• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

青霉素与其他β-内酰胺类药物治疗青霉素敏感金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症的临床结局

Clinical Outcomes with Penicillin Versus Alternative β-Lactams in the Treatment of Penicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia.

作者信息

Shah Megan D, Wardlow Lynn C, Stevenson Kurt B, Coe Kelci E, Reed Erica E

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio.

Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio.

出版信息

Pharmacotherapy. 2018 Jul;38(7):769-775. doi: 10.1002/phar.2124. Epub 2018 Jun 25.

DOI:10.1002/phar.2124
PMID:29800490
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To identify the impact of penicillin versus alternative β-lactams on clinical outcomes in patients with penicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (PSSA) bacteremia.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Academic medical center.

PATIENTS

Adult patients with PSSA bacteremia treated with a β-lactam as definitive therapy.

MEASUREMENTS

The primary outcome was a composite end point of 30-day clinical failure (change in PSSA therapy due to persistent or worsening signs and symptoms, PSSA bacteremia recurrence or persistence, and/or infection-related mortality) in patients treated with penicillin versus alternative β-lactams. Secondary outcomes included infection-related and hospital length of stay (LOS), 90-day recurrence, 90-day infection-related readmission, 30-day all-cause mortality, adverse drug events (ADEs), and 30-day change in PSSA therapy due to ADEs. A subgroup analysis comparing penicillin, nafcillin, and cefazolin was also conducted.

MAIN RESULTS

For the 122 patients who were included, the most common definitive therapies were nafcillin (37%), cefazolin (29%), and penicillin (21%). No difference was found in 30-day clinical failure (4% vs 11%, p=0.46), infection-related LOS (12 days vs 11 days, p=0.39), hospital LOS (12.5 days vs 12 days, p=0.69), 90-day recurrence (p=1.00), 90-day infection-related readmission (p=1.00), or 30-day all-cause mortality (p=0.45) between penicillin and other β-lactams. The prevalence of ADEs was different among penicillin, nafcillin, and cefazolin (p=0.049), with nafcillin requiring more changes in therapy (p=0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

Definitive therapy with penicillin had similar efficacy compared with alternative β-lactams for the treatment of PSSA bacteremia. However, nafcillin was associated with more ADEs requiring a change in therapy.

摘要

目的

确定青霉素与其他β-内酰胺类药物对青霉素敏感金黄色葡萄球菌(PSSA)菌血症患者临床结局的影响。

设计

回顾性队列研究。

地点

学术医疗中心。

患者

接受β-内酰胺类药物作为确定性治疗的成年PSSA菌血症患者。

测量指标

主要结局是接受青霉素与其他β-内酰胺类药物治疗的患者30天临床失败的复合终点(因持续或恶化的体征和症状、PSSA菌血症复发或持续以及/或感染相关死亡率而改变PSSA治疗方案)。次要结局包括感染相关住院时间(LOS)和总住院时间、90天复发率、90天感染相关再入院率、30天全因死亡率、不良药物事件(ADEs)以及因ADEs导致的30天内PSSA治疗方案的改变。还进行了一项比较青霉素、萘夫西林和头孢唑林的亚组分析。

主要结果

纳入的122例患者中,最常用的确定性治疗药物为萘夫西林(37%)、头孢唑林(29%)和青霉素(21%)。青霉素与其他β-内酰胺类药物在30天临床失败率(4%对11%,p = 0.46)、感染相关LOS(12天对11天,p = 0.39)、总住院时间(12.5天对12天,p = 0.69)、90天复发率(p = 1.00)、90天感染相关再入院率(p = 1.00)或30天全因死亡率(p = 0.45)方面未发现差异。青霉素、萘夫西林和头孢唑林的ADEs发生率不同(p = 0.049),萘夫西林需要更多的治疗方案改变(p = 0.005)。

结论

对于PSSA菌血症的治疗,青霉素作为确定性治疗与其他β-内酰胺类药物具有相似的疗效。然而萘夫西林与更多需要改变治疗方案的ADEs相关。

相似文献

1
Clinical Outcomes with Penicillin Versus Alternative β-Lactams in the Treatment of Penicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia.青霉素与其他β-内酰胺类药物治疗青霉素敏感金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症的临床结局
Pharmacotherapy. 2018 Jul;38(7):769-775. doi: 10.1002/phar.2124. Epub 2018 Jun 25.
2
Comparison of penicillins (penicillin G and ampicillin) and cefazolin as a definitive therapy against penicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (PSSA) bacteremia in Japan: a retrospective cohort study.比较青霉素(青霉素 G 和氨苄西林)和头孢唑林作为日本青霉素敏感金黄色葡萄球菌(PSSA)菌血症的确定性治疗:一项回顾性队列研究。
J Infect Chemother. 2020 Apr;26(4):358-362. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2019.10.023. Epub 2019 Dec 9.
3
Penicillin versus anti-staphylococcal beta-lactams for penicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus blood stream infections: a retrospective cohort study.青霉素与抗葡萄球菌β-内酰胺类药物治疗青霉素敏感金黄色葡萄球菌血流感染:一项回顾性队列研究。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2022 Jan;41(1):147-151. doi: 10.1007/s10096-021-04330-2. Epub 2021 Aug 25.
4
Does the Beta-Lactam Matter? Nafcillin versus Cefazolin for Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Bloodstream Infections.β-内酰胺类药物是否重要?耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌血流感染时,萘夫西林与头孢唑林的比较。
Chemotherapy. 2018;63(6):345-351. doi: 10.1159/000499033. Epub 2019 Apr 9.
5
Comparative Effectiveness of Cefazolin Versus Nafcillin or Oxacillin for Treatment of Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Infections Complicated by Bacteremia: A Nationwide Cohort Study.头孢唑林与萘夫西林或苯唑西林治疗合并菌血症的耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌感染的疗效比较:一项全国性队列研究。
Clin Infect Dis. 2017 Jul 1;65(1):100-106. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix287.
6
Treatment outcomes with benzylpenicillin and non-benzylpenicillin antibiotics, and the performance of the penicillin zone-edge test versus molecular detection of blaZ in penicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (PSSA) bacteraemia.苯唑西林和非苯唑西林抗生素治疗结果,以及青霉素敏感金黄色葡萄球菌(PSSA)菌血症中青霉素带边缘试验与 blaZ 分子检测的性能比较。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2023 Oct 3;78(10):2515-2523. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkad263.
7
Comparison of the efficacy of nafcillin and glycopeptides as definitive therapy for patients with methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: a retrospective cohort study.萘夫西林与糖肽类药物作为甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症患者确定性治疗的疗效比较:一项回顾性队列研究
BMC Infect Dis. 2018 Jan 30;18(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s12879-018-2978-z.
8
Comparison of Nafcillin and Cefazolin for the Treatment of Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia.甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症的萘夫西林与头孢唑林治疗比较。
Am J Med Sci. 2020 Jul;360(1):35-41. doi: 10.1016/j.amjms.2020.04.006. Epub 2020 Apr 17.
9
The empirical combination of vancomycin and a β-lactam for Staphylococcal bacteremia.万古霉素与β-内酰胺类药物联合治疗葡萄球菌菌血症的经验。
Clin Infect Dis. 2013 Dec;57(12):1760-5. doi: 10.1093/cid/cit560. Epub 2013 Aug 28.
10
Comparative Effectiveness of Exclusive Exposure to Nafcillin or Oxacillin, Cefazolin, Piperacillin/Tazobactam, and Fluoroquinolones Among a National Cohort of Veterans With Methicillin-Susceptible Bloodstream Infection.在全国退伍军人甲氧西林敏感血流感染队列中,单独使用萘夫西林或苯唑西林、头孢唑林、哌拉西林/他唑巴坦和氟喹诺酮类药物的比较效果。
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2019 Jun 6;6(7):ofz270. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofz270. eCollection 2019 Jul.

引用本文的文献

1
[Common skin and soft tissue infections-current recommendations].[常见皮肤及软组织感染——当前建议]
Dermatologie (Heidelb). 2025 Aug;76(8):470-479. doi: 10.1007/s00105-025-05537-6. Epub 2025 Jul 28.
2
Antibiotic therapy and clinical outcomes of penicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (PSSA) bloodstream infection (BSI): a ten-year retrospective cohort study.青霉素敏感金黄色葡萄球菌(PSSA)血流感染(BSI)的抗生素治疗与临床结局:一项十年回顾性队列研究
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 9;15(1):12103. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-96383-y.
3
Cefazolin Versus Anti-Staphylococcal Penicillins for the Treatment of Patients with Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Infection: A Meta-Analysis with Trial Sequential Analysis.
头孢唑林与抗葡萄球菌青霉素治疗甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌感染患者的疗效比较:一项采用序贯试验分析的荟萃分析
Infect Dis Ther. 2019 Dec;8(4):671-686. doi: 10.1007/s40121-019-00259-4. Epub 2019 Aug 8.
4
Comparative Effectiveness of Exclusive Exposure to Nafcillin or Oxacillin, Cefazolin, Piperacillin/Tazobactam, and Fluoroquinolones Among a National Cohort of Veterans With Methicillin-Susceptible Bloodstream Infection.在全国退伍军人甲氧西林敏感血流感染队列中,单独使用萘夫西林或苯唑西林、头孢唑林、哌拉西林/他唑巴坦和氟喹诺酮类药物的比较效果。
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2019 Jun 6;6(7):ofz270. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofz270. eCollection 2019 Jul.
5
Defining the Breakpoint Duration of Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia Predictive of Poor Outcomes.定义金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症不良预后的断点持续时间。
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Feb 3;70(4):566-573. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz257.
6
Twenty-Year Trends in Antimicrobial Susceptibilities Among From the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program.哨兵抗菌监测计划中20年的抗菌药物敏感性趋势。 需注意,你提供的原文“Twenty-Year Trends in Antimicrobial Susceptibilities Among From the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program.”表述似乎不太完整,“Among”后面缺少具体内容。以上译文是基于现有内容尽量准确翻译的。
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2019 Mar 15;6(Suppl 1):S47-S53. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofy270. eCollection 2019 Mar.
7
Evolution of haemostatic parameters and risk of bleeding during treatment with cefazolin.头孢唑林治疗期间止血参数的演变和出血风险。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2019 Jan;38(1):177-183. doi: 10.1007/s10096-018-3412-6. Epub 2018 Nov 10.