Franik Sebastian, Eltrop Stephanie M, Kremer Jan Am, Kiesel Ludwig, Farquhar Cindy
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Münster, Germany, 48149.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 24;5(5):CD010287. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010287.pub3.
Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is the most common cause of infrequent periods (oligomenorrhoea) and absence of periods (amenorrhoea). It affects about 4% to 8% of women worldwide and often leads to anovulatory subfertility. Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are a class of drugs that were introduced for ovulation induction in 2001. Since about 2001 clinical trials have reached differing conclusions as to whether the AI letrozole is at least as effective as the first-line treatment clomiphene citrate (CC).
To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of aromatase inhibitors for subfertile women with anovulatory PCOS for ovulation induction followed by timed intercourse or intrauterine insemination (IUI).
We searched the following sources from inception to November 2017 to identify relevant randomised controlled trials (RCTs): the Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility Group Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Pubmed, LILACS, Web of Knowledge, the World Health Organization (WHO) clinical trials register and Clinicaltrials.gov. We also searched the references of relevant articles. We did not restrict the searches by language or publication status.
We included all RCTs of AIs used alone or with other medical therapies for ovulation induction in women of reproductive age with anovulatory PCOS.
Two review authors independently selected trials, extracted the data and assessed risks of bias. We pooled studies where appropriate using a fixed-effect model to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for most outcomes, and risk differences (RDs) for ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). The primary outcomes were live birth and OHSS. Secondary outcomes were clinical pregnancy, miscarriage and multiple pregnancy. We assessed the quality of the evidence for each comparison using GRADE methods.
This is a substantive update of a previous review. We identified 16 additional studies for the 2018 update. We include 42 RCTs (7935 women). The aromatase inhibitor letrozole was used in all studies.Letrozole compared to clomiphene citrate (CC) with or without adjuncts followed by timed intercourseLive birth rates were higher with letrozole (with or without adjuncts) compared to clomiphene citrate (with our without adjuncts) followed by timed intercourse (OR 1.68, 95% CI 1.42 to 1.99; 2954 participants; 13 studies; I = 0%; number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) = 10; moderate-quality evidence). There is high-quality evidence that OHSS rates are similar with letrozole or clomiphene citrate (0.5% in both arms: risk difference (RD) -0.00, 95% CI -0.01 to 0.00; 2536 participants; 12 studies; I = 0%; high-quality evidence). There is evidence for a higher pregnancy rate in favour of letrozole (OR 1.56, 95% CI 1.37 to 1.78; 4629 participants; 25 studies; I = 1%; NNTB = 10; moderate-quality evidence). There is little or no difference between treatment groups in the rate of miscarriage by pregnancy (20% with CC versus 19% with letrozole; OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.26; 1210 participants; 18 studies; I = 0%; high-quality evidence) and multiple pregnancy rate (1.7% with CC versus 1.3% with letrozole; OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.41 to 1.16; 3579 participants; 17 studies; I = 0%; high-quality evidence). However, a funnel plot showed mild asymmetry, indicating that some studies in favour of clomiphene might be missing.Letrozole compared to laparoscopic ovarian drillingThere is low-quality evidence that live birth rates are similar with letrozole or laparoscopic ovarian drilling (OR 1.38, 95% CI 0.95 to 2.02; 548 participants; 3 studies; I = 23%; low-quality evidence). There is insufficient evidence for a difference in OHSS rates (RD 0.00, 95% CI -0.01 to 0.01; 260 participants; 1 study; low-quality evidence). There is low-quality evidence that pregnancy rates are similar (OR 1.28, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.74; 774 participants; 5 studies; I = 0%; moderate-quality evidence). There is insufficient evidence for a difference in miscarriage rate by pregnancy (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.30 to 1.43; 240 participants; 5 studies; I = 0%; moderate-quality evidence), or multiple pregnancies (OR 3.00, 95% CI 0.12 to 74.90; 548 participants; 3 studies; I = 0%; low-quality evidence).Additional comparisons were made for Letrozole versus placebo, Selective oestrogen receptor modulators (SERMS) followed by intrauterine insemination (IUI), follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), Anastrozole, as well as dosage and administration protocols. There is insufficient evidence for a difference in either group of treatment due to a limited number of studies. Hence more research is necessary.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Letrozole appears to improve live birth and pregnancy rates in subfertile women with anovulatory polycystic ovary syndrome, compared to clomiphene citrate. There is high-quality evidence that OHSS rates are similar with letrozole or clomiphene citrate. There is high-quality evidence of no difference in miscarriage rates or multiple pregnancy rates. There is low-quality evidence of no difference in live birth and pregnancy rates between letrozole and laparoscopic ovarian drilling, although there were few relevant studies. For the 2018 update, we added good-quality trials, upgrading the quality of the evidence.
多囊卵巢综合征(PCOS)是月经不规律(月经过少)和闭经的最常见原因。它影响着全球约4%至8%的女性,并常常导致无排卵性不孕。芳香化酶抑制剂(AIs)是一类于2001年被用于诱导排卵的药物。自2001年左右以来,关于AI来曲唑是否至少与一线治疗药物枸橼酸氯米芬(CC)一样有效,临床试验得出了不同的结论。
评估芳香化酶抑制剂对患有无排卵性PCOS的不孕女性进行排卵诱导,随后进行定时性交或宫内人工授精(IUI)的有效性和安全性。
我们检索了从开始到2017年11月的以下来源,以识别相关的随机对照试验(RCT):Cochrane妇科和生育小组专业注册库、Cochrane对照试验中央注册库、MEDLINE、Embase、PsycINFO、Pubmed、LILACS、Web of Knowledge、世界卫生组织(WHO)临床试验注册库和Clinicaltrials.gov。我们还检索了相关文章的参考文献。我们没有对检索进行语言或出版状态的限制。
我们纳入了所有将AIs单独使用或与其他药物疗法联合用于对患有无排卵性PCOS的育龄女性进行排卵诱导的RCT。
两位综述作者独立选择试验、提取数据并评估偏倚风险。我们在适当情况下使用固定效应模型汇总研究,以计算大多数结局的比值比(OR)和95%置信区间(CI),以及卵巢过度刺激综合征(OHSS)的风险差(RD)。主要结局是活产和OHSS。次要结局是临床妊娠、流产和多胎妊娠。我们使用GRADE方法评估每个比较的证据质量。
这是对先前综述的实质性更新。我们为2018年更新识别了另外16项研究。我们纳入了42项RCT(7935名女性)。所有研究均使用了芳香化酶抑制剂来曲唑。
来曲唑与枸橼酸氯米芬(CC)比较,有或无辅助治疗,随后进行定时性交
与枸橼酸氯米芬(有或无辅助治疗)随后进行定时性交相比,来曲唑(有或无辅助治疗)的活产率更高(OR 1.68,95%CI 1.42至1.99;2954名参与者;13项研究;I² = 0%;额外获得一个有益结局所需的治疗人数(NNTB) = 10;中等质量证据)。有高质量证据表明来曲唑和枸橼酸氯米芬的OHSS发生率相似(两组均为0.5%:风险差(RD) -0.00, 95%CI -¬0.01至0.00;2536名参与者;12项研究;I² = 0%;高质量证据)。有证据表明来曲唑的妊娠率更高(OR 1.56,95%CI 1.37至1.78;4629名参与者;25项研究;I² = 1%;NNTB = 10;中等质量证据)。治疗组之间按妊娠计算的流产率几乎没有差异(CC组为20%,来曲唑组为19%;OR 0.94,95%CI 0.70至1.26;1210名参与者;18项研究;I² = 0%;高质量证据)和多胎妊娠率(CC组为1.7%,来曲唑组为1.3%;OR 0.69,95%CI 0.41至1.16;3579名参与者;17项研究;I² = 0%;高质量证据)。然而,漏斗图显示轻度不对称,表明一些支持氯米芬的研究可能缺失。
来曲唑与腹腔镜卵巢打孔术比较
有低质量证据表明来曲唑和腹腔镜卵巢打孔术的活产率相似(OR 1.38,95%CI 0.95至2.02;548名参与者;3项研究;I² = 23%;低质量证据)。OHSS发生率是否存在差异的证据不足(RD 0.00,95%CI -0.01至0.01;260名参与者;1项研究;低质量证据)。有低质量证据表明妊娠率相似(OR 1.28,95%CI 0.94至1.74;774名参与者;5项研究;I² = 0%;中等质量证据)。妊娠流产率是否存在差异的证据不足(OR 0.66,95%CI 0.30至1.43;240名参与者;5项研究;I² = 0%;中等质量证据),或多胎妊娠率是否存在差异的证据不足(OR 3.00,95%CI 0.12至74.90;548名参与者;3项研究;I² = 0%;低质量证据)。
还对来曲唑与安慰剂、选择性雌激素受体调节剂(SERMs)随后进行宫内人工授精(IUI)、促卵泡激素(FSH)、阿那曲唑以及剂量和给药方案进行了额外的比较。由于研究数量有限,两组治疗之间是否存在差异的证据不足。因此,需要更多的研究。
与枸橼酸氯米芬相比,来曲唑似乎能提高患有无排卵性多囊卵巢综合征的不孕女性的活产率和妊娠率。有高质量证据表明来曲唑和枸橼酸氯米芬的OHSS发生率相似。有高质量证据表明流产率或多胎妊娠率没有差异。来曲唑与腹腔镜卵巢打孔术的活产率和妊娠率没有差异的证据质量较低,尽管相关研究较少。对于2018年更新,我们增加了高质量试验,提升了证据质量。