School of Dentistry, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
College of Medicine and Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
JDR Clin Trans Res. 2023 Jul;8(3):267-275. doi: 10.1177/23800844221088833. Epub 2022 Apr 11.
Tooth extraction under general anesthetic (GA) is a global health problem. It is expensive, high risk, and resource intensive, and its prevalence and burden should be reduced where possible. Recent innovation in data analysis techniques now makes it possible to assess the impact of GA policy decisions on public health outcomes. This article describes results from one such technique called process mining, which was applied to dental electronic health record (EHR) data. Treatment pathways preceding extractions under general anesthetic were mined to yield useful insights into waiting times, number of dental visits, treatments, and prescribing behaviors associated with this undesirable outcome.
Anonymized data were extracted from a dental EHR covering a population of 231,760 patients aged 0 to 16 y, treated in the Irish public health care system between 2000 and 2014. The data were profiled, assessed for quality, and preprocessed in preparation for analysis. Existing process mining methods were adapted to execute process mining in the context of assessing dental EHR data.
Process models of dental treatment preceding extractions under general anesthetic were generated from the EHR data using process mining tools. A total of 5,563 patients who had 26,115 GA were identified. Of these, 9% received a tooth dressing before extraction with an average lag time of 6 mo between dressing and extraction. In total, 11,867 emergency appointments were attended by the cohort with 2,668 X-rays, 4,370 prescriptions, and over 800 restorations and other treatments carried out prior to tooth extraction.
Process models generated useful insights, identifying metrics and issues around extractions under general anesthetic and revealing the complexity of dental treatment pathways. The pathways showed high levels of emergency appointments, prescriptions, and additional tooth restorations ultimately unsuccessful in preventing extractions. Supporting earlier publications, the study suggested earlier screening, preventive initiatives, guideline development, and alternative treatments deserve consideration.
This study generates insights into tooth extractions under general anesthetic using process mining technologies and methods, revealing levels of extraction and associated high levels of prescriptions, emergency appointments, and restorative treatments. These insights can inform dental planners assessing policy decisions for tooth extractions under general anesthetic. The methods used can be combined with costs and patient outcomes to contribute to more effective decision-making.
全身麻醉下拔牙是一个全球性的健康问题。它既昂贵、风险高、资源密集,又尽可能地减少其普遍性和负担。数据分析技术的最新创新现在使得评估全身麻醉政策决策对公共卫生结果的影响成为可能。本文介绍了一种名为流程挖掘的技术的结果,该技术应用于牙科电子健康记录 (EHR) 数据。通过挖掘全身麻醉下拔牙前的治疗途径,得出了与这一不良结果相关的等待时间、就诊次数、治疗和处方行为的有用见解。
从 2000 年至 2014 年期间在爱尔兰公共医疗保健系统中接受治疗的 231760 名 0 至 16 岁患者的匿名牙科 EHR 中提取数据。对数据进行了分析,评估了数据质量,并进行了预处理,为分析做准备。现有的流程挖掘方法被改编以在评估牙科 EHR 数据的背景下执行流程挖掘。
使用流程挖掘工具从 EHR 数据中生成了全身麻醉下拔牙前的牙科治疗流程模型。从 EHR 数据中总共确定了 5563 名接受全身麻醉拔牙的患者,其中 9%在拔牙前接受了牙填料治疗,平均在填料和拔牙之间有 6 个月的时间差。总共,该队列中有 11867 次急诊预约,进行了 2668 次 X 光检查,4370 次处方,以及在拔牙前进行了 800 多次修复和其他治疗。
生成的流程模型提供了有用的见解,确定了全身麻醉下拔牙的指标和问题,并揭示了牙科治疗途径的复杂性。这些途径显示出急诊预约、处方和其他牙齿修复的高水平,最终未能预防拔牙。与之前的出版物一致,该研究表明,早期筛查、预防措施、指南制定和替代治疗值得考虑。
本研究使用流程挖掘技术和方法生成了关于全身麻醉下拔牙的见解,揭示了拔牙的水平以及相关的高处方、急诊预约和修复治疗水平。这些见解可以为评估全身麻醉下拔牙政策决策的牙科规划者提供信息。使用的方法可以与成本和患者结果相结合,以促进更有效的决策。