• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
AMCP Partnership Forum: Driving Value and Outcomes in Oncology.AMCP 合作论坛:推动肿瘤学的价值和成果。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2018 Jun;24(6):572-578. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2018.24.6.572.
2
AMCP Partnership Forum: Advancing Value-Based Contracting.AMCP 合作论坛:推进基于价值的合同。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2017 Nov;23(11):1096-1102. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2017.17342. Epub 2017 Oct 16.
3
AMCP Partnership Forum: Designing Benefits and Payment Models for Innovative High-Investment Medications.AMCP 合作论坛:为创新性高投入药物设计获益和支付模式。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2019 Feb;25(2):156-162. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2019.25.2.156.
4
AMCP Partnership Forum: Driving Value and Outcomes in Oncology.AMCP 合作论坛:推动肿瘤学的价值和成果。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2017 May;23(5):591-597. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2017.23.5.591.
5
AMCP Partnership Forum: Integrated Delivery Networks' Role in Pharmaceutical Value-Based Agreements.AMCP 合作论坛:整合交付网络在药品价值型协议中的作用。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2019 May;25(5):526-531. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2019.25.5.526.
6
AMCP Partnership Forum: FDAMA Section 114-Improving the Exchange of Health Care Economic Data.AMCP 合作论坛:FDAMA 第 114 节——改善医疗保健经济数据的交流。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2016 Jul;22(7):826-31. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2016.22.7.826.
7
AMCP Partnership Forum: Digital Therapeutics-What Are They and Where Do They Fit in Pharmacy and Medical Benefits?AMCP 合作论坛:数字疗法——它们是什么,以及它们在药学和医疗福利中的定位是什么?
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2020 May;26(5):674-681. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2020.19418. Epub 2020 Mar 16.
8
AMCP Partnership Forum: Enabling the Exchange of Clinical and Economic Information Pre-FDA Approval.AMCP 合作论坛:在 FDA 批准前实现临床和经济信息的交流。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2017 Jan;23(1):105-112. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2016.16366. Epub 2016 Dec 22.
9
AMCP Partnership Forum: Optimizing Prior Authorization for Appropriate Medication Selection.AMCP 合作论坛:优化适当药物选择的预先授权。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2020 Jan;26(1):55-62. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2020.26.1.55.
10
AMCP Partnership Forum: Building the Foundation for Patient-Reported Outcomes-Infrastructure and Methodologies.AMCP合作论坛:构建患者报告结局的基础设施与方法基础
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2019 Apr;25(4):501-506. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2019.19034. Epub 2019 Mar 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Financial Toxicity: Management as an Adverse Effect of Cancer Treatment
.财务毒性:作为癌症治疗不良反应的管理
Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2017 Dec 1;21(6):762-764. doi: 10.1188/17.CJON.762-764.
2
Out-of-Pocket and Health Care Spending Changes for Patients Using Orally Administered Anticancer Therapy After Adoption of State Parity Laws.州平价法实施后口服抗癌治疗患者自付费用和医疗支出变化。
JAMA Oncol. 2018 Jun 14;4(6):e173598. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.3598.
3
AMCP Partnership Forum: Advancing Value-Based Contracting.AMCP 合作论坛:推进基于价值的合同。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2017 Nov;23(11):1096-1102. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2017.17342. Epub 2017 Oct 16.
4
A Systematic Review of Financial Toxicity Among Cancer Survivors: We Can't Pay the Co-Pay.癌症幸存者财务毒性的系统评价:我们付不起自付费用。
Patient. 2017 Jun;10(3):295-309. doi: 10.1007/s40271-016-0204-x.
5
Value, Access, and Cost of Cancer Care Delivery at Academic Cancer Centers.学术癌症中心的癌症护理提供的价值、可及性和成本。
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2016 Jul;14(7):837-47. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2016.0088.
6
Do medical oncologists and cancer patients care about treatment costs of systemic anticancer therapy?肿瘤内科医生和癌症患者关心全身抗癌治疗的费用吗?
J BUON. 2015 Nov-Dec;20(6):1606-11.
7
Medical oncologists' views on communicating with patients about chemotherapy costs: a pilot survey.肿瘤内科医生关于与患者沟通化疗费用的观点:一项初步调查。
J Clin Oncol. 2007 Jan 10;25(2):233-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.09.2437.

AMCP 合作论坛:推动肿瘤学的价值和成果。

AMCP Partnership Forum: Driving Value and Outcomes in Oncology.

出版信息

J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2018 Jun;24(6):572-578. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2018.24.6.572.

DOI:10.18553/jmcp.2018.24.6.572
PMID:29799323
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10398017/
Abstract

UNLABELLED

Cancer is one of the most costly medical conditions to treat in the United States due in part to increasingly innovative, but expensive, chemotherapeutic, immuno-oncologic, and biologic treatments. At the same time, health insurance in the United States is increasingly shifting a larger part of the costs to patients through higher premiums, deductibles, and coinsurance and copayment rates. These shifts are driving the need for quality measures and value measurements in oncology that assess the total effect on care and can be used to develop payment models. Measures that consider the patient's experience are emerging as important factors for evaluating value in cancer care. To address these issues, the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy (AMCP) convened a stakeholder forum, Driving Value and Outcomes in Oncology, on November 14-15, 2017, in Arlington, Virginia. The goals of the forum were to (a) understand which oncology-specific quality measures are important for managed care decision makers; (b) prioritize the gaps related to the use of pharmaceuticals in measuring oncology outcomes; (c) develop a list of recommendations for how a collaboration of payers, providers, and AMCP may drive improvements in oncology care; and (d) define solutions for addressing causes of patient financial burdens for cancer care. More than 30 national and regional health care leaders representing health plans, integrated delivery systems, pharmacy benefit managers, pharmacists, employers, patient advocates, national professional associations, and biopharmaceutical companies participated in the forum.

DISCLOSURES

This AMCP Partnership Forum and the development of this proceedings report were supported in collaboration with Abbvie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Foundation Medicine, Genentech, Gilead, Eli Lilly, Merck, Sanofi, Takeda Oncology, and Xcenda.

摘要

未加标签

在美国,癌症是治疗费用最高的医疗条件之一,部分原因是化疗、免疫肿瘤学和生物治疗越来越创新,但费用也越来越高。与此同时,美国的健康保险通过提高保费、免赔额、自付额和共付额,将越来越多的成本转嫁给患者。这些转变推动了肿瘤学领域需要进行质量措施和价值测量,以评估对护理的总体影响,并可用于开发支付模式。考虑患者体验的措施正在成为评估癌症护理价值的重要因素。为了解决这些问题,管理式医疗药剂师协会(AMCP)于 2017 年 11 月 14 日至 15 日在弗吉尼亚州阿灵顿召开了一次利益攸关方论坛,题为“推动肿瘤学的价值和结果”。该论坛的目标是:(a)了解对管理式医疗决策者而言,哪些特定于肿瘤学的质量措施很重要;(b)确定与使用药品衡量肿瘤学结果相关的差距;(c)制定关于支付方、服务提供方和 AMCP 如何合作改善肿瘤学护理的建议清单;(d)确定解决癌症护理患者经济负担的方法。超过 30 名代表健康计划、综合交付系统、药品福利管理公司、药剂师、雇主、患者权益维护者、国家专业协会和生物制药公司的全国和地区卫生保健领导人参加了该论坛。

披露

此次 AMCP 合作论坛及其相关报告的编写工作得到了 Abbvie、Amgen、AstraZeneca、Foundation Medicine、Genentech、Gilead、Eli Lilly、Merck、Sanofi、Takeda Oncology 和 Xcenda 的支持与合作。