• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

头孢唑林治疗期间止血参数的演变和出血风险。

Evolution of haemostatic parameters and risk of bleeding during treatment with cefazolin.

机构信息

Infectious Diseases Unit, Centre Hospitalier Sud Ile de France, Melun, France.

Medical Biology Laboratory, Centre Hospitalier Sud Ile de France, Melun, France.

出版信息

Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2019 Jan;38(1):177-183. doi: 10.1007/s10096-018-3412-6. Epub 2018 Nov 10.

DOI:10.1007/s10096-018-3412-6
PMID:30414092
Abstract

In 2017, five cases of severe haemorrhages during treatment with cefazolin occurred in France. The aim of this study was to assess the risk of haemorrhage related to treatment with cefazolin by evaluating haemostatic parameters and bleeding events. A retrospective study was conducted from January 2016 to December 2017. Two populations were analysed: (i) overall population, which included all patients treated with cefazolin during this period and (ii) coagulation study population, which included all patients treated with cefazolin with available coagulation parameters (activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) and international normalised ratio (INR) at baseline and at the end of treatment or EoT). Values of either aPTT or INR at baseline and at EoT were compared. Cases of severe haemorrhages were reported and correlated with values of aPTT and INR. Overall, 132 patients received cefazolin and 59/132 (45%) were included in the coagulation study group. A significant increase of median aPTT was observed from baseline to EoT (39.5 and 44.3 sec; p = 0.004, respectively). Overall, severe haemorrhage occurred in 7/132 (5%) patients. Coagulation parameters were available in three of them, and no correlation was observed between bleeding events and aPTT increase. This study showed that bleeding is probably more frequent than ever reported before during cefazolin treatment. The significant increase of aPTT observed during cefazolin treatment was not correlated with risk of haemorrhage. Further studies are needed to explore the possible physio-pathological pathways behind the modification of haemostatic parameters and risk of haemorrhage.

摘要

2017 年,法国发生了五例头孢唑林治疗期间严重出血的病例。本研究旨在通过评估止血参数和出血事件来评估头孢唑林治疗相关出血的风险。这是一项回顾性研究,时间为 2016 年 1 月至 2017 年 12 月。分析了两个人群:(i)总体人群,包括在此期间接受头孢唑林治疗的所有患者;(ii)凝血研究人群,包括所有接受头孢唑林治疗且具有可用凝血参数(基线和治疗结束时的活化部分凝血活酶时间(aPTT)和国际标准化比值(INR)的患者)。比较了基线和治疗结束时 aPTT 或 INR 的值。报告了严重出血的病例,并与 aPTT 和 INR 值相关联。共有 132 名患者接受了头孢唑林治疗,其中 59/132(45%)纳入了凝血研究组。从基线到治疗结束时,中位数 aPTT 显著增加(分别为 39.5 和 44.3 秒;p=0.004)。共有 7/132(5%)患者发生严重出血。其中三人的凝血参数可用,但未观察到出血事件与 aPTT 增加之间的相关性。本研究表明,在头孢唑林治疗期间,出血的频率可能比以往报道的更为频繁。在头孢唑林治疗期间观察到的 aPTT 显著增加与出血风险无关。需要进一步的研究来探讨止血参数改变和出血风险背后可能的生理病理途径。

相似文献

1
Evolution of haemostatic parameters and risk of bleeding during treatment with cefazolin.头孢唑林治疗期间止血参数的演变和出血风险。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2019 Jan;38(1):177-183. doi: 10.1007/s10096-018-3412-6. Epub 2018 Nov 10.
2
Limits of agreement between measures obtained from standard laboratory and the point-of-care device Hemochron Signature Elite(R) during acute haemorrhage.急性出血期间,标准实验室检测结果与即时检测设备Hemochron Signature Elite(R)所获测量值之间的一致性界限。
Br J Anaesth. 2014 Mar;112(3):514-20. doi: 10.1093/bja/aet384. Epub 2013 Dec 12.
3
Assessment of activated partial thromboplastin time and factor IX in subjects attending an anticoagulation clinic.对抗凝门诊患者活化部分凝血活酶时间和因子IX的评估。
Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2000 Sep;11(6):537-42. doi: 10.1097/00001721-200009000-00005.
4
Comparability of the results of PT-INR with local MNPT and APTTR with MNAPTT on different coagulation analyzers in China.中国不同凝血分析仪上PT-INR结果与本地MNPT以及APTTR与MNAPTT结果的可比性。
Int J Lab Hematol. 2009 Jun;31(3):352-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-553X.2008.01071.x. Epub 2008 May 28.
5
Comparison of Antifactor Xa and Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time Monitoring for Heparin Dosing in Vascular Surgery Patients: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.血管外科患者肝素剂量的抗Xa因子与活化部分凝血活酶时间监测比较:一项单中心回顾性研究
Ther Drug Monit. 2018 Feb;40(1):151-155. doi: 10.1097/FTD.0000000000000463.
6
The influence of laboratory coagulation tests and clotting factor levels on Rotation Thromboelastometry (ROTEM(R)) during major surgery with hemorrhage.在大出血的大手术期间,实验室凝血试验和凝血因子水平对旋转血栓弹性描记术(ROTEM(R))的影响。
Anesth Analg. 2013 Aug;117(2):314-21. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31829569ac. Epub 2013 Jun 18.
7
Discordant aPTT and anti-Xa values and outcomes in hospitalized patients treated with intravenous unfractionated heparin.住院患者静脉使用普通肝素时,活化部分凝血活酶时间(aPTT)和抗 Xa 活性检测值不相符与临床结局的关系。
Ann Pharmacother. 2013 Feb;47(2):151-8. doi: 10.1345/aph.1R635. Epub 2013 Feb 5.
8
Effect of isotretinoin on prothrombin time (PT), international normalized ratio (INR), and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT).异维 A 酸对凝血酶原时间(PT)、国际标准化比值(INR)和活化部分凝血活酶时间(aPTT)的影响。
J Dermatolog Treat. 2013 Aug;24(4):272-4. doi: 10.3109/09546634.2011.652063. Epub 2012 Jan 11.
9
Bleeding events and activated partial thromboplastin time with dabigatran in clinical practice.临床实践中达比加群的出血事件和活化部分凝血活酶时间。
J Cardiol. 2013 Aug;62(2):121-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2013.03.010. Epub 2013 May 14.
10
Standardization of coagulation tests.凝血试验的标准化。
Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 1999;30 Suppl 3:79-85.

引用本文的文献

1
Coagulation disorders during treatment with cefazolin and rifampicin: rare but dangerous.头孢唑林和利福平治疗期间的凝血障碍:罕见但危险。
J Bone Jt Infect. 2021 Apr 1;6(5):131-134. doi: 10.5194/jbji-6-131-2021. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Efficacy and safety of cefazolin versus antistaphylococcal penicillins for the treatment of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.头孢唑林与抗葡萄球菌青霉素治疗甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Infect Dis. 2018 Oct 11;18(1):508. doi: 10.1186/s12879-018-3418-9.
2
Efficacy of cloxacillin versus cefazolin for methicillin-susceptible bacteraemia (CloCeBa): study protocol for a randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial.氯唑西林与头孢唑林治疗甲氧西林敏感菌血症的疗效比较(CloCeBa):一项随机对照非劣效性试验的研究方案
BMJ Open. 2018 Sep 1;8(8):e023151. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023151.
3
Clinical Outcomes with Penicillin Versus Alternative β-Lactams in the Treatment of Penicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia.
青霉素与其他β-内酰胺类药物治疗青霉素敏感金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症的临床结局
Pharmacotherapy. 2018 Jul;38(7):769-775. doi: 10.1002/phar.2124. Epub 2018 Jun 25.
4
Nafcillin versus cefazolin for the treatment of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia.萘夫西林与头孢唑林治疗耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症。
J Infect Public Health. 2018 Sep-Oct;11(5):727-731. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2018.02.004. Epub 2018 Mar 8.
5
A large retrospective cohort study of cefazolin compared with flucloxacillin for methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia.头孢唑林与氟氯西林治疗甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症的大型回顾性队列研究。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2018 Aug;52(2):297-300. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2018.02.013. Epub 2018 Feb 28.
6
Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Safety of Antistaphylococcal Penicillins Compared to Cefazolin.抗葡萄球菌青霉素与头孢唑林安全性的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2018 Mar 27;62(4). doi: 10.1128/AAC.01816-17. Print 2018 Apr.
7
[Cefazolin and coagulation disorders: a case report].[头孢唑林与凝血障碍:一例报告]
Ann Biol Clin (Paris). 2018 Jan 1;76(1):104-106. doi: 10.1684/abc.2017.1314.
8
Hypoprothrombinemia and severe perioperative haemorrhagic complications in cardiac surgery patients treated with high-dose cefazolin for infective endocarditis.心脏手术患者因感染性心内膜炎接受高剂量头孢唑林治疗后出现低凝血酶原血症和严重围手术期出血并发症。
Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2018 Apr;37(2):167-170. doi: 10.1016/j.accpm.2017.07.006. Epub 2017 Sep 1.
9
Cefazolin versus anti-staphylococcal penicillins for treatment of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia: a narrative review.头孢唑林与抗葡萄球菌青霉素治疗耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症的比较:叙述性综述。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2018 Feb;24(2):125-132. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2017.07.003. Epub 2017 Jul 8.
10
Comparative Effectiveness of Cefazolin Versus Nafcillin or Oxacillin for Treatment of Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Infections Complicated by Bacteremia: A Nationwide Cohort Study.头孢唑林与萘夫西林或苯唑西林治疗合并菌血症的耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌感染的疗效比较:一项全国性队列研究。
Clin Infect Dis. 2017 Jul 1;65(1):100-106. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix287.