• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

左心室辅助装置植入后 12 个月内患者间和患者内健康状况变化的预测因素。

Predictors of changes in health status between and within patients 12 months post left ventricular assist device implantation.

机构信息

CoRPS - Centre of Research on Psychology in Somatic diseases, Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur J Heart Fail. 2014 May;16(5):566-73. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.75. Epub 2014 Mar 11.

DOI:10.1002/ejhf.75
PMID:24619799
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Improving patient-reported outcomes (e.g. health status) has become an important goal in left ventricular assist device (LVAD) therapy, in addition to reducing mortality and morbidity. We examined predictors of changes in health status scores between and within patients 12 months post LVAD implantation.

METHODS

Health status [Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ); Short-Form 12 (SF-12)] were assessed at 3-4 weeks after implantation, and at 3, 6 and 12 months follow up in 54 LVAD patients (74% men; mean age 54 ± 9 years).

RESULTS

Patients experienced significant improvements in health status between baseline and 3 months follow-up as assessed by the KCCQ (clinical summary score: F = 33.49, P < 0.001; overall summary score: F = 31.13, P < 0.001) and the SF-12 (physical component score: F = 31.59, P < 0.001; mental component score: F = 21.77, P < 0.001), but not between 3 months and 12 months follow-up (P > 0.05 for all). Higher scores on anxiety and depression over time, older age, lower ejection fraction, and more co-morbidity were associated with poorer health status scores on one or both of the KCCQ and SF-12 subscales. The majority of the between-patient variance of the mental component summary scores (82.6%), but not the KCCQ overall summary score (41.9%), KCCQ clinical summary score (36.2%) and physical component summary scores (23.2%), was explained by the sociodemographic, clinical and psychological factors.

CONCLUSION

The majority of LVAD patients show a significant improvement in health status after LVAD implantation. However, there are large differences in individual health status score trajectories which are only partly explained by measures of disease severity pre-LVAD, co-morbidity and psychological stress.

摘要

背景

除了降低死亡率和发病率外,改善患者报告的结果(例如健康状况)已成为左心室辅助装置(LVAD)治疗的重要目标。我们研究了 LVAD 植入后 12 个月内患者之间和患者内健康状况评分变化的预测因素。

方法

在植入后 3-4 周以及 3、6 和 12 个月的随访中,评估了 54 名 LVAD 患者(74%为男性;平均年龄 54±9 岁)的健康状况[堪萨斯城心肌病问卷(KCCQ);简短形式 12(SF-12)]。

结果

患者在基线和 3 个月随访之间的健康状况得到了显著改善,这可以通过 KCCQ(临床总结评分:F=33.49,P<0.001;总总结评分:F=31.13,P<0.001)和 SF-12(身体成分评分:F=31.59,P<0.001;精神成分评分:F=21.77,P<0.001)来评估,但在 3 个月和 12 个月随访之间没有差异(P>0.05)。焦虑和抑郁评分随时间的升高、年龄较大、射血分数较低以及合并症较多与 KCCQ 和 SF-12 子量表之一或两者的健康状况评分较差相关。心理因素。

结论

大多数 LVAD 患者在 LVAD 植入后健康状况有显著改善。然而,个体健康状况评分轨迹存在较大差异,而这些差异仅部分可以通过 LVAD 前疾病严重程度、合并症和心理压力的测量来解释。

相似文献

1
Predictors of changes in health status between and within patients 12 months post left ventricular assist device implantation.左心室辅助装置植入后 12 个月内患者间和患者内健康状况变化的预测因素。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2014 May;16(5):566-73. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.75. Epub 2014 Mar 11.
2
Changes in disease-specific versus generic health status measures after left ventricular assist device implantation: Insights from INTERMACS.左心室辅助装置植入后疾病特异性与通用健康状况测量的变化:来自 INTERMACS 的见解。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2017 Nov;36(11):1243-1249. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2017.05.023. Epub 2017 May 20.
3
Association of global and disease-specific health status with outcomes following continuous-flow left ventricular assist device implantation.全球及特定疾病健康状况与连续血流左心室辅助装置植入术后结局的关联。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2017 Mar 14;17(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12872-017-0510-9.
4
Quality of Life and Influential Factors in Patients Implanted With a Left Ventricular Assist Device.植入左心室辅助装置患者的生活质量及影响因素
Circ J. 2015;79(10):2186-92. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-15-0502. Epub 2015 Aug 10.
5
Quality of life and emotional distress early after left ventricular assist device implant: a mixed-method study.左心室辅助装置植入术后早期的生活质量和情绪困扰:一项混合方法研究。
Artif Organs. 2015 Mar;39(3):220-7. doi: 10.1111/aor.12362. Epub 2014 Sep 10.
6
Evaluation of changes in quality of life among Turkish patients undergoing ventricular assist device implantation.对接受心室辅助装置植入的土耳其患者生活质量变化的评估。
Transplant Proc. 2012 Jul-Aug;44(6):1735-7. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2012.05.031.
7
Factors Associated With Health-Related Quality of Life 2 Years After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation: Insights From INTERMACS.植入左心室辅助装置 2 年后与健康相关的生活质量相关因素:来自 INTERMACS 的见解。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Jul 20;10(14):e021196. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.021196. Epub 2021 Jul 9.
8
Continuous flow left ventricular assist device improves functional capacity and quality of life of advanced heart failure patients.连续流动左心室辅助装置可改善晚期心力衰竭患者的功能能力和生活质量。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Apr 27;55(17):1826-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.12.052.
9
Impact of Spironolactone on Longitudinal Changes in Health-Related Quality of Life in the Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure With an Aldosterone Antagonist Trial.螺内酯对醛固酮拮抗剂试验治疗射血分数保留的心力衰竭患者健康相关生活质量纵向变化的影响
Circ Heart Fail. 2016 Mar;9(3):e001937. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.114.001937.
10
Quality of life of advanced chronic heart failure: medical care, mechanical circulatory support and transplantation.晚期慢性心力衰竭的生活质量:医疗护理、机械循环支持与移植
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016 Aug;50(2):269-73. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezw054. Epub 2016 Apr 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk prediction model for waitlist mortality in patients with left ventricular assist devices.左心室辅助装置患者等待名单死亡率的风险预测模型
JHLT Open. 2025 Jul 19;10:100337. doi: 10.1016/j.jhlto.2025.100337. eCollection 2025 Nov.
2
Assessing stress in LVAD recipients: Development of the LVAD Stress Questionnaire.评估左心室辅助装置(LVAD)接受者的压力:LVAD压力问卷的编制
Int J Artif Organs. 2025 Jun;48(6):393-398. doi: 10.1177/03913988251337881. Epub 2025 May 30.
3
Validity and reliability of the left ventricular assist device self-care behaviour scale.
左心室辅助装置自我护理行为量表的有效性和可靠性。
PLoS One. 2023 Feb 10;18(2):e0275465. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275465. eCollection 2023.
4
Psychological Spectrum Experienced by Heart Failure Patients After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation.左心室辅助装置植入后心力衰竭患者所经历的心理谱
Cureus. 2020 Aug 11;12(8):e9671. doi: 10.7759/cureus.9671.
5
The role of long-term mechanical circulatory support in patients with advanced heart failure.长期机械循环支持在晚期心力衰竭患者中的作用。
Neth Heart J. 2020 Aug;28(Suppl 1):115-121. doi: 10.1007/s12471-020-01449-3.
6
Thirty years of heart transplantation at the University Medical Centre Utrecht.乌得勒支大学医学中心的三十年心脏移植历程。
Neth Heart J. 2017 Sep;25(9):516-523. doi: 10.1007/s12471-017-0969-0.
7
Global Outcome in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Devices.左心室辅助装置患者的全球结局
Am J Cardiol. 2017 Apr 1;119(7):1069-1073. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.12.014. Epub 2017 Jan 5.
8
Psychocardiology in the elderly.老年心理心脏病学
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2016 Dec;128(Suppl 7):474-479. doi: 10.1007/s00508-016-1139-x. Epub 2016 Nov 28.
9
Frequency of Poor Outcome (Death or Poor Quality of Life) After Left Ventricular Assist Device for Destination Therapy: Results From the INTERMACS Registry.用于终末期治疗的左心室辅助装置植入术后不良结局(死亡或生活质量差)的发生率:来自INTERMACS注册研究的结果
Circ Heart Fail. 2016 Aug;9(8). doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.115.002800.
10
Pain and Functional Status in Patients With Ventricular Assist Devices.使用心室辅助装置患者的疼痛与功能状态
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2016 Oct;52(4):483-490.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2016.05.016. Epub 2016 Jul 9.