• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

接受连续流与搏动流左心室辅助装置支持的终末期心力衰竭患者的神经认知功能。

Neurocognitive function in destination therapy patients receiving continuous-flow vs pulsatile-flow left ventricular assist device support.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19102, USA.

出版信息

J Heart Lung Transplant. 2012 Jan;31(1):27-36. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2011.10.012.

DOI:10.1016/j.healun.2011.10.012
PMID:22153550
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The HeartMate II (Thoratec Corp, Pleasanton, CA) continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (LVAD) improved survival in destination therapy (DT) patients during a randomized trial compared with pulsatile-flow LVADs. This study documented changes in cognitive performance in DT patients from that trial to determine if there were differences between continuous-flow and pulsatile-flow support.

METHODS

Data were collected in a sub-study from 96 HeartMate II continuous-flow and 30 HeartMate XVE pulsatile-flow LVAD patients from 12 of the 35 trial sites that followed the same serial neurocognitive (NC) testing protocol at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after LVAD implantation. Spatial perception, memory, language, executive functions, and processing speed were the domains assessed with 10 standard cognitive measures. Differences over time and between LVAD type were evaluated with linear mixed-effects modeling.

RESULTS

From 1 to 24 months after LVAD implantation, changes in NC functions were stable or showed improvement in all domains, and there were no differences between the continuous-flow and pulsatile-flow groups. Data at 24 months were only available from patients with the continuous-flow LVAD due to the limited durability of the HeartMate XVE device. There was no decline in any NC domain over the time of LVAD support. Missing data not collected from patients who died could have resulted in a bias toward inflated study results.

CONCLUSIONS

The NC performance of advanced heart failure patients supported with continuous-flow and pulsatile-flow LVADs shows stabilization or improvement during support for up to 24 months.

摘要

背景

在一项随机试验中,与脉动流左心室辅助装置(LVAD)相比,Thoratec 公司的 HeartMate II 连续流 LVAD 提高了终末期心力衰竭患者的生存率。本研究记录了该试验中 DT 患者认知功能的变化,以确定连续流和脉动流支持之间是否存在差异。

方法

该研究从该试验的 35 个试验点中的 12 个收集了来自 96 例 HeartMate II 连续流和 30 例 HeartMate XVE 脉动流 LVAD 患者的数据,这些患者在 LVAD 植入后 1、3、6、12 和 24 个月遵循相同的连续神经认知(NC)测试方案进行了测试。空间感知、记忆、语言、执行功能和处理速度是通过 10 项标准认知测试来评估的。使用线性混合效应模型评估随时间的变化和 LVAD 类型之间的差异。

结果

从 LVAD 植入后 1 到 24 个月,NC 功能的变化在所有领域都保持稳定或有所改善,并且在连续流和脉动流组之间没有差异。由于 HeartMate XVE 装置的耐用性有限,只有连续流 LVAD 的患者才有 24 个月的数据。在 LVAD 支持期间,没有任何 NC 领域出现下降。由于患者死亡导致未从患者那里收集到的缺失数据可能导致研究结果膨胀。

结论

在长达 24 个月的时间内,使用连续流和脉动流 LVAD 支持的晚期心力衰竭患者的 NC 表现显示出稳定或改善。

相似文献

1
Neurocognitive function in destination therapy patients receiving continuous-flow vs pulsatile-flow left ventricular assist device support.接受连续流与搏动流左心室辅助装置支持的终末期心力衰竭患者的神经认知功能。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2012 Jan;31(1):27-36. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2011.10.012.
2
Post-cardiac transplant survival after support with a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device: impact of duration of left ventricular assist device support and other variables.心脏移植后使用持续血流左心室辅助装置的生存情况:左心室辅助装置支持时间和其他变量的影响。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010 Jul;140(1):174-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.03.037. Epub 2010 May 5.
3
Neurocognitive assessments in advanced heart failure patients receiving continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices.接受连续流左心室辅助装置的晚期心力衰竭患者的神经认知评估
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2009 Jun;28(6):542-9. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2009.02.007.
4
Effects of centrifugal, axial, and pulsatile left ventricular assist device support on end-organ function in heart failure patients.离心式、轴流式和搏动式左心室辅助装置支持对心力衰竭患者终末器官功能的影响。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2009 Apr;28(4):352-9. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2009.01.005.
5
Effects of pulsatile- and continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices on left ventricular unloading.搏动流和连续流左心室辅助装置对左心室卸载的影响。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2008 Mar;27(3):261-7. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2007.12.001.
6
Long-term continuous flow left ventricular assist device support and end-organ function: prospects for destination therapy.长期持续血流左心室辅助装置支持与终末器官功能:目标治疗的前景
J Card Surg. 2010 Jul;25(4):490-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8191.2010.01075.x.
7
End-organ function in patients on long-term circulatory support with continuous- or pulsatile-flow assist devices.使用连续流或搏动流辅助装置进行长期循环支持的患者的终末器官功能。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2007 Aug;26(8):815-8. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2007.05.012. Epub 2007 Jul 6.
8
Does continuous flow left ventricular assist device technology have a positive impact on outcome pretransplant and posttransplant?持续血流左心室辅助装置技术对移植前和移植后的结果有积极影响吗?
Ann Thorac Surg. 2006 Nov;82(5):1774-8. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.05.079.
9
Improved survival and decreasing incidence of adverse events with the HeartMate II left ventricular assist device as bridge-to-transplant therapy.使用HeartMate II左心室辅助装置作为桥接至移植治疗可提高生存率并降低不良事件发生率。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2008 Oct;86(4):1227-34; discussion 1234-5. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.06.030.
10
Risk assessment for continuous flow left ventricular assist devices: does the destination therapy risk score work? An analysis of over 1,000 patients.连续流动左心室辅助装置的风险评估:目标治疗风险评分是否有效?对超过 1000 名患者的分析。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Jul 3;60(1):44-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.02.032. Epub 2012 Apr 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Physiologic effects of different hemodynamic patterns of LVAD.左心室辅助装置不同血流动力学模式的生理效应
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025 Aug 4;12:1645705. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1645705. eCollection 2025.
2
Long-term cognitive outcomes after surgery and anesthesia: what we find depends on where we look.手术和麻醉后的长期认知结果:我们的发现取决于观察的角度。
Curr Anesthesiol Rep. 2024 Mar;14(1):8-14. doi: 10.1007/s40140-023-00590-0. Epub 2023 Dec 20.
3
A Computational Investigation of the Effects of Temporal Synchronization of Left Ventricular Assist Device Speed Modulation with the Cardiac Cycle on Intraventricular Hemodynamics.
左心室辅助装置速度调制与心动周期时间同步对室内血液动力学影响的计算研究。
Ann Biomed Eng. 2024 Jun;52(6):1763-1778. doi: 10.1007/s10439-024-03489-x. Epub 2024 Mar 22.
4
Premature Cardiovascular Disease and Brain Health in Midlife: The CARDIA Study.中年时期的心血管疾病与大脑健康:CARDIA 研究。
Neurology. 2023 Apr 4;100(14):e1454-e1463. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000206825. Epub 2023 Jan 25.
5
Cognitive Dysfunction after Heart Disease: A Manifestation of the Heart-Brain Axis.心脏病后的认知功能障碍:心脑轴的表现。
Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2021 Aug 18;2021:4899688. doi: 10.1155/2021/4899688. eCollection 2021.
6
Neuropsychological Assessment and Screening in Heart Failure: a Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.心力衰竭的神经心理学评估和筛查:荟萃分析和系统评价。
Neuropsychol Rev. 2021 Jun;31(2):312-330. doi: 10.1007/s11065-020-09463-3. Epub 2021 Jan 11.
7
NT-proBNP and Risk of Dementia in a General Japanese Elderly Population: The Hisayama Study.NT-proBNP 与日本一般老年人群痴呆风险:久山研究。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Sep 3;8(17):e011652. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.011652. Epub 2019 Aug 24.
8
Does cognition improve following LVAD implantation?植入左心室辅助装置(LVAD)后认知功能会改善吗?
Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Aug;66(8):456-463. doi: 10.1007/s11748-018-0947-5. Epub 2018 May 23.
9
Left Ventricular Assist Devices for Destination Therapy: A Health Technology Assessment.用于终末期治疗的左心室辅助装置:一项卫生技术评估
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2016 Feb 8;16(3):1-60. eCollection 2016.
10
Incidence and predictors of cognitive decline in patients with left ventricular assist devices.左心室辅助装置患者认知功能下降的发生率及预测因素
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2015 May;8(3):285-91. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.115.001856. Epub 2015 Apr 29.