Pavol Marykay A, Willey Joshua Z, Wei Ying, Yuzefpolskaya Melana, Marshall Randolph S, Marascalco Philip J, Harwood Jason, Lazar Ronald M
Stroke Division, Department of Neurology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Department of Biostatistics, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Aug;66(8):456-463. doi: 10.1007/s11748-018-0947-5. Epub 2018 May 23.
Studies of cognition after LVAD surgery have produced mixed results. To explore whether cognition would improve, decline, or remain stable after LVAD surgery, we examined cognition before and 1- and 3-months after LVAD surgery. Patients with post-surgical stroke were excluded.
28 subjects (mean age = 54.31 ± 12 years) comprised an observational case series from the DuraHeart LVAS device® trial. Cognitive testing was performed at baseline, 1-month, and 3-month post-surgery, and included tests of attention, memory, language, visualmotor speed (TMT) and visualconstruction.
No difference in cognition was found between baseline and 1-month exams (means z score improvement = 0.06, p = 0.43) but cognition improved significantly between baseline and 3-month exams (mean z score improvement = 0.34, p < 0.00001). Examination of individual test scores found, after correction for multiple comparisons, only the TMT variable was significantly different at the 3-month exam.
We found significantly improved cognition 3 months after LVAD surgery in a subset of patients without post-surgical stroke. The reasons for the lack of cognitive improvement at the 1-month post-surgical assessment may include ongoing medical and physiological disruptions in the immediate post-operative period. Further research into the sources of delayed improvement is warranted. Cognitive assessments performed immediately after surgery should be interpreted with caution because the results may not reflect longer term cognitive outcomes. LVAD patients may require additional support to successfully manage their health in the weeks immediately following surgery but assistance needs may decrease over time.
左心室辅助装置(LVAD)手术后认知功能的研究结果不一。为了探究LVAD手术后认知功能是会改善、下降还是保持稳定,我们对LVAD手术前、术后1个月和3个月的认知功能进行了检查。排除了术后中风的患者。
28名受试者(平均年龄=54.31±12岁)构成了来自DuraHeart LVAS设备试验的一个观察性病例系列。在基线、术后1个月和3个月进行认知测试,测试包括注意力、记忆力、语言能力、视觉运动速度(TMT)和视觉构建能力的测试。
基线检查和1个月检查之间的认知功能没有差异(平均z评分改善=0.06,p=0.43),但基线检查和3个月检查之间的认知功能有显著改善(平均z评分改善=0.34,p<0.00001)。对个体测试分数进行检查发现,在进行多重比较校正后,只有TMT变量在3个月检查时存在显著差异。
我们发现,在没有术后中风的部分患者中,LVAD手术后三个月认知功能有显著改善。术后1个月评估时认知功能缺乏改善的原因可能包括术后早期持续存在的医学和生理紊乱。有必要对延迟改善的原因进行进一步研究。手术后立即进行的认知评估结果应谨慎解读,因为这些结果可能无法反映长期认知结果。LVAD患者在术后几周可能需要额外的支持来成功管理自身健康,但随着时间推移,援助需求可能会减少。