• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Impact of an antimicrobial stewardship program on outcomes in patients with community-acquired pneumonia admitted to a tertiary community hospital.抗菌药物管理计划对一家三级社区医院收治的社区获得性肺炎患者治疗结局的影响。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2018 Jun 1;75(11 Supplement 2):S42-S50. doi: 10.2146/ajhp170360.
2
Can an antimicrobial stewardship program reduce length of stay of immune-competent adult patients admitted to hospital with diagnosis of community-acquired pneumonia? Study protocol for pragmatic controlled non-randomized clinical study.抗菌药物管理计划能否缩短确诊为社区获得性肺炎的免疫功能正常成年住院患者的住院时间?实用对照非随机临床研究的研究方案。
Trials. 2015 Aug 14;16:355. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0871-2.
3
Medical resource utilization among community-acquired pneumonia patients initially treated with levofloxacin 750 mg daily versus ceftriaxone 1000 mg plus azithromycin 500 mg daily: a US-based study.初始接受每日750毫克左氧氟沙星治疗与每日1000毫克头孢曲松加500毫克阿奇霉素治疗的社区获得性肺炎患者的医疗资源利用情况:一项美国的研究。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2009 Apr;25(4):859-68. doi: 10.1185/03007990902779749.
4
Antibiotic treatment patterns, costs, and resource utilization among patients with community acquired pneumonia: a US cohort study.社区获得性肺炎患者的抗生素治疗模式、成本及资源利用情况:一项美国队列研究
Hosp Pract (1995). 2017 Feb;45(1):1-8. doi: 10.1080/21548331.2017.1279012. Epub 2017 Jan 18.
5
Effectiveness of antimicrobial guidelines for community-acquired pneumonia in children.抗菌指南对儿童社区获得性肺炎的疗效。
Pediatrics. 2012 May;129(5):e1326-33. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-2412. Epub 2012 Apr 9.
6
Impact of Antimicrobial Stewardship on Outcomes in Hospitalized Veterans With Pneumonia.抗菌药物管理对住院退伍军人肺炎预后的影响。
Clin Ther. 2016 Jul;38(7):1750-8. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2016.06.004. Epub 2016 Jun 24.
7
Is gentamicin safe and effective for severe community-acquired pneumonia? An 8-year retrospective cohort study.庆大霉素治疗重症社区获得性肺炎安全有效吗?一项 8 年回顾性队列研究。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2018 Jun;51(6):862-866. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2018.01.018. Epub 2018 May 18.
8
Levofloxacin Versus Ceftriaxone and Azithromycin Combination in the Treatment of Community Acquired Pneumonia in Hospitalized Patients.左氧氟沙星与头孢曲松和阿奇霉素联合用药治疗住院患者社区获得性肺炎的疗效比较
Recent Pat Antiinfect Drug Discov. 2018;13(3):228-239. doi: 10.2174/1574891X13666181024154526.
9
Pediatric antibiotic stewardship: successful interventions to reduce broad-spectrum antibiotic use on general pediatric wards.儿童抗生素管理:减少普通儿科病房广谱抗生素使用的成功干预措施。
Infection. 2017 Aug;45(4):493-504. doi: 10.1007/s15010-017-1009-0. Epub 2017 Apr 10.
10
Impact of Procalcitonin Guidance with an Educational Program on Management of Adults Hospitalized with Pneumonia.降钙素原指导联合教育方案对肺炎住院成人管理的影响。
Am J Med. 2018 Feb;131(2):201.e1-201.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2017.08.039. Epub 2017 Sep 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Antibiotic Stewardship in Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia.医院获得性肺炎中的抗生素管理
Cureus. 2024 Nov 13;16(11):e73623. doi: 10.7759/cureus.73623. eCollection 2024 Nov.
2
D-PRISM: a global survey-based study to assess diagnostic and treatment approaches in pneumonia managed in intensive care.D-PRISM:一项基于全球调查的研究,旨在评估重症监护病房管理肺炎的诊断和治疗方法。
Crit Care. 2024 Nov 22;28(1):381. doi: 10.1186/s13054-024-05180-y.
3
An Implementation Roadmap for Establishing Remote Infectious Disease Specialist Support for Consultation and Antibiotic Stewardship in Resource-Limited Settings.在资源有限环境中建立远程传染病专家咨询及抗生素管理支持的实施路线图
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2022 Dec 16;9(12):ofac588. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofac588. eCollection 2022 Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Outcomes Associated With Antimicrobial De-escalation of Treatment for Pneumonia Within the Veterans Healthcare Administration.退伍军人医疗管理局内肺炎治疗抗菌药物降阶梯治疗的相关结局
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2016 Dec 10;4(1):ofw244. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofw244. eCollection 2017 Winter.
2
Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Clinical and Economic Outcomes from the Implementation of Hospital-Based Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs.基于医院的抗菌药物管理计划实施的临床和经济结果的系统评价与荟萃分析
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016 Jul 22;60(8):4840-52. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00825-16. Print 2016 Aug.
3
Implementing an Antibiotic Stewardship Program: Guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America.实施抗生素管理计划:美国传染病学会和美国医疗保健流行病学学会指南
Clin Infect Dis. 2016 May 15;62(10):e51-77. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw118. Epub 2016 Apr 13.
4
Antimicrobial stewardship programs in inpatient hospital settings: a systematic review.住院医院环境中的抗菌药物管理计划:一项系统综述。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2014 Oct;35(10):1209-28. doi: 10.1086/678057. Epub 2014 Aug 21.
5
A randomized controlled clinical trial of levofloxacin 750 mg versus 500 mg intravenous infusion in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia.一项关于750毫克左氧氟沙星与500毫克左氧氟沙星静脉输注治疗社区获得性肺炎的随机对照临床试验。
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2014 Oct;80(2):141-7. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2013.11.008. Epub 2013 Nov 15.
6
Antimicrobial use metrics and benchmarking to improve stewardship outcomes: methodology, opportunities, and challenges.抗菌药物使用指标与基准设定以改善管理成效:方法、机遇与挑战
Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2014 Jun;28(2):195-214. doi: 10.1016/j.idc.2014.01.006.
7
Vital signs: improving antibiotic use among hospitalized patients.生命体征:改善住院患者的抗生素使用情况。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2014 Mar 7;63(9):194-200.
8
Macrolides and mortality in critically ill patients with community-acquired pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.大环内酯类药物与社区获得性肺炎重症患者的死亡率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Crit Care Med. 2014 Feb;42(2):420-32. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182a66b9b.
9
Infectious diseases specialty intervention is associated with decreased mortality and lower healthcare costs.传染病专业干预与降低死亡率和降低医疗保健成本有关。
Clin Infect Dis. 2014 Jan;58(1):22-8. doi: 10.1093/cid/cit610. Epub 2013 Sep 25.
10
Antimicrobial stewardship in the management of community-acquired pneumonia.社区获得性肺炎的抗菌药物管理。
Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2013 Apr;26(2):184-8. doi: 10.1097/QCO.0b013e32835d0a8f.

抗菌药物管理计划对一家三级社区医院收治的社区获得性肺炎患者治疗结局的影响。

Impact of an antimicrobial stewardship program on outcomes in patients with community-acquired pneumonia admitted to a tertiary community hospital.

作者信息

Gordon Katie, Stevens Ryan, Westley Benjamin, Bulkow Lisa

机构信息

Alaska Native Medical Center, Anchorage, AK

Providence Alaska Medical Center, Anchorage, AK.

出版信息

Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2018 Jun 1;75(11 Supplement 2):S42-S50. doi: 10.2146/ajhp170360.

DOI:10.2146/ajhp170360
PMID:29802178
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11376219/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Results of a study evaluating the impact of an antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) on clinical outcomes in patients hospitalized for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) are reported.

METHODS

A retrospective records review was conducted at a 400-bed hospital to identify patients admitted over 3 years with CAP documented as a primary or secondary diagnosis. Clinical and medication-use outcomes during a 1-year baseline period and in the first and second years after ASP implementation (post-ASP years 1 and 2) were analyzed. A local CAP guideline was implemented around the beginning of post-ASP year 2.

RESULTS

The mean hospital length of stay declined from 7.24 days in the baseline period to 5.71 days in post-ASP year 1 ( = 0.011) and 5.52 days in post-ASP year 2 ( = 0.008). Mean inpatient antimicrobial days of therapy (DOT) declined from 5.68 days in the baseline period to 5.08 days ( = 0.045) and 4.99 days ( = 0.030) in post-ASP years 1 and 2, respectively. Mean DOT per 100 total days of antimicrobial therapy declined from 9.69 days in the baseline period to 8.85 days in post-ASP year 1 ( = 0.019) and 8.38 days in post-ASP year 2 ( = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

ASP implementation was associated with specific clinical benefits in patients with CAP, including decreased length of stay, decreased durations of antimicrobial therapy, and a shift in utilization to a primary regimen shown to produce superior clinical outcomes.

摘要

目的

报告一项评估抗菌药物管理计划(ASP)对社区获得性肺炎(CAP)住院患者临床结局影响的研究结果。

方法

在一家拥有400张床位的医院进行回顾性病历审查,以确定3年期间因CAP被记录为主要或次要诊断而入院的患者。分析了1年基线期以及ASP实施后的第一年和第二年(ASP实施后第1年和第2年)的临床和用药结局。在ASP实施后第2年年初左右实施了当地的CAP指南。

结果

平均住院天数从基线期的7.24天降至ASP实施后第1年的5.71天(P = 0.011)和ASP实施后第2年的5.52天(P = 0.008)。平均住院患者抗菌药物治疗天数(DOT)从基线期的5.68天分别降至ASP实施后第1年的5.08天(P = 0.045)和ASP实施后第2年的4.99天(P = 0.030)。每100天抗菌药物治疗的平均DOT从基线期的9.69天降至ASP实施后第1年的8.85天(P = 0.019)和ASP实施后第2年的8.38天(P = 0.001)。

结论

实施ASP对CAP患者具有特定的临床益处,包括缩短住院时间、减少抗菌药物治疗持续时间,以及使用模式向显示能产生更好临床结局的主要治疗方案转变。