning With Discrete Latent Construct Indicators: A Note on a Multiple Testing Procedure.使用离散潜在结构指标检验测量不变性和项目功能差异：关于多重检验程序的一则说明
Educ Psychol Meas. 2018 Apr;78(2):343-352. doi: 10.1177/0013164416670984. Epub 2016 Oct 25.
2
Scale Reliability Evaluation With Heterogeneous Populations.异质人群的量表信度评估
Educ Psychol Meas. 2015 Oct;75(5):875-892. doi: 10.1177/0013164414558587. Epub 2014 Nov 25.
3
Reliability of multi-category rating scales.多类目评定量表的信度。
J Sch Psychol. 2013 Apr;51(2):217-29. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2012.12.003. Epub 2013 Jan 13.
4
Rating scales, discriminability, and information transmission.评分量表、辨别力与信息传递。
Psychol Rev. 1960 Nov;67:343-52. doi: 10.1037/h0043047.
5
Optimal number of response categories in rating scales: reliability, validity, discriminating power, and respondent preferences.评定量表中最佳反应类别数量：信度、效度、区分力及应答者偏好
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2000 Mar;104(1):1-15. doi: 10.1016/s0001-6918(99)00050-5.
6
The approximate sampling distribution of Kuder-Richardson reliability coefficient twenty.库德-理查森信度系数20的近似抽样分布。
Psychometrika. 1965 Sep;30(3):357-70. doi: 10.1007/BF02289499.
Zotero 插件