• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Risk of Venous Thromboembolism in Patients With Keratinocyte Carcinoma.角化细胞癌患者的静脉血栓栓塞风险。
JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2018 Dec 1;20(6):453-459. doi: 10.1001/jamafacial.2018.0331.
2
Incremental Health Care Burden of Bleeding Among Patients with Venous Thromboembolism in the United States.美国静脉血栓栓塞症患者出血的增量医疗负担。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2015 Oct;21(10):965-72. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2015.21.10.965.
3
High Risk of Symptomatic Venous Thromboembolism After Surgery for Spine Metastatic Bone Lesions: A Retrospective Study.脊柱转移瘤术后症状性静脉血栓栓塞症的高风险:一项回顾性研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 Jul;477(7):1674-1686. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000733.
4
Association of Prolonged-Duration Chemoprophylaxis With Venous Thromboembolism in High-risk Patients With Head and Neck Cancer.高危头颈部癌症患者中延长时间化学预防与静脉血栓栓塞的关联。
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2021 Apr 1;147(4):320-328. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2020.5151.
5
Bevacizumab Use and the Risk of Arterial and Venous Thromboembolism in Patients with High-Grade Gliomas: A Nested Case-Control Study.贝伐珠单抗在高级别脑胶质瘤患者中的应用与动静脉血栓栓塞风险:一项巢式病例对照研究。
Pharmacotherapy. 2019 Sep;39(9):921-928. doi: 10.1002/phar.2310. Epub 2019 Aug 6.
6
Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Direct-acting Oral Anticoagulants and Warfarin in Patients with Venous Thromboembolism and Active Cancer: An Observational Analysis.直接口服抗凝剂与华法林治疗伴有活动性癌症的静脉血栓栓塞症患者的有效性和安全性比较:一项观察性分析。
Clin Ther. 2020 Sep;42(9):e161-e176. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2020.06.022. Epub 2020 Aug 4.
7
Venous thromboembolism after trauma: when do children become adults?创伤后静脉血栓栓塞:儿童何时成为成年人?
JAMA Surg. 2013 Dec;148(12):1123-30. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2013.3558.
8
Warfarin Discontinuation in Patients With Unprovoked Venous Thromboembolism: A Large US Insurance Database Analysis.非诱因性静脉血栓栓塞症患者停用华法林:一项美国大型保险数据库分析
Am J Ther. 2016 Nov/Dec;23(6):e1744-e1753. doi: 10.1097/MJT.0000000000000167.
9
Trends in Venous Thromboembolism Anticoagulation in Patients Hospitalized With COVID-19.COVID-19 住院患者静脉血栓栓塞症抗凝治疗趋势。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jun 1;4(6):e2111788. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.11788.
10
Healthcare resource utilization and costs associated with venous thromboembolism in cancer patients treated with anticoagulants.癌症患者抗凝治疗相关静脉血栓栓塞症的医疗资源利用和成本。
J Med Econ. 2019 Nov;22(11):1134-1140. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2019.1620752. Epub 2019 Jun 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Neurocritical Complications of Basal Cell Carcinoma With Intracranial Invasion.基底细胞癌颅内侵犯的神经重症并发症
Cureus. 2024 Oct 8;16(10):e71080. doi: 10.7759/cureus.71080. eCollection 2024 Oct.
2
Postoperative Venous Thromboembolism after Neurotologic Surgery.神经耳科手术后的术后静脉血栓栓塞症
J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2021 Jun;82(3):378-382. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-3400223. Epub 2019 Nov 14.
3
Postoperative Complications of Paramedian Forehead Flap Reconstruction.额部正中皮瓣重建术后并发症。
JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2019 Jul 1;21(4):298-304. doi: 10.1001/jamafacial.2018.1855.

本文引用的文献

1
Mechanisms and risk factors of thrombosis in cancer.癌症中血栓形成的机制和风险因素。
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2017 Oct;118:79-83. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2017.08.003. Epub 2017 Aug 25.
2
Systematic review and meta-analysis of venous thromboembolism in otolaryngology-head and neck surgery.耳鼻喉头颈外科静脉血栓栓塞的系统评价与荟萃分析
Head Neck. 2017 Jun;39(6):1249-1258. doi: 10.1002/hed.24758. Epub 2017 Mar 29.
3
Cancer Statistics, 2017.《2017 年癌症统计》
CA Cancer J Clin. 2017 Jan;67(1):7-30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21387. Epub 2017 Jan 5.
4
Primary prophylaxis of VTE in cancer outpatients.癌症门诊患者静脉血栓栓塞症的一级预防
Thromb Res. 2016 Apr;140 Suppl 1:S103-8. doi: 10.1016/S0049-3848(16)30108-6.
5
Validation of the Caprini Venous Thromboembolism Risk Assessment Model in Critically Ill Surgical Patients.危重症手术患者卡普里尼静脉血栓栓塞风险评估模型的验证。
JAMA Surg. 2015 Oct;150(10):941-8. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2015.1841.
6
Evaluation of VTE Prophylaxis in an Educational Hospital: Comparison Between the Institutional Guideline (Caprini 2006) and the ACCP Guideline (Ninth Edition).一家教学医院的静脉血栓栓塞症预防评估:机构指南(2006年卡普里尼)与美国胸科医师学会指南(第九版)的比较
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2016 Oct;22(7):627-32. doi: 10.1177/1076029615575344. Epub 2015 Mar 9.
7
The timing of preoperative prophylactic low-molecular-weight heparin administration in breast reconstruction.术前预防性低分子肝素给药在乳房重建中的时机。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Aug;132(2):279-284. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318295870e.
8
Thromboembolism and anticoagulation in pancreatic cancer.胰腺癌中的血栓栓塞与抗凝治疗
JOP. 2013 Mar 10;14(2):135-7. doi: 10.6092/1590-8577/1480.
9
Prevention of VTE in nonorthopedic surgical patients: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines.非骨科手术患者静脉血栓栓塞症的预防:抗血栓治疗和血栓预防,第 9 版:美国胸科医师学会基于证据的临床实践指南。
Chest. 2012 Feb;141(2 Suppl):e227S-e277S. doi: 10.1378/chest.11-2297.
10
A modification of the Elixhauser comorbidity measures into a point system for hospital death using administrative data.将埃利克斯豪泽共病测量法修改为一种使用行政数据的医院死亡点数系统。
Med Care. 2009 Jun;47(6):626-33. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31819432e5.

角化细胞癌患者的静脉血栓栓塞风险。

Risk of Venous Thromboembolism in Patients With Keratinocyte Carcinoma.

机构信息

Division of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.

Medical student, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.

出版信息

JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2018 Dec 1;20(6):453-459. doi: 10.1001/jamafacial.2018.0331.

DOI:10.1001/jamafacial.2018.0331
PMID:29800029
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6248214/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Although malignancy is an established risk factor for venous thromboembolism (VTE), the risk of VTE specifically in patients with keratinocyte carcinoma (KC) has not been previously studied.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the risk of VTE in patients with KC compared with patients not diagnosed with cancer and with patients diagnosed with common malignant neoplasms associated with VTE.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Population-based retrospective analysis of patient insurance claims made between January 1, 2007, and December 31, 2014, from the Truven MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Supplemental Databases. Patients treated across the United States were divided into 3 cohorts: patients with KC, patients with pancreatic cancer or acute myelogenous leukemia who are thus at high risk for VTE, and patients without a history of common malignant neoplasms. Patients were excluded from the KC cohort if they had a history of another type of cancer. Data were analyzed between April 1, 2017, and January 15, 2018.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Diagnosis of VTE within 1 year following the index date (for the KC and high-risk cohorts, the date of the initial diagnosis of cancer; for the control cohort, the date following 365 days of continuous insurance enrollment). Logistic regression was used to assess the risk of VTE in the KC cohort compared with the high-risk and control cohorts before and after matching across patient characteristics and known risk factors for VTE.

RESULTS

Of 5 753 613 potentially eligible patients, the final sample consisted of 740 246 patients (12.8%) across 3 cohorts. Of the 740 246 study participants, 417 839 were in the KC cohort (223 986 [53.6%] men, mean [SD] age, 64.2 [13.6] years); 314 736 were in the control cohort (135 203 [43.0%] men, 42.9 [15.2] years); and 7671 were in the high-risk cohort (3502 [45.7%] men, 59.4 [14.4] years) The risk of VTE in the KC cohort was lower compared with the high-risk cohort in univariable analysis (odds ratio [OR], 0.22; 95% CI, 0.20-0.23; P < .001), multivariable analysis (OR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.26-0.32; P < .001), and after matching across patient characteristics and known risk factors (OR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.35-0.78; P = .001). The risk of VTE in the KC cohort was higher in the univariable analysis (OR, 2.31; 95% CI, 2.23-2.41; P < .001), lower in the multivariable analysis (OR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.80-0.90; P < .001), and not different after matching of patient characteristics and risk factors (OR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.89-1.01; P = .08) than that of the control cohort.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The results of this study provided no evidence supporting the increased risk of VTE in the KC cohort compared with the control cohort. Given the inherent risks of chemoprophylaxis, the need for prophylactic anticoagulation in patients with KC who are scheduled for surgery should be carefully considered.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

NA.

摘要

重要性

虽然恶性肿瘤是静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)的既定危险因素,但角化细胞癌(KC)患者的 VTE 风险尚未得到研究。

目的

确定与未诊断为癌症的患者和与 VTE 相关的常见恶性肿瘤诊断的患者相比,KC 患者的 VTE 风险。

设计、设置和参与者:2007 年 1 月 1 日至 2014 年 12 月 31 日期间,从 Truven MarketScan 商业和 Medicare 补充数据库中进行的基于人群的回顾性患者保险索赔分析。接受全美治疗的患者被分为 3 个队列:KC 患者、胰腺癌或急性髓样白血病患者(这些患者的 VTE 风险较高)和没有常见恶性肿瘤病史的患者。如果 KC 队列的患者有其他类型的癌症病史,则将其排除在外。数据分析于 2017 年 4 月 1 日至 2018 年 1 月 15 日进行。

主要结果和措施

在索引日期后 1 年内(对于 KC 和高危队列,为癌症的初始诊断日期;对于对照组,为连续保险登记后 365 天)诊断为 VTE。使用逻辑回归评估 KC 队列与高危和对照组在患者特征和 VTE 已知危险因素匹配前后的 VTE 风险。

结果

在 5753613 名潜在合格患者中,最终样本由 3 个队列的 740246 名患者(417839 名男性[53.6%],平均[SD]年龄 64.2[13.6]岁;314736 名女性[43.0%],42.9[15.2]岁)组成。在 740246 名研究参与者中,7671 人在高危队列中(3502 名男性[45.7%],59.4[14.4]岁);314736 人在对照组中(135203 名男性[43.0%],42.9[15.2]岁);740246 人在 KC 队列中(417839 名男性[53.6%],64.2[13.6]岁)。在单变量分析中,KC 队列的 VTE 风险低于高危队列(比值比[OR],0.22;95%CI,0.20-0.23;P<0.001),多变量分析(OR,0.29;95%CI,0.26-0.32;P<0.001),以及在患者特征和已知危险因素匹配后(OR,0.52;95%CI,0.35-0.78;P=0.001)。在单变量分析中,KC 队列的 VTE 风险更高(OR,2.31;95%CI,2.23-2.41;P<0.001),在多变量分析中更低(OR,0.85;95%CI,0.80-0.90;P<0.001),并且在患者特征和危险因素匹配后没有差异(OR,0.95;95%CI,0.89-1.01;P=0.08)比对照组。

结论和相关性

本研究结果没有证据支持 KC 队列的 VTE 风险高于对照组。鉴于化学预防的固有风险,应仔细考虑计划手术的 KC 患者预防性抗凝的需要。

证据水平

无。