Motivational interviewing-based training vs traditional training on the uptake of cervical screening: a quasi-experimental study.

OBJECTIVES

Cervical cancer, a major health issue affecting women, is preventable and can be successfully treated. It is essential that measures are taken to improve the uptake of screening for this cancer. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of motivational interviewing (MI)-based training and traditional training on the frequency of cervical cancer screening tests in a group of working female teachers.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a quasi-experimental study.

METHODS

This research was conducted in 2017 among 134 teachers (aged 30-60 years) working in southeastern Iran. The participants were selected from among the eligible individuals and subsequently divided into MI-based training and traditional training groups (n = 67 for each group). Each group received a three-session training program, and 20 weeks after the end of the last training session, the information obtained from cervical cancer screening tests was documented. To analyze the data, independent t-test and Chi-squared test were run in SPSS, version 21.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of demographic characteristics such as age, age at the first pregnancy, age of marriage, the number of parities, and educational level. Twenty weeks after intervention, 20.9% of the MI-based training group underwent Pap smear screening test, while 9% of the women in the traditional training group took the test, indicating a statistically significant difference between the two groups (P < 0.0.5).

CONCLUSION

MI-based training has a significant positive effect on women's compliance with cervical cancer screening tests. Therefore, it is recommended that this technique be adopted in women's health centers.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

IRCT2017100729954N4.