McAuliffe Una, Kinirons Martin, Woods Noel, Harding Mairead
J Ir Dent Assoc. 2017 Feb;63(1):38-44.
Internationally, a considerable proportion of children aged five years and younger require extraction of teeth due to dental caries and frequently dental general anaesthesia (DGA) is the treatment of choice.
To investigate the records of a cohort of preschool children (aged five years and younger) referred to the public dental service provided at Cork University Hospital (CUH), Cork, Ireland, for extractions under DGA between the years 2000 and 2002. To determine the characteristics of the sample: disadvantage; the presence of a significant medical history; and, fluoride status. To establish the pattern of appointments and care, before, during and after DGA, and the pattern of dental treatment required up to sixth class (aged 11 to 12 years).
A retrospective review of dental records of a cohort of preschool-aged children referred for DGA in CUH during the years 2000-2002 was completed. Demographic and clinical data were collated and analysed using Statistical Packages for Social Sciences (SPSS). Costs were provided by CUH and the Health Service Executive (HSE). Data on costs relating to preventive programmes were obtained from information presented in the Irish Oral Health Services Guideline Initiative 2009.
A total of 347 children were included with a median age of.fQur years and a range of one to five years. Children with a disadvantage were more likely to require extractions under DGA than their- counterparts (50%, n=175). In total, 73% (n=253)~ of patients had a fluoridated water supply and 91% (n=316) had no adverse medical history. For 88% (n=306), their first dental visit was an emergency appointment. The primary indication for DGA was treatment of dental caries. A recall appointment was provided for 18% (n=63). One-quarter (n=86) required an extraction, antibiotic or referral for a second DGA at their first visit following DGA. In first class, referral for a second DGA or extraction under local anaesthetic (LA) was required for 23% (n=79) of patients. Over 60% (n=21 1) required either an extraction or a restoration in third class. In excess of 20% (n=69) of patients did not attend the sixth class dental inspection, the final assessment appointment in the public services.
A considerable number of preschool children require extractions under DGA due to dental caries. The results of this study indicate that such children progress to adolescence with poor oral health, as evidenced by the need for further restorations, extractions and repeat DGA. The average cost of DGA was E819 per child. This figure has been shown to be as much as eight times the cost of a preventive/oral health promotion prograrnme operating within a similar cohort. An integrated preventive programme targeting preschool-aged children should be considered in attempting to manage the hicih levels of dental caries within this age group.
在国际上,相当大比例的五岁及以下儿童因龋齿需要拔牙,而牙科全身麻醉(DGA)通常是首选治疗方法。
调查2000年至2002年间转诊至爱尔兰科克大学医院(CUH)公共牙科服务部门接受DGA拔牙治疗的一组学龄前儿童(五岁及以下)的记录。确定样本的特征:不利条件;是否存在重大病史;以及氟化物状况。确定DGA治疗前、治疗期间和治疗后的预约和护理模式,以及直至六年级(11至12岁)所需的牙科治疗模式。
对2000 - 2002年间转诊至CUH接受DGA治疗的一组学龄前儿童的牙科记录进行回顾性研究。使用社会科学统计软件包(SPSS)整理和分析人口统计学和临床数据。费用由CUH和卫生服务执行局(HSE)提供。与预防项目相关的费用数据来自2009年爱尔兰口腔健康服务指南倡议中提供的信息。
共纳入347名儿童,中位年龄为四岁,年龄范围为一岁至五岁。处于不利条件的儿童比其他儿童更有可能需要接受DGA拔牙治疗(50%,n = 175)。总体而言,73%(n = 253)的患者有氟化水供应,91%(n = 316)没有不良病史。88%(n = 306)的儿童首次看牙是急诊预约。DGA的主要指征是治疗龋齿。18%(n = 63)的儿童获得了复诊预约。四分之一(n = 86)的儿童在DGA后的首次就诊时需要拔牙、使用抗生素或转诊接受第二次DGA治疗。在一年级时,23%(n = 79)的患者需要转诊接受第二次DGA治疗或在局部麻醉(LA)下拔牙。超过60%(n = 211)的儿童在三年级时需要拔牙或补牙。超过20%(n = 69)的患者未参加六年级的牙科检查,这是公共服务中的最后一次评估预约。
相当数量的学龄前儿童因龋齿需要接受DGA拔牙治疗。本研究结果表明,这些儿童进入青春期时口腔健康状况较差,这从需要进一步补牙、拔牙和重复DGA治疗中可见一斑。DGA的平均费用为每名儿童819欧元。这一数字已被证明高达在类似队列中开展的预防/口腔健康促进项目费用的八倍。在试图管理该年龄组较高的龋齿水平时,应考虑针对学龄前儿童的综合预防项目。