Department of Internal Medicine, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa.
Center for Comprehensive Access and Delivery Research and Evaluation, Iowa City Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Iowa City, Iowa.
Clin Infect Dis. 2017 Jul 1;65(1):100-106. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix287.
To treat patients with methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) infections, β-lactams are recommended for definitive therapy; however, the comparative effectiveness of individual β-lactams is unknown. This study compared definitive therapy with cefazolin vs nafcillin or oxacillin among patients with MSSA infections complicated by bacteremia.
This retrospective study included patients admitted to 119 Veterans Affairs hospitals from 2003 to 2010. Patients were included if they had a blood culture positive for MSSA and received definitive therapy with cefazolin, nafcillin, or oxacillin. Cox proportional hazards regression and ordinal logistic regression were used to identify associations between antibiotic therapy and mortality or recurrence. A recurrent infection was defined as a MSSA blood culture between 45 and 365 days after the first MSSA blood culture.
Of 3167 patients, 1163 (37%) patients received definitive therapy with cefazolin. Patients who received cefazolin had a 37% reduction in 30-day mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 0.63; 95% confidence interval [CI], .51-.78) and a 23% reduction in 90-day mortality (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, .66-.90) compared with patients receiving nafcillin or oxacillin, after controlling for other factors. The odds of recurrence (odds ratio, 1.13; 95% CI, .94-1.36) were similar among patients who received cefazolin compared with patients who received nafcillin or oxacillin, after controlling for other factors.
In this large, multicenter study, patients who received cefazolin had a lower risk of mortality and similar odds of recurrent infections compared with nafcillin or oxacillin for MSSA infections complicated by bacteremia. Physicians might consider definitive therapy with cefazolin for these infections.
为治疗耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MSSA)感染患者,推荐使用β-内酰胺类药物进行确定性治疗;然而,个体β-内酰胺类药物的疗效比较尚不清楚。本研究比较了 MSSA 菌血症合并感染患者中头孢唑林与萘夫西林或苯唑西林的确定性治疗效果。
本回顾性研究纳入了 2003 年至 2010 年期间入住 119 家退伍军人事务部医院的患者。入选标准为血培养阳性且接受头孢唑林、萘夫西林或苯唑西林确定性治疗的 MSSA 感染患者。采用 Cox 比例风险回归和有序逻辑回归分析确定抗生素治疗与死亡率或复发之间的关联。复发感染定义为首次 MSSA 血培养后 45-365 天之间的 MSSA 血培养阳性。
在 3167 例患者中,有 1163 例(37%)接受头孢唑林确定性治疗。与接受萘夫西林或苯唑西林治疗的患者相比,接受头孢唑林治疗的患者 30 天死亡率降低 37%(风险比[HR],0.63;95%置信区间[CI],0.51-0.78),90 天死亡率降低 23%(HR,0.77;95% CI,0.66-0.90),校正其他因素后。校正其他因素后,与接受萘夫西林或苯唑西林治疗的患者相比,接受头孢唑林治疗的患者复发的可能性(比值比,1.13;95% CI,0.94-1.36)相似。
在这项大型多中心研究中,与接受萘夫西林或苯唑西林治疗的患者相比,MSSA 菌血症合并感染患者接受头孢唑林治疗的死亡率较低,且复发感染的风险相似。对于这些感染,医生可以考虑使用头孢唑林进行确定性治疗。