Suppr超能文献

从卵裂球活检到滋养外胚层活检的转变:比较两种非整倍体植入前基因检测策略

Transition from blastomere to trophectoderm biopsy: comparing two preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies strategies.

作者信息

Coll Lluc, Parriego Mònica, Boada Montserrat, Devesa Marta, Arroyo Gemma, Rodríguez Ignacio, Coroleu Bonaventura, Vidal Francesca, Veiga Anna

机构信息

Gran Via Carles III,71-75.08028 Barcelona,Spain.

Reproductive Medicine Service,Department of Obstetrics,Gynaecology and Reproduction,Hospital Universitari Dexeus - Dexeus Women's Health. Gran Via Carles III,71-75,08028 Barcelona,Spain.

出版信息

Zygote. 2018 Jun;26(3):191-198. doi: 10.1017/S0967199418000084. Epub 2018 May 25.

Abstract

SummaryShortly after the implementation of comprehensive chromosome screening (CCS) techniques for preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A), the discussion about the transition from day 3 to blastocyst stage biopsy was initiated. Trophectoderm biopsy with CCS is meant to overcome the limitations of cleavage-stage biopsy and single-cell analysis. The aim of this study was to assess the results obtained in our PGT-A programme after the implementation of this new strategy. Comparisons between the results obtained in 179 PGT-A cycles with day 3 biopsy (D+3) and fresh embryo transfer, and 204 cycles with trophectoderm biopsy and deferred (frozen-thawed) embryo transfer were established. Fewer embryos were biopsied and a higher euploidy rate was observed in the trophectoderm biopsy group. No differences in implantation (50.3% vs. 61.4%) and clinical pregnancy rate per transfer (56.1% vs. 65.3%) were found. Although the mean number of euploid embryos per cycle did not differ between groups (1.5 ± 1.7 vs. 1.7 ± 1.8), the final number of euploid blastocysts available for transfer per cycle was significantly higher in the trophectoderm biopsy group (1.1 ± 1.3 vs. 1.7 ± 1.8). This factor led to an increased cumulative live birth rate in this last group (34.1% vs. 44.6%). Although both strategies can offer good results, trophectoderm biopsy offers a more robust diagnosis and the intervention is less harmful for the embryos so more euploid blastocysts are finally available for transfer and/or vitrification.

摘要

摘要

在实施用于非整倍体植入前基因检测(PGT-A)的全面染色体筛查(CCS)技术后不久,关于从第3天胚胎活检向囊胚期活检转变的讨论就开始了。采用CCS的滋养外胚层活检旨在克服卵裂期活检和单细胞分析的局限性。本研究的目的是评估在我们的PGT-A项目中实施这一新策略后所获得的结果。对179个采用第3天胚胎活检(D+3)和新鲜胚胎移植的PGT-A周期,与204个采用滋养外胚层活检和延期(冻融)胚胎移植的周期所获得的结果进行了比较。滋养外胚层活检组活检的胚胎较少,且观察到更高的整倍体率。在植入率(50.3%对61.4%)和每次移植的临床妊娠率(56.1%对65.3%)方面未发现差异。虽然每组每个周期的整倍体胚胎平均数无差异(1.5±1.7对1.7±1.8),但滋养外胚层活检组每个周期可用于移植的最终整倍体囊胚数显著更高(1.1±1.3对1.7±1.8)。这一因素导致后一组的累积活产率增加(34.1%对44.6%)。虽然两种策略都能取得良好结果,但滋养外胚层活检能提供更可靠的诊断,且对胚胎的干预危害较小,因此最终有更多的整倍体囊胚可用于移植和/或玻璃化冷冻。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验